Old
  (#16)
sfleinen
14.1 & One Pocket Addict
sfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond repute
 
sfleinen's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,683
vCash: 4100
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carmel, NY (1.5-hour north of Manhattan)
   
06-27-2019, 05:55 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Straightpool_99 View Post
What's so bad about that? The ignore function worked perfectly for this gentleman. I don't even see what the big deal is, anyway. Some guy says something over and over, well don't read it, then! You're banning a guy for making you scroll?

If a guy were to claim the earth was flat over and over, it's stupid, obviously, but you're not obliged to answer or even read. Personally I think the ignore function is completely unnecessary. What, you can't cope with people having dissenting opinions? When it comes to personal attacks, victimizing people with real world consequences and slander, it's a completely different matter, which should be dealt with very severely indeed.
Again, I don't defend Spidey's actions at all. BTW, it's not just a question of scrolling. The offender (ENGLISH) also took it to private messages, and would bombard those he disagreed with.

So yes, Spidey was indefensible. But ENGLISH had a l-o-n-g history of being disruptive to forum operations, not just in the Aiming Conversation forum, btw. He was awarded a series of consecutive temporary bans that got longer and longer to the point of a perma-ban. The moment he was released from the perma-ban, what happened?

ENGLISH didn't bother me, and when I saw that screen that I took a snapshot of, I thought it was funny more than anything. (You even commented to that fact in another thread that ultimately was deleted.) It didn't "bother me" at all. But it did serve as the foundation for my point.

-Sean


"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." -Isaac Asimov

"They haven't got brains, any of them, only grey fluff that's blown into their heads by mistake, and they don't think." -Eeyore, The House at Pooh Corner
  
Reply With Quote

Old
  (#17)
BC21
Poolology

BC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond repute
 
BC21's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,156
vCash: 500
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: West Virginia
   
06-27-2019, 06:01 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Straightpool_99 View Post
What's so bad about that? The ignore function worked perfectly for this gentleman. I don't even see what the big deal is, anyway. Some guy says something over and over, well don't read it, then! You're banning a guy for making you scroll?

If a guy were to claim the earth was flat over and over, it's stupid, obviously, but you're not obliged to answer or even read. Personally I think the ignore function is completely unnecessary. What, you can't cope with people having dissenting opinions? When it comes to personal attacks, victimizing people with real world consequences and slander, it's a completely different matter, which should be dealt with very severely indeed. I don't think English was an angel, he spammed the forum non stop and he did call people names at times. At least he didn't publish peoples names against their wishes for no other reason than to menace them, dig up decades old posts etc.Not to mention doing "detective work" on people to find out their names, try to find them in person, calling every pool hall on the planet etc..That's different level shit, right there.

And you say English! was the bad guy here? Some guy actually called him a child molester and of course your hero made sure everyone knew his name, so that people when they googled him would get that slanderous, completely made up accusation in his search! WTF is wrong with people? English! and I were not friends on here, we had our disagreements and I thought he went way overboard in his postings. That being said, you really can't compare what he did to what your friend did.
About a year ago or so Spidey PM'd me a screenshot of my house on Google Earth. Some people are just too obsessed with this stuff, taking it to a personal level.


POOLOLOGY
YouTube
Brian Crist
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
sfleinen
14.1 & One Pocket Addict
sfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond repute
 
sfleinen's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,683
vCash: 4100
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carmel, NY (1.5-hour north of Manhattan)
   
06-27-2019, 06:09 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC21 View Post
About a year ago or so Spidey PM'd me a screenshot of my house on Google Earth. Some people are just too obsessed with this stuff, taking it to a personal level.
I'll admit, that's bad. Concerning his Facebook page, ENGLISH outed himself to a bunch of people when he was puppy-dogging a certain well-known PBIA instructor on that person's page. It was painfully obvious who it was, and *many* people who follow that instructor picked up on it. There was no doubt who it was.

But actively R&D'ing someone's identity, location, etc. is indefensible.

-Sean


"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." -Isaac Asimov

"They haven't got brains, any of them, only grey fluff that's blown into their heads by mistake, and they don't think." -Eeyore, The House at Pooh Corner
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
BC21
Poolology

BC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond repute
 
BC21's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,156
vCash: 500
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: West Virginia
   
06-27-2019, 06:19 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfleinen View Post
I'll admit, that's bad. Concerning his Facebook page, ENGLISH outed himself to a bunch of people when he was puppy-dogging a certain well-known PBIA instructor on that person's page. It was painfully obvious who it was, and *many* people who follow that instructor picked up on it. There was no doubt who it was.

