Old
  (#31)
PRED
AzB Silver Member
PRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond repute
 
PRED's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 11,409
vCash: 600
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Join Date: Mar 2013
   
11-25-2019, 07:13 PM

QPQ is not illegal


IRATUS VULGUS
  
Reply With Quote

Old
  (#32)
UGOTDA7
Ban pending.....
UGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond repute
 
UGOTDA7's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 22,661
vCash: 500
iTrader: 21 / 96%
Join Date: Jun 2004
   
11-25-2019, 07:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasShooter View Post
Read the transcripts. If you have trouble reading, thereís video of the hearings.
I'm sorry the question was too tough for you.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#33)
UGOTDA7
Ban pending.....
UGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond repute
 
UGOTDA7's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 22,661
vCash: 500
iTrader: 21 / 96%
Join Date: Jun 2004
   
11-25-2019, 07:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasShooter View Post
Hereís a pretty simple excerpt from the testimony. I hope itís simple enough. First hand.

"I know that members of this Committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a 'quid pro quo?' As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes," Sondland said. He laid the blame for masterminding the quid pro quo at the feet of Rudy Giuliani, the president's personal attorney.

"Mr. Giuliani conveyed to Secretary Perry, Ambassador Volker, and others that President Trump wanted a public statement from President Zelensky committing to investigations of Burisma and the 2016 election," Sondland said, adding that Giuliani also conveyed these messages to Ukrainian officials. "We all understood that these prerequisites for the White House call and White House meeting reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."
You poor guy - it's tough carrying water for the lying, cheating, stealing democrats isn't it...but by all means keep trying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnEW...ature=emb_logo

WATCH: Rep. Michael Turnerís full questioning of Gordon Sondland | Trump impeachment hearings
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#34)
TexasShooter
AzB Silver Member
TexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 735
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
   
11-25-2019, 07:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGOTDA7 View Post
You poor guy - it's tough carrying water for the lying, cheating, stealing democrats isn't it...but by all means keep trying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnEW...ature=emb_logo

WATCH: Rep. Michael Turnerís full questioning of Gordon Sondland | Trump impeachment hearings
You may want to watch this full segment after your snippet. The dems lawyer destroys the, oh, I was just assuming, defense. Emails can be a real downer sometimes. He sure was thirsty during that segment.

https://youtu.be/2mHCMQzNnEY
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#35)
UGOTDA7
Ban pending.....
UGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond repute
 
UGOTDA7's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 22,661
vCash: 500
iTrader: 21 / 96%
Join Date: Jun 2004
   
11-25-2019, 08:12 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasShooter View Post
You may want to watch this full segment after your snippet. The dems lawyer destroys the, oh, I was just assuming, defense. Emails can be a real downer sometimes. He sure was thirsty during that segment.

https://youtu.be/2mHCMQzNnEY
Keep trying...that water is getting heavy on you I can tell.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#36)
TexasShooter
AzB Silver Member
TexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 735
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
   
11-25-2019, 08:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGOTDA7 View Post
Keep trying...that water is getting heavy on you I can tell.
Is that you giving up?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#37)
UGOTDA7
Ban pending.....
UGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond reputeUGOTDA7 has a reputation beyond repute
 
UGOTDA7's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 22,661
vCash: 500
iTrader: 21 / 96%
Join Date: Jun 2004
   
11-25-2019, 08:55 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasShooter View Post
Is that you giving up?
Giving up what?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#38)
LWW
DEPLORABLE!
LWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond reputeLWW has a reputation beyond repute
 
LWW's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 56,170
vCash: 1700
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Blog Entries: 8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: People's Republic of Amerika
   
