Highest run
Old
  (#1)
chart22
AzB Silver Member
chart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond repute
 
chart22's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 105
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Vidor, Texas
   
Highest run - 10-17-2019, 03:45 PM

Does anyone know what the highest run on a table with 4.5” pockets is? Charles
  
Reply With Quote

Old
  (#2)
Bob Jewett
Northern California

Bob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond reputeBob Jewett has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 16,866
vCash: 1700
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
   
10-17-2019, 07:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chart22 View Post
Does anyone know what the highest run on a table with 4.5” pockets is? Charles
Competition or practice?

4.5x9 or some other size?

Witnessed or rumored?

Recorded or just witnessed?

You may want to consider Joshua Filler's 285 at the 2019 DCC 14.1 Challenge. It was on a 4.5x9 Diamond with 4.5" corner pockets. There is video of it. It was done under official rules -- "all ball fouls" -- although it was not a match.


Bob Jewett
SF Billiard Academy
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
AtLarge
AzB Gold Member
AtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Online
Posts: 10,958
vCash: 500
iTrader: 77 / 100%
Join Date: Apr 2008
   
10-17-2019, 09:49 PM

I've tried to get information a few times on Thomas Engert's run of 491 on a 9-foot table -- when, where, table details, spectators, etc.? sfleinen provided some good info a few months ago. Based on a now-gone Engert website, and a conversation with him at an early Dragon 14.1 event, Sean said it was "a Dynamic-II table with tour-cut pockets." But I still don't know the actual pocket size.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
chart22
AzB Silver Member
chart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond repute
 
chart22's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 105
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Vidor, Texas
   
10-18-2019, 04:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Jewett View Post
Competition or practice?

4.5x9 or some other size?

Witnessed or rumored?

Recorded or just witnessed?

You may want to consider Joshua Filler's 285 at the 2019 DCC 14.1 Challenge. It was on a 4.5x9 Diamond with 4.5" corner pockets. There is video of it. It was done under official rules -- "all ball fouls" -- although it was not a match.
9’
Recorded

I did watch the Filler run. He plays fast. I also watched a high run by Chris Melling also.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
chart22
AzB Silver Member
chart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond repute
 
chart22's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 105
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Vidor, Texas
   
10-18-2019, 04:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtLarge View Post
I've tried to get information a few times on Thomas Engert's run of 491 on a 9-foot table -- when, where, table details, spectators, etc.? sfleinen provided some good info a few months ago. Based on a now-gone Engert website, and a conversation with him at an early Dragon 14.1 event, Sean said it was "a Dynamic-II table with tour-cut pockets." But I still don't know the actual pocket size.
491 on pro cut pockets would be amazing to me.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
sjm
Stu with the Ko brothers
sjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond repute
 
sjm's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 15,901
vCash: 525
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
   
10-18-2019, 06:50 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtLarge View Post
I've tried to get information a few times on Thomas Engert's run of 491 on a 9-foot table -- when, where, table details, spectators, etc.? sfleinen provided some good info a few months ago. Based on a now-gone Engert website, and a conversation with him at an early Dragon 14.1 event, Sean said it was "a Dynamic-II table with tour-cut pockets." But I still don't know the actual pocket size.
I believe this to be the answer.. Engert's run, which was over fifteen years ago, of 491, which I, too, discussed with him, was not on silly tight equipment, but was on 4 1/2" pockets. Terms like tour-cut and pro-cut pockets need to be dismissed as their meaning changes with time.

Engert, a many time winner of the European Straight Pool Championships, was a world beater. He played a bit below Oliver Ortmann, but was certainly comparable to any other European straight pooler off his day.