But actively R&D'ing someone's identity, location, etc. is indefensible.

-Sean
I hear ya. As far as Spidey sending me a pic of my house, I didn't complain or report him or any of that. I don't put people on ignore either -- I simply try to ignore any derogatory comments, which sometimes is hard to do and I end up replying when I shouldn't.


POOLOLOGY
YouTube
Brian Crist
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
lfigueroa
AzB Silver Member
lfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 13,250
vCash: 500
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Join Date: Oct 2005
   
06-27-2019, 06:21 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC21 View Post
About a year ago or so Spidey PM'd me a screenshot of my house on Google Earth. Some people are just too obsessed with this stuff, taking it to a personal level.

A few years back I had a well-known individual here make a post to me that mentioned a very specific detail about my house that would be unknowable to anyone unless they'd been around the property.

I found that somewhat disturbing but at the same time amazing that anyone could be so ate up about anything on AZ.

Lou Figueroa
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
Straightpool_99
I see dead balls
Straightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond reputeStraightpool_99 has a reputation beyond repute
 
Straightpool_99's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,780
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Blog Entries: 6
Join Date: Feb 2006
   
06-27-2019, 06:23 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lfigueroa View Post
A few years back I had a well-known individual here make a post to me that mentioned a very specific detail about my house that would be unknowable to anyone unless they'd been around the property.

I found that somewhat disturbing but at the same time amazing that anyone could be so ate up about anything on AZ.

Lou Figueroa
That's some bunny-boiling level of crazyness. I guess caution is adviced on this sub forum.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
lfigueroa
AzB Silver Member
lfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond reputelfigueroa has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 13,250
vCash: 500
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Join Date: Oct 2005
   
06-27-2019, 07:01 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Straightpool_99 View Post
That's some bunny-boiling level of crazyness. I guess caution is adviced on this sub forum.

oh no.

That was in the Main Forum though he frequents this neighborhood too.

Lou Figueroa
I not going to
be ignored, Lou
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
BC21
Poolology

BC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond reputeBC21 has a reputation beyond repute
 
BC21's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,156
vCash: 500
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: West Virginia
   
06-27-2019, 07:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lfigueroa View Post
oh no.

That was in the Main Forum though he frequents this neighborhood too.

Lou Figueroa
I not going to
be ignored, Lou
Come on, Lou... I've just never seen windows with those types of locks! No biggie. Lol


POOLOLOGY
YouTube
Brian Crist
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
Dan White
AzB Silver Member
Dan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond repute
 
Dan White's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,825
vCash: 500
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Oct 2005
   
06-27-2019, 12:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfleinen View Post
Well gee, thanks for the correction on an obvious typo and autocorrect (and yes, autocorrect did bite me here). I honestly don't think you want to get into correcting anyone's grammar here, least of all me.
Hell, I could give you 20 to 26 in the alphabet in a spelling bee! j/k It wasn't obvious at all. I'm sure many people think it is supposed to be "metered," which is the reason I pointed it out.

Quote:
What's pertinent is that during my hiatus from these forums, there was a constant stream of feedback of what was going on AzB on social media, and the same handful of names kept coming up. Along with the ones discussed in this thread, yours was one of them. And I have to say, it surprised the hell out of me, because I remember you from the 14.1 subforum as being the opposite of what I heard. How you got so wound up in the aiming system controversy -- and for so long -- is beyond me. So I would be careful in thinking you sit with the "sane" or in some neutral position to judge.
So you heard about me most likely from guys like Spider and cookie. I'm no different in the straight pool forum than I am here. It's just that there are far fewer controversial subjects over there. It seems you have a skewed view of my involvement here. I'll give you my take on the problem when I have a little more time and then maybe you can weigh both "sides" and see if you still think I have horns.


Dan White
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25)
Dan White
AzB Silver Member
Dan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond repute
 
Dan White's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,825
vCash: 500
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Oct 2005
   
06-27-2019, 03:52 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfleinen View Post
And I have to say, it surprised the hell out of me, because I remember you from the 14.1 subforum as being the opposite of what I heard. How you got so wound up in the aiming system controversy -- and for so long -- is beyond me. So I would be careful in thinking you sit with the "sane" or in some neutral position to judge.

