Never been to a university, huh?Let's void the U.S. constitution while we are at it too! Isn't that what the liberals in our universities are teaching today?
pj
chgo
Never been to a university, huh?Let's void the U.S. constitution while we are at it too! Isn't that what the liberals in our universities are teaching today?
OK this is exactly why I defend Mosconi- to debunk these myths- truth is as a youngster, I was at several of his exhibitions in the early 60s and my Dad had close friends who were room owners where he did exhibitions- there was NO special WAX at that time being applied to pool balls for Mosconi- what crap! Also, no tables were specially rigged for pocket size prior to Mosconi's exhibitions, another B.S. myth. the only thing he did not do was perform exhibitions on super tight "house" tables that were usually near the counter in only some rooms, which made perfect sense, as it was an exhibition. Grady Matthews is on record for making several negative comments about Mosconi- you can listen to him on some of his 14.1 US Open commentary where he "informs" people that Mosconi "claimed the world title in years where there was no world tournament. Grady also suggests in some of his commentary that Harold Worst was better than Mosconi, and that Mosconi had no gamble in him at all- I don't know Grady's issue with Mosconi, but he clearly seemed to have one from his own words that i have heard.
On the flip side, we have the posters who still don't appreciate Mosconi's achievement or John's effort. If the record was easy to break, John wouldn't be the only one attempting.
Really? I don't see many people out there saying Mosconi's decades-old record of 526 is not impressive.
By contrast, there are many posters disparaging Schmidt's attempt and saying no run he could manufacture could ever compare to Mosconi.
Here are some quotes, just from this thread alone. I didn't bother using forum search, as the same arguments are re-hashed.
Mosconi did it on an 8 foot home table with big pockets and slow cloth.
The record needs to move on as conditions are incomparable.
Yes Mr. Black Balled and it appears as though internet forums are PERFECT for guys like you!
the reason no other pros are attempting is the lack of financial incentive to do so. the firepower is there, we saw that at the derby straight pool challenge..
Grady was much closer to Willie's age and competed in the same tournaments and same era. I would say he saw things through the same eyes during that time frame.
You, yourself say, you were a kid when you witnessed some of the exhibitions. I would say your way of seeing things may have been a little different than the actual competitors. Wouldn't you? Kids always seem to put their heroes on a pedestal.
Grady may have had a personal beef with Willie but that would be between them. Many others have said that Harold Worst may have been the best player ever. He died young so who knows what he may have done if he got to play longer?
Willie Mosconi was arguably and on paper the best 14.1 player to live on our planet. His record stands to this day at 526.
I believe some day, this record like all others will be beat. Will it be John Schmidt? I don't know. He seems to be the only one actively trying.
All this back and forth about table size, lighting, condition of balls.....BS! If somebody runs 527 or more with witnesses, it will stand as the new record. Period!
I will point out one thing that you mention above. Willie avoided the "tight" house table which made perfect sense. Were those the tables with 4.5" pockets which were considered tight back in the 60"s?
John has had many runs over 150 on Diamond tables that fit the description. Nowadays we just call those "pro cut" pockets.
JMHO
tough Italian neighborhood where there was great pride in the legends of Dimaggio, Marciano, and Mosconi - tremendous pride that these 3 were the very best at their sport! I played ball, boxed, and played a lot of pool- all three from a very early age. There was great pride in our neighborhood, and I want to keep Mosconi's name from being disgraced on this site, as I see from time to time that people just either forget, or really never knew what these great sports figure had to go through to be the champions they were
does ANYBODY on this site who really knows this game think that Mosconi could NOT have run way, way more than 526 if that was his goal- of course he could.
Are you one of those guys like Chris Mad Dog Russo who refuses to believe that their heroes growing up can ever be mentioned in the same sentence as the greats of today's game? You guys are worst, and I say that in a nice way. I bet if someone were to out hit DiMaggio's record you would start complaining that the conditions were so different back then compared to today, so it wouldn't count, right?