11-26-2019, 06:30 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom haney View Post
I wasn't afraid to watch the hearings. I watched the hearings to see President Trump vindicated.
What I saw was a case laid out against him that he made a serious mistake and the phone call was a serious error in judgement.
Nunes and Jordan had an opportunity to explain to intelligent, non-partisan folks why he did this and why this isn't as serious as the Democrats are making it out to be.
Instead, they attacked the credibility of the presenters or simply ignored the accusations altogether and made it about the Bidens.
Why not do both?
If I accuse Joe Bob of being a liar and a thief and getting a contract out on my brother, his response should NOT be "I know you are, and what about that time you robbed that bank?"
He should try to defend HIS ACTIONS FIRST!
This is what Nunes and Jordan are doing. The hell with the accusations. If we throw enough poop on the wall and muddy the circumstances, the public, those that are paying any attention at all, won't know what to think.
It's working.
I'm sorry Tom, but I truly believe your mind was made up ahead of time and your support of Trump is, at best, a smokescreen helping you to survive in West Virginia.

I can't read your mind, and if I'm wrong I apologize ... but you know I'm a student of history.


"I can't stand you (LWW). You're one of the worst people I've ever known...You can rot in hell you pathetic loser."
-Bishop-

"Whether or not its a lie is irrelevant."
-Bishop-

"I have better things to do than worry about fact checking whats being published ..."
-336Robin-

"I support Antifa"
-poolfool1957-

"I have high hopes that you (LWW) and your sympathizers will be led to the gallows."
-9BallPaul-
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#39)
TexasShooter
AzB Silver Member
TexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 735
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
   
11-26-2019, 06:47 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGOTDA7 View Post
Giving up what?
I watched your video and responded with a video disproving yours. You responded without watching it so I accept your defeat.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#40)
time to play no
AzB Silver Member
time to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond reputetime to play no has a reputation beyond repute
 
time to play no's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,173
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: central NC
   
11-26-2019, 06:51 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGOTDA7 View Post
You poor guy - it's tough carrying water for the lying, cheating, stealing democrats isn't it...but by all means keep trying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnEW...ature=emb_logo

WATCH: Rep. Michael Turner’s full questioning of Gordon Sondland | Trump impeachment hearings
I like this tard's(TS) condescending tone with you. Classic case of stupid thinking that everyone is.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#41)
TexasShooter
AzB Silver Member
TexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 735
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
   
11-26-2019, 06:59 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by time to play no View Post
I like this tard's(TS) condescending tone with you. Classic case of stupid thinking that everyone is.
I see you’re attempting to prove your point with your post. Well done.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#42)
Smooth
AzB Silver Member
Smooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Online
Posts: 3,121
vCash: 500
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Join Date: Aug 2010
   
11-26-2019, 08:08 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasShooter View Post
I watched your video and responded with a video disproving yours. You responded without watching it so I accept your defeat.
Sondland was referring to a quid pro quo for a WH meeting.... not for the aid money, but for a meeting... you are out of your depth
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#43)
TexasShooter
AzB Silver Member
TexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 735
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
   
11-26-2019, 08:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
Sondland was referring to a quid pro quo for a WH meeting.... not for the aid money, but for a meeting... you are out of your depth
You aren’t even in the pool. The quid pro quo was the meeting in return for the announcement.
There were 2 quid pro quo’s. Meeting for announcement and money for announcement. No announcement and no meeting or money.

Last edited by TexasShooter; 11-26-2019 at 08:14 AM.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#44)
Smooth
AzB Silver Member
Smooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond reputeSmooth has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Online
Posts: 3,121
vCash: 500
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Join Date: Aug 2010
   
11-26-2019, 08:21 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasShooter View Post
You arenít even in the pool. The quid pro quo was the meeting in return for the announcement.
There were 2 quid pro quoís. Meeting for announcement and money for announcement. No announcement and no meeting or money.
and it is done daily, and has been for decades... so what is your point? that it is suddenly an impeachable offense? good luck with that
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#45)
TexasShooter
AzB Silver Member
TexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond reputeTexasShooter has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 735
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2019
   
11-26-2019, 08:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
and it is done daily, and has been for decades... so what is your point? that it is suddenly an impeachable offense? good luck with that
Are you completely clueless or just acting?

He did it for personal gain, not for the country. Thatís isnít done every day.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 5 123 45

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.