-Sean
OK, I spent some time thinking how to best respond to this without writing a novel that probably wouldn't change any minds anyway. In a nutshell, some people love CTE Pro1 and swear by it. Stan explains how it is supposed to work, but video analysis of Stan shooting shows that his explanations are often dubious (BTW, Stan was kind enough to label me "Dubious Dan." When he realized I liked the nickname he came back with two or three really nasty ones, but I digress). So for me it's an interesting problem to study. Stan calls it "a mystery that was never supposed to be." That, of course, is the reference to the method working because the table has 2x1 dimensions. But, in the end, some people play well with it and I am happy that they are satisfied. I've often said that I wish Stan's system worked objectively and that every shot was the same as a straight in. I'd buy the first 10 books from Stan and give them out. It's not about any kind of grudge or ego thing. Look at my posts back in time and I've often said things like this.

There are a great many unproven and unanswered claims swirling around CTE Pro1. By "unanswered" I mean a real answer and not "it's been explained to you a dozen times already," or "you don't know anything because you haven't put in the table time," or "go back 5 years and you'll find the answer," and so on. I'm talking about an answer that would pass mustard (threw that in there so you could correct me, ) at an engineering firm. In other words, a real answer. The more recent one (like for the last three years) is that it will be explained in the upcoming book. OK, but if the answer is known do we really have to wait another year (?) for a book?

How to illustrate? I more or less at random picked a few comments made in the last few days. These are interesting questions and none have been answered. I don't obsess over these things, I don't post here every day, but I am interested in the whole controversy and would ultimately like to see both sides agree on what is really going on. In order for that to happen, both sides need to make an honest effort and I don't think that is happening.

Now on to some examples:

https://forums.azbilliards.com/showp...&postcount=255

morht seems to be saying that all of his shots track to center pocket, allowing for small stroke inaccuracies. In the post above, Brian points out the ramifications if that were true. So question for Sean: Do you think CTE automatically puts the ball in center pocket for the whole range of shots, sharper and sharper, until you have to switch over to the next perception?

Next,
https://forums.azbilliards.com/showt...ighlight=throw

I posted this a long time ago but it still goes unanswered. It is self-explanatory but to recap: Stan does not realize that the ball is throwing a very significant amount, enough that many shots will be missed if hit at the wrong speed. What do you think?

In a related topic, Stan answered my post above by shimming the pockets and demonstrating that he could pocket balls using CTE. I'm the nitpicker in the video, here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiwvH_3A7pY

Two things wrong with this. It is supposed to refute the idea that the ball throws at different speeds. Problem 1: In the video where Stan's ball does throw, it is clear that he is fixated on assuring identical strokes with every shot. I believe he lost sight of where in the pocket the ball was actually going, so it went where it should, depending on the shot speed. In the shimmed pocket video, the cat is already out of the bag. If the test subject, Stan in this case, knows what the outcome is supposed to be, it is an invalid test. Meaningless. If you have any background in science this is a 101 level concept. Problem 2: The whole video is a straw man argument. He says that my complaint was that the ob did not go perfectly in the center of the pocket. Stan says that the eyes can pick out the exact spot to hit, but the body has physical limitations and cannot execute perfectly, but can execute to a professional level. This has absolutely nothing to do with the issue. The balls in my video did not go center pocket because of throw. I made the point that the throw effect happens twice almost exactly the same because Stan is a high level player. See the difference? It's another non-answer.

Last one,
https://forums.azbilliards.com/showp...&postcount=189

I don't know anything about DTL other than his name is Duke, he shoots damn good straight pool, and he believes his aiming system won't work on a table that is not 2x1. Here's a kind of wise-guy question but I want to make sure I understand what you guys really mean with the 2x1 table stuff: Put the cb on the head spot and the ob at center table, about a half ball hit. Cut the ob in the far right pocket using CTE on a 2x1 table. OK, now set up the balls again but before you get down to shoot I'm going to take a circular saw and lop off 6 inches from the playing surface from head rail to foot rail on the left side of the table. Now you have a 2.3x1 ratio table. Using CTE go ahead and shoot this shot again. What will happen (and don't tell me the table will fall over, lol)?

So these are the kinds of things that interest me. I spent a fair amount of time here trying to explain my point of view in a concise way because I think my involvement in this forum has been unfairly characterized. I'm hoping this gives you a better idea of my motivation, and that you will give some thought to these kinds of questions.


