Go Back   AzBilliards.com > Main Category > Non Pool Related
Reload this Page If we allow them, they will socially homogenize the world...
Reply
Page 5 of 13 « First 345 67 Last »
 
Share Thread Tools Rate Thread
Welcome to Australia & France ref ugee....
Old
  (#61)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
Welcome to Australia & France ref ugee.... - 05-31-2016, 06:07 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uJjrKWaeDs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdmQ9PN57l4
  
Reply With Quote

Old
  (#62)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
06-02-2016, 07:59 AM

SELF-LOATHING IN THE WEST


Posted on 2nd June 2016 by Yojimbo in Economy

video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkfRkR1Pqag

The lack of a majority of individuals in the West willing to defend Western Civilization and the lack of an understanding of the value of it means that the battle to save it will be unnecessarily bloody and destructive.

How sad that so many are simply willing to throw it all away.


via The Rebel.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#63)
Casual Observer
Viva... yeah whatever
Casual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond reputeCasual Observer has a reputation beyond repute
 
Casual Observer's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 22,261
vCash: 4100
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: May 2006
   
06-02-2016, 08:04 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyg View Post
SELF-LOATHING IN THE WEST


Posted on 2nd June 2016 by Yojimbo in Economy

video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkfRkR1Pqag

The lack of a majority of individuals in the West willing to defend Western Civilization and the lack of an understanding of the value of it means that the battle to save it will be unnecessarily bloody and destructive.

How sad that so many are simply willing to throw it all away.


via The Rebel.
The so-called academic elites in the West have been "teaching" children that Western Civilization is the root of every evil for decades now.
Their fruit has finally ripened.
BTW- Who is John Galt?


"...And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw..."

Neil Peart

“...I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine...”
Atlas Shrugged
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#64)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 52,834
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
06-02-2016, 10:18 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyg View Post
SELF-LOATHING IN THE WEST


Posted on 2nd June 2016 by Yojimbo in Economy

video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkfRkR1Pqag

The lack of a majority of individuals in the West willing to defend Western Civilization and the lack of an understanding of the value of it means that the battle to save it will be unnecessarily bloody and destructive.

How sad that so many are simply willing to throw it all away.


via The Rebel.
Since we just finished another military-idolatry holiday where the military can do no wrong, I'd like to say that anyone who is willing to just throw it all away is dissing the military more than any flag-burner or 1%er or libertarian.

(This argument is first agreeing with the assumption by the statists that the troops are necessary and heroes in what they are charged to do.)

Think of how many soldiers died or were wounded (thinking they were) defending these liberties from "them" for "us" but then now it turns out that "we" don't give a crap about the liberties or the wounded or dead who thought they were defending those. Ouch!!!! It must really suck to be a vet with this total lack of honest appreciation from those protected.

Now THAT is dissing the troops 100%!!!!!!!


Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#65)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
06-04-2016, 05:09 AM

Homeland Security Using Private Contractor Vans to Transport and Release Illegal Aliens Inside the U.S.

June 4th, 2016

This gets a Florida tick because G4S has its U.S. headquarters in Jupiter.

Via: Judicial Watch:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is quietly transporting illegal immigrants from the Mexican border to Phoenix and releasing them without proper processing or issuing court appearance documents, Border Patrol sources tell Judicial Watch. The government classifies them as Other Than Mexican (OTM) and this week around 35 were transferred 116 miles north from Tucson to a Phoenix bus station where they went their separate way. Judicial Watch was present when one of the white vans carrying a group of OTMs arrived at the Phoenix Greyhound station on Buckeye Road.

The OTMs are from Honduras, Colombia, El Salvador and Guatemala and Border Patrol officials say this week’s batch was in custody for a couple of days and ordered to call family members in the U.S. so they could purchase a bus ticket for their upcoming trip from Phoenix. Authorities didn’t bother checking the identity of the U.S. relatives or if they’re in the country legally, according to a Border Patrol official directly involved in the matter. American taxpayers pick up the fare for those who claim to have a “credible fear,” Border Patrol sources told JW. None of the OTMs were issued official court appearance documents, but were told to “promise” they’d show up for a hearing when notified, said federal agents with firsthand knowledge of the operation.

A security company contracted by the U.S. government is driving the OTMs from the Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector where they were in custody to Phoenix, sources said. The firm is called G4S and claims to be the world’s leading security solutions group with operations in more than 100 countries and 610,000 employees. G4S has more than 50,000 employees in the U.S. and its domestic headquarters is in Jupiter, Florida. Judicial Watch is filing a number of public records requests to get more information involving the arrangement between G4S and the government, specifically the transport of illegal immigrants from the Mexican border to other parts of the country. The photo accompanying this story shows the uniformed G4S guard that transported the OTMs this week from Tucson to Phoenix.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#66)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 52,834
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
06-04-2016, 05:57 AM

lol....I'm sure if they build a wall, THEN they will do the will of the people.