Please let me set the record straight here, I wish JS all the accolades he deserves if he runs526+. No issue with me at all. I will give anyone their due if they break a long standing sports record. A lot of people jump on me here when I try to point out just facts period- facts that I know to be true. All of that aside- Good luck to JS and any major league ballplayer who gets to 57consecutive game hitting streak- my own heroes don't need me to stand up for their accomplishments, for sure, but I have as much right as anyone on this forum to point out what I believe to be truths and falsehoods being stated herein. Somebody here asked me why I use the Mosconi name in this forum and i explained it from my own background growing up- I never stated that any of those records could or should not be broken- I take nothing away form anyone who is successful at that attempt.
About any "demands" Mosconi might have made, maybe Grady was just mistaken.
The reason I say that is because each time I saw Mosconi give an exhibition he brought his own set of balls. They looked polished up. So IOWs, the room wasn't providing him the balls.
And on several occasions I saw put on his exhibition at a room at which 1pocket was the main game and he played on the front "money table which had the tightest pockets in the room. He ran 100 each time and all the regulars murmured about how easy he made that table look.
Lou Figueroa
Grady was much closer to Willie's age and competed in the same tournaments and same era. I would say he saw things through the same eyes during that time frame.
You, yourself say, you were a kid when you witnessed some of the exhibitions. I would say your way of seeing things may have been a little different than the actual competitors. Wouldn't you? Kids always seem to put their heroes on a pedestal.
Grady may have had a personal beef with Willie but that would be between them. Many others have said that Harold Worst may have been the best player ever. He died young so who knows what he may have done if he got to play longer?
Willie Mosconi was arguably and on paper the best 14.1 player to live on our planet. His record stands to this day at 526.
I believe some day, this record like all others will be beat. Will it be John Schmidt? I don't know. He seems to be the only one actively trying.
All this back and forth about table size, lighting, condition of balls.....BS! If somebody runs 527 or more with witnesses, it will stand as the new record. Period!
I will point out one thing that you mention above. Willie avoided the "tight" house table which made perfect sense. Were those the tables with 4.5" pockets which were considered tight back in the 60"s?
John has had many runs over 150 on Diamond tables that fit the description. Nowadays we just call those "pro cut" pockets.
JMHO
Grady Mathews says in his book "Bet High and Kiss Low" that Mosconi demanded waxed balls and 5 inch pockets at his exhibitions. What about that... do you think Grady was lying in his book?
Furthermore, Grady says that when he himself gave a clinic or exhibition, part of his deal was that if he didn't run a hundred balls at the exhibition, there was no charge to the proprietor. What about that....do you think Grady was lying there too?
(Just an inquiry...not wanting trouble from you since you grew up in a 'rough Italian neighborhood' and can probably beat up everybody.)
I wasn't at the Derby, what were the high runs?
Willie brought his own balls to every exhibition I ever witnessed. He would play on the table (Brunswicks, usually Gold Crowns) that had the most room for viewing. All he asked for was good cloth and a clean table that had been set up properly. If he hit balls on the table prior to the match and it had any bad roll offs he would demand to play on another table, as well he should. I never saw or heard him complain about the pockets, standard Gold Crown sizing being what he usually played on (4.75-5").
Typically his pre-match routine was to set up some of his trick shots to make sure he could make them all right on the particular table. He liked to make them on the first try.
First of all, Grady was a couple of generations behind Willie, about thirty years younger in fact. He NEVER played in any tournaments Willie played in! Grady came up in the 60's, just like me, and Willie only played one tournament in the 60's in Burbank, CA in 1966. He lost to Joe Balsis and Grady was not entered or invited. Grady was NOT a top Straight Pool player, nowhere near the best of his era. Guys like Mizerak, Mike Sigel, Ray Martin, Jim Rempe, Nick Varner, Dallas West and a dozen others would eat him alive at 14.1!
The only place he could guarantee a 100 ball run was in his own mind. Grady tended to be a bitter man when he felt somehow offended and that could happen rather easily. One thing he was correct about is that several of Willie's so called "World Championships" were achieved by winning a challenge match against a single opponent. Of course these opponents were guys like Irving Crane, Jimmy Caras and Andrew Ponzi, no slouches themselves.
Harold Worst was one of the greatest players to ever live, but he also never competed against Willie in a tournament. Harold was probably 10-15 years older than Grady and 20 years younger than Willie. In Pool, every ten years is a new generation.