Dan White
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#26)
BeiberLvr
AzB Silver Member
BeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond reputeBeiberLvr has a reputation beyond repute
 
BeiberLvr's Avatar
 
Status: Online
Posts: 7,895
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Florida
   
06-27-2019, 05:01 PM

Dan,

Here's the deal.

As someone that has used and may continue to use CTE from time to time. I do believe it is a subjective system, and I think your questions (at one time) were fair.

However, to say they haven't been answered isn't true. The issue that you (and others) have is that the answers haven't been to your liking.

That doesn't mean the answers are right, but the CTE folk aren't trying to mislead you. They simply answered your questions to the best of their ability. If you aren't satisfied with the answers, then asking over and over again won't change that.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#27)
Dan White
AzB Silver Member
Dan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond repute
 
Dan White's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,825
vCash: 500
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Oct 2005
   
06-27-2019, 05:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeiberLvr View Post
Dan,

Here's the deal.

As someone that has used and may continue to use CTE from time to time. I do believe it is a subjective system, and I think your questions (at one time) were fair.

However, to say they haven't been answered isn't true. The issue that you (and others) have is that the answers haven't been to your liking.

That doesn't mean the answers are right, but the CTE folk aren't trying to mislead you. They simply answered your questions to the best of their ability. If you aren't satisfied with the answers, then asking over and over again won't change that.
I disagree. These things have been given vague, half-hearted treatment in the past, at best. I appreciate where you are coming from, and that you came to what I think is a rational conclusion about subjectivity. Let's look at that link I provided about throw from nearly 2 years ago, here:

https://forums.azbilliards.com/showt...ighlight=throw

I'll try to paraphrase and distill the responses from CTE users as best I can:

mohrt's reply: throw exists but overcut is a red herring... I don't think about throw. Maybe Stan can clarify about overcut. (never happened)

mohrt's 2nd reply: refers to Stan's second video that is a straw man and irrelevant.

Beiber's reply: a wise crack (presumably before you came over to the dark side).

Neil's reply: blah blah blah (literally that's what he said) more ridicule.

greyghost's reply: sarcasm (in his case I'll give him a break because he's a trip).

sixpack's reply: interesting but a red herring... doesn't really matter.

That it. So do you consider these to be 6 "answers" to my presentation? To me they look more like attacks and attempts to minimize the findings. Mohrt came close when he thought Stan should clarify, but sadly the clarification came in the form of another video (already discussed) that almost intentionally seems to muddy the waters with straw man arguments.

So you say they are not being misleading, but what do you call it when everybody seems afraid to admit the obvious?

What is your opinion? Stan says that balls do not throw at different speeds when using CTE Pro1. Do you agree? Oh, and it just isn't that they throw the same amount. He says they don't throw AT ALL. At slow speeds there isn't enough friction "built up" and at fast speeds the contact time is too fast for there to be throw to adjust for.


Dan White
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#28)
Boxcar
AzB Silver Member
Boxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond reputeBoxcar has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Online
Posts: 281
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jan 2019
   
06-27-2019, 06:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeiberLvr View Post
Dan,

Here's the deal.

As someone that has used and may continue to use CTE from time to time. I do believe it is a subjective system, and I think your questions (at one time) were fair.

However, to say they haven't been answered isn't true. The issue that you (and others) have is that the answers haven't been to your liking.

That doesn't mean the answers are right, but the CTE folk aren't trying to mislead you. They simply answered your questions to the best of their ability. If you aren't satisfied with the answers, then asking over and over again won't change that.
If I walk up to a guy and ask him, "How much is 4 + 4?" and he answers, "9" then as a person with an elementary understanding of mathematics, it wouldn't be unusual for me to question his answer. He may genuinely believe that his answer is correct, but a belief is rarely substantial to the test of universal truth. Beliefs can lead to truths, but they must first be subjected to intense, open, honest and often aggravated scrutiny.

Just because our country believed in and thrived on the institution of slavery in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, didn't make slavery right. Wars have been fought in search of the truth. We are adult enough to know that CTE is just another fart in the whirlwinds of time. To be afraid to subject it to tireless, systematic, and ethical scrutiny, is to admit in advance that it has little merit and can not stand up to the tests of time.