But in the meantime, vote harder!







Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote
Welcome refugee....
Old
  (#67)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
Welcome refugee.... - 06-23-2016, 06:18 AM

Not Just Sweden



Hear about the Syrian "refugees" we let into the country.... Three of them, that raped a kid at knifepoint? Oh, for good measure and extra insult they *****ed on her afterward too.

Is that all over the mainstream media? Or any media?

Well, no.

And there is controversy -- sort of -- over the story.


See, they may not have been Syrian. And there might not have been a knife. But there apparently was a sexually-oriented attack on a young girl, by three middle-eastern refugees that we did let into the country, and who, it appears, have not been here long. And the media -- along with the cops and town council -- have tried to bury the story.

“They stripped her naked, and urinated in her mouth,” Odell told FoxNews.com, citing his conversations with the girl's family.


Neither the Twin Falls Police Department nor Loebs confirmed the details given by Odell. Loebs did confirm that the incident was reported on June 2, and that two juvenile suspects were finally charged Thursday and arrested a day later. The prosecutor did not say why just two arrests had been made, and said the case is sealed due to its sensitive nature and the minors involved.

Twin Falls Police Chief Craig Kingsbury told reporters the suspects are Iraqi and Sudanese. Loebs said he does not know how long they have been living in the United States.


Oh, and I bet you can guess their religion too.

Why not?

I pulled my original story on this due to the, uh, "controversy." Needless to say, my original article was -- for the most part -- correct. Does the exact nation of origin matter if the substance of the events is correct, and the obvious issue isn't the nationality of the perpetrators but rather the entire region's social "norms", centered on a set of beliefs that are fundamentally incompatible with civilized western society?


Specifically, a set of beliefs that anyone female is "lesser" and "to be subjugated" to the point that adult women must cover their bodies leaving only eye slits (otherwise they are "fair game" to be assaulted -- and it's their fault if they are and may even be charged criminally with adultery), that girls should have their clitorus removed (so they cannot enjoy sex, you see) by forced surgery, often performed without anesthesia, that it's not "rape" if the person assaulted (irrespective of age or gender!) is not of the "correct" religion, that being gay should be punished by death and more!


I think not. And I continue to maintain that such a set of "beliefs" is incompatible with Western Society and that by inviting said persons into our nation while demanding that the people walk around unarmed is to invite assaults of all sorts (including sexual assaults on young girls), and murder, including mass-murder.

PS: Those who sent "interesting" emails and similar "missives" on the original -- I'm not afraid of you.

PPS: Why has the media tried to bury this? It's not that hard to figure out. Americans may collectively refuse to eject all these jackwads because some of them scream "Allah Ackhbar!" while shooting up a military base, a recruiting center or even a gay bar and make excuses for same, but I am willing to bet that it will be a wee bit different when the attacks are of a sexual nature and perpetrated on young girls (or boys for that matter; see Afghanistan for that one.)
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#68)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
07-27-2016, 10:55 PM

The Law Of The Jungle Is Far Superior To The Ideology Of Globalism


Tyler Durden

Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

In 1991 George Bush Sr., in at least two separate speeches, announced an active geopolitical endgame for global stability; something he called the “New World Order.” This was not the first time the concept of the NWO had been uttered by a prominent figure. Fabian socialist H.G. Welles wrote an entire book on the ideology decades before, in 1940, entitled 'The New World Order', and even scripted a thinly veiled propaganda film on the rise of globalism titled 'Things To Come'. The core of this ideology is the institution of global governance and the erasure of sovereign nation states, ostensibly in order to end the persistent threat of world war.

A key quote from Bush’s White House speech to the nation on the eve of Operation Desert Storm in Iraq explains much behind the NWO concept:

“We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order — a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful — and we will be — we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.”


The questions are, what did he mean by the “rule of law,” and what did he mean by the “law of the jungle?” As Bush clarifies further, the “rule of law” in his mind is the law as enforced by a globalist governing body (i.e. the UN). The “law of the jungle” would invariably be everything that represents the opposite of globalism (i.e. wild and unshackled sovereignty).

The "law of the jungle" sounds harsh and unforgiving, and it is, for people who do not pursue greater imperatives and who do not work hard to reach their ultimate potential.
This idea is often misconstrued as "fascist" in its origins. That is to say, people commonly assume the law of the jungle is merely the subjugation of the weak by the strong. This is how the globalists WANT you to view sovereignty, national or tribal identity, individualism, etc.; they want you to see these principles as akin to savagery.