The tail end of Engert's career coincided with the beginning of that of Thorsten Hohmann, and they had a memorable clash in the finals of the 2006 WPA Sanctioned World 14.1 Championships, which was won by Hohmann.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
arnaldo
AzB Silver Member
arnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond reputearnaldo has a reputation beyond repute
 
arnaldo's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 687
vCash: 500
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Join Date: Apr 2012
   
10-18-2019, 10:16 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjm View Post
The tail end of Engert's career coincided with the beginning of that of Thorsten Hohmann, and they had a memorable clash in the finals of the 2006 WPA Sanctioned World 14.1 Championships, which was won by Hohmann.
Here's the full match of that memorable 2006 final between Engert and Hohmann:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc_TRDv7GRw

Arnaldo


“When the action starts, it may not go the way you planned, and you’re down to your reflexes. That’s where your roadwork shows . . . If you cheated on that in the dark of the morning, well, you’re gonna get found out now, under the bright lights.” – Joe “Smokin’ Joe” Frazier
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
chart22
AzB Silver Member
chart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond reputechart22 has a reputation beyond repute
 
chart22's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 105
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Vidor, Texas
   
10-18-2019, 10:31 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjm View Post
I believe this to be the answer.. Engert's run, which was over fifteen years ago, of 491, which I, too, discussed with him, was not on silly tight equipment, but was on 4 1/2" pockets. Terms like tour-cut and pro-cut pockets need to be dismissed as their meaning changes with time.

Engert, a many time winner of the European Straight Pool Championships, was a world beater. He played a bit below Oliver Ortmann, but was certainly comparable to any other European straight pooler off his day.

The tail end of Engert's career coincided with the beginning of that of Thorsten Hohmann, and they had a memorable clash in the finals of the 2006 WPA Sanctioned World 14.1 Championships, which was won by Hohmann.
491 on 4.5” pockets is mind blowing to me.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Poolmanis
AzB Silver Member
Poolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond reputePoolmanis has a reputation beyond repute
 
Poolmanis's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,409
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Oulu, Finland
   
10-18-2019, 02:33 PM

EPBF pro cut pockets are 11.5 cm. which is 4.5"


-special man for a special shots-
Straight Pool addict
My Snooker 147 with Pool Cue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRtIEF_vL0A
HOW TO RUN RACKS IN 14.1 - Livestreamed with 103 run.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgnCaoYpzaM
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
AtLarge
AzB Gold Member
AtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond reputeAtLarge has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Online
Posts: 10,958
vCash: 500
iTrader: 77 / 100%
Join Date: Apr 2008
   
10-18-2019, 09:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poolmanis View Post
EPBF pro cut pockets are 11.5 cm. which is 4.5"
11.5 mm = 4.53"

Were the EPBF specs the same back when Engert ran his 491? Do you know what year that was?

I found the "2018 EPBF Sports Regulations" document, and it says: "The sports equipment must meet the specifications listed in the EPBF Specifications Catalogue ..." http://europeanpocketbilliardfederat...v-02.01.18.pdf

So then I found the EPBF "Equipment Specification Catalogue," version 01.03.2017, and on the Tables pages it just lists tables that are "recognized" -- maker and model -- but says nothing about pocket specs. http://europeanpocketbilliardfederat...01.03.2017.pdf

Most, but not all, of that EPBF spec catalog repeats what's in the WPA Equipment Specifications document. But the WPA document, unlike the EPBF document, has a section on pocket openings and measurements. The WPA spec for a corner pocket mouth is 4.5" to 4.625". Maybe all of the EPBF "recognized" tables follow the WPA specs?

Edit -- I just found the 2019 version of the "EPBF Sports Regulations" document, and it is a bit different from the one for 2018. The 2019 one says "The sports equipment must meet the specifications listed in the Apendexx 1, ...", but I haven't found that appendix. I wonder if it actually gives specs rather than just listing recognized makes and models. http://europeanpocketbilliardfederat...ns-v.-2019.pdf

Last edited by AtLarge; 10-18-2019 at 09:49 PM.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
sjm
Stu with the Ko brothers
sjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond reputesjm has a reputation beyond repute
 
sjm's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 15,901
vCash: 525
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
   
10-19-2019, 03:29 PM

A thread was started in 2006 in which the question was posed: Was Engert's run on a 9 x 4 1/2 more impressive than Mosconi's 526 on an 8 footer?

I'm only guessing here but I think Engert's run came in about 2003, so it wasn't old news at the time of this thread, and it's no too far fetched to believe that the poster who began this thread saw the run. Not exactly proof, but one small piece of evidence supporting the claim of 4 1/2" pockets.

Here it is:

https://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=36791
  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.