The tragedy is that the twenty year old debate on the topic of CTE has been argued by constituents unable to divorce emotion from reason. Zealots rarely make honorable, rational arbiters. To expect that just because a question is asked and an answer is given can, by and of itself, yield a conclusion is at best imprudent and at the worst, completely unrealistic.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#29)
sfleinen
14.1 & One Pocket Addict
sfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond reputesfleinen has a reputation beyond repute
 
sfleinen's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,683
vCash: 4100
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carmel, NY (1.5-hour north of Manhattan)
   
06-28-2019, 05:16 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan White View Post
[...]
So question for Sean: Do you think CTE automatically puts the ball in center pocket for the whole range of shots, sharper and sharper, until you have to switch over to the next perception?
[...]
Dan:

Much like you did these huge snips of my posts, and only quoted/answered one sentence, I'm going to do the same. My answer to the above is "I don't care."

You are trying to engage me in yet another aiming system soiree, when I have made it clear -- in another reply to you -- that these days, I don't care about aiming systems anymore. Rationale: 1.) I've come to accept that aiming systems are useful for people who unlike me, cannot use the traditional ghostball, CP-to-CP, fractional, or back-of-ball methods. They obviously work, because folks like Tyler Styer (as just one example) prove it through execution. 2.) I don't NEED to understand an aiming system that doesn't "jive" with me. My issue is getting time on the table, not what's in my head. 3.) That all this banter and analysis of aiming systems is just tilting at windmills. For all the time you guys spend analyzing, "discussing," bantering, arguing, etc., if you spent that same amount of time at the table, boy-oh-boy I think you'd start to see the improvement in play that you seek. Having full-time jobs as an information security consultant during the week and as an arborist on the weekends, I don't have time to be "armchair experting" (yes, I intentionally used that word as a verb to show the silliness) on topics that would more quickly be answered by purchasing Stan's product or seeking personal instruction. You want the answer that badly? Pony up. This is the pool world -- do as what other people do and open your wallet when you want to learn something.

And about that "name" thing I mentioned in a previous post, here's the thing to help drive my point home. When I go to a pool event, say, SBE/SBX, I can comfortably mix with any crowd, including CTE'ers, and get along famously. People appreciate seeing and spending time with me. Can you say the same?

-Sean


"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." -Isaac Asimov

"They haven't got brains, any of them, only grey fluff that's blown into their heads by mistake, and they don't think." -Eeyore, The House at Pooh Corner
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#30)
Dan White
AzB Silver Member
Dan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond reputeDan White has a reputation beyond repute
 
Dan White's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,825
vCash: 500
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Oct 2005
   
06-28-2019, 06:24 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfleinen View Post
Dan:

Much like you did these huge snips of my posts, and only quoted/answered one sentence, I'm going to do the same. My answer to the above is "I don't care."
Not sure what's wrong with that. I try to include only those portions I am responding to for clarity.

Quote:
You are trying to engage me in yet another aiming system soiree, when I have made it clear -- in another reply to you -- that these days, I don't care about aiming systems anymore.
Like I said in the post above, my purpose was to inform you of my point of view on the subject directly, rather than you hearing what a horrible person I must be from what I consider nut jobs on this particular subject. I was not intentionally trying to rope you into something you don't care to discuss. Maybe I should not have asked you to answer those questions. Again, I surmise that you may agree with at least some of my points and therefore might realize that your impression of my involvement is skewed. Maybe that's why you were shocked when you heard those things about me. There's not much else to say.

Quote:
And about that "name" thing I mentioned in a previous post, here's the thing to help drive my point home. When I go to a pool event, say, SBE/SBX, I can comfortably mix with any crowd, including CTE'ers, and get along famously. People appreciate seeing and spending time with me. Can you say the same?

-Sean
Not sure what the name thing is but I don't hate anybody and I rarely hold a grudge. I'd be perfectly happy hanging out with Stan as it has never been a personal thing for me (until it got personal a few times). I'm actually online friends with a number of people who pretty much hate each other, lol.

I think I nearly met you at an SBE years ago. I had just met Steve K and his wife at the straight pool table and hung out there for awhile. I left to go home and on my way out a guy I think was you passed me. I was going to introduce myself but you were moving kind of fast and I was headed out anyway.

I agree 100% about playing more pool, which is what i have been doing the last couple of months. I don't post much here now except the last few days. Believe me, aiming is the least of my issues. I am just interested in the subject and the answers. If you are not, then that is your choice not to care.

I'm a lawn nut but have been learning more about trees. I had 10 evergreens put in the yard 5 years ago. I also managed to grow a giant sequoia here in NJ. Two of them. They made it to about 2' tall before succumbing. Oh well, I tried.


Dan White
  
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 3 12 3

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.