In truth, it is the elites that promote savagery as the core of globalism, though it is to be sure a highly sterilized and scientific form of savagery. Their "rule of law" is entirely arbitrary - it is not based in the light of conscience, but on darker desires of artificial advantage for the ruling class and the oppression of everyone else. A better interpretation of the law of the jungle would be that it is a more colorful description of "natural law", the inborn right of self determination guided by inherent conscience. Under natural law, bureaucratic governance serves little purpose. It becomes obsolete.

While the law of the jungle is not easy or carefree or eternally "safe", I think there are many virtues to a “natural”, unfettered and decentralized way of life far above the mindless homogenization and collectivism of the globalist ideal.

Surviving In The Jungle Requires Strength And Intelligence

A shallow interpretation of the law of the jungle would argue that “only the strong survive.” Collectivists would claim that this is unfair to the weak and ultimately barbaric in principle. I disagree. The assumption these people make is that the “weak” cannot improve their circumstances and therefore require constant babysitting by a central authority. However, if you actually allow people to be challenged rather than coddled, it can be surprising how strong they become.

Globalism destroys the environmental conditions that inspire excellence and instead rewards and protects mediocrity. Take for example the problems regarding “too big to fail” banks; these institutions are really failures in every respect and, like wounded gazelles, should be given a quick death. But under the theory of globalization the strategy has (so far) been to keep these failures limping along. In other words, the incentive for success has been undermined and weakness has been rewarded.

In this way, not just in the business world but also in the social world, globalism encourages people to accomplish as little as possible and comforts them with promises of being forever nurtured by the global nanny state.
If this kind of world becomes an absolute, society will decay and revert to something subhuman. All evolutionary progress will be lost.

Surviving In The Jungle Requires Merit

You have to be useful in the jungle; you have to produce, repair or teach something truly valuable. You have to build. You have to innovate. You have to invent. You have put in the effort to take control of your destiny. You have to prove your merit if you want to thrive. Under globalism, none of this behavior is really necessary or rewarded.

One of the early phases of collectivism, as it establishes its control base, is to forcefully “equalize” all existing elements. This means that collectivist societies often oppress the naturally successful and debase a population until they all meet the same standards of the lowest common denominator.

The small but vocal movement of social justice cultists in the West is a perfect example of the collectivist narrative inherent in globalism. If any movement embodies anti-merit, it is the social justice warriors.

The social justice presumption of life is that all human beings must be treated as if they have merit, and this is often based on their level of victim status rather than their accomplishments. For example, in my article “Why Conscripting Women Into Combat Will Result In Cultural Disaster,” I outlined the outright progressive dismantling of U.S. military training standards in order to open the door for far weaker females to enter active combat units. Superior merit is being systematically removed from the military in order to make way for homogenization based on mediocrity. And while the law of the jungle does not call for a standing military, the fact remains that the loss of merit will invariably lead to a weaker military overall.

I have even seen SJW men argue that they must promote the lowest common denominator under movements like feminism because in a culture based on merit, they personally would have no chance at survival. They claim they are too weak to undertake traditional male roles of production and protection and thus opt for the laziness and safety of the collective rather than bettering themselves. In the jungle, the willfully useless would be quickly eaten, or they would die simply due to their own stupidity and sloth; and I have to say, I’m not so sure that’s a bad thing.

When you give the least successful people the keys to the foundation of your society you discourage the truly successful from pursuing further excellence. The goal for a person who really wants to make their way in such a world would then be to gain as much victim status as possible in order to get the most rewards. Merit becomes superfluous.

Under globalism, this SJW nightmare would achieve world-wide recognition and political promotion.

Survival In The Jungle Requires The Will For Self Defense


The globalist ideal is rooted in pacifism. That is to say aggressive defense by the average individual is treated as either unscrupulous or futile. Why learn how to protect your own life and the lives of others when you can keep your hands clean and have the establishment do it for you? Why not support global governance, end the law of the jungle and put an armed sentry and surveillance camera on every street corner to ward off potential predators? Why not trade all self determination for the promise of endless comfort and a carefree existence?

The problem is, as we have seen in numerous instances in highly self-defense-restricted environments in Europe, the state cannot and will never be able to fulfill its empty promises of constant protection. At bottom, the only promise the authorities can keep is that they will quickly clean up the mess left behind by your corpse after an attack has already occurred. And, as we have seen in other instances in the U.S., the authorities are sometimes also the assailants.

In the jungle, there are no pacifists. They are all dead, or they have converted to a self defense mindset. Pacifists therefore need a collectivist herd to blend into so that they can hide, or so that the guy next to them can be eaten while they make their escape.

Globalism requires the dilution of an actively vigilant population because the philosophy of self defense leads naturally to an appreciation for individual action. Centralized government cannot take control of a citizenry that has the will to strike back on its own against predators.

Anyone who promotes a pacifist response is merely aiding the predators, and this includes people who promote a pacifist response towards predatory governments. If the average person lived by the law of the jungle rather than waiting for a “civilized” authority to protect them or parcel out the freedoms they were born with as if they were privileges, predatory governments would no longer exist.

The Law Of The Jungle Requires Freedom In All Things


You cannot act in the jungle if you are restricted by bureaucracy and collectivist niceties. And if you cannot act freely in the jungle then you will die in the jungle. Therefore, the jungle and the globalist system are mutually exclusive environments.

This does not mean that in the jungle there are no consequences for taking undue actions that harm others. As in the Libertarian concept of the non-aggression principle, it is far better to leave others alone to pursue their own prosperity, first because it is the right thing to do, but also because they may have means of self defense just as you do. To try to control the lives of others, the thoughts of others, the language of others, the personal associations of others, the property rights of others, is to elicit a justified backlash and the loss of your own life.

To be a predator in the jungle is not without ample risk, most animals will defend themselves when cornered and an injured predator could end up a dead predator. But to be a predator in a globalist world populated with unarmed sheep means there is little risk, especially when you are sanctioned by the establishment.

The jungle is a place where meaningful progress serving the individual is essential, for even a jungle tribe is only as strong as the individuals that make up its ranks. The globalist world is a place where meaningful progress is stifled and strong individuals are treated as a threat. Globalism requires a collectivist machine, a hive mind in which the individual is only a piston in the apparatus. Globalism displaces creative thinking in the name of efficiency, and murders innovation.

A globalist society would be a static society, frozen in an endless cycle of conformity and sameness.
The only beneficiaries would be those at the top of the pyramid, who, as in all collectivist ventures, reap the majority of the rewards because they are the people who get to redistribute the wealth of production in any manner they see fit.

In the jungle, these redistributors would be seen as useless middlemen, parasitic gatekeepers standing in the way of production and prosperity, drinking their share of blood from every transaction and every invention; stealing earned wealth from the successful in order to feed another army of people they have encouraged to also become parasites through the ideology of anti-merit.

In the jungle, in a free world, people would immediately question why these middlemen posing as authority figures and financiers should exist at all?
What purpose do they serve? They certainly have no merit. They are not successful because they are better than anyone else at anything necessary. They are not hunter gatherers, they are not producers, they are not defenders, they are not teachers, and they are not fixers. They feed off the rest of us but they are not active and honest competitors. They are not lions or tigers or bears. They are vicious scavengers. Carrion feeders or thieves. They are rabid hyenas and jackals looking to nibble a piece at time from us when while we are distracted.

In the jungle, these vermin are often present but certainly not welcome. At any opportunity they are squashed. In this way it is understandable why globalists would be so afraid of the jungle.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#69)
LAMas
AzB Silver Member
LAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 34,188
vCash: 1700
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
   
07-28-2016, 03:19 AM

Were the indigenous Aborigines content with their lot or did the desire Air Jordan Sneakers etc. require assistance to profit the money lenders?


dumluk
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#70)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 52,834
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
07-28-2016, 05:42 AM

Quote:
The questions are, what did he mean by the “rule of law,” and what did he mean by the “law of the jungle?”
Rule of "law" for those leftist neo-cons means killing children with impunity. Rule by the gun.

Law of the jungle for those leftist neo-cons means liberty. Rule by the people.

What is that farce believed by ball game crowds about what the "heroes" are fighting for? Oh yeah, rule by the gun.


Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#71)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 52,834
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
07-28-2016, 07:06 AM





Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote
One way, or another, the Masters will have their way....
Old
  (#72)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
One way, or another, the Masters will have their way.... - 08-05-2016, 10:17 AM

30,000 Refugees "Go Missing" As Swedes Face Increasing Violence From Asylum-Seekers


The daily Svenska Dagbladet reported that 30,000 people whose asylum application had been rejected and were scheduled for deportation, had gone missing.

The police say they lack the resources to track down these illegals... but do not complain: "If you disagree with the establishment, you are immediately called a racist or fascist, which we definitely are not. At times I felt that this was what it must have been like to live in the old Soviet Union."


Aug 5, 2016 12:05 PM
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#73)
LAMas
AzB Silver Member
LAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond reputeLAMas has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 34,188
vCash: 1700
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
   
08-05-2016, 06:18 PM

If they ruled the word...what's next for their kids?


dumluk
  
Reply With Quote
Diversity DESTROYS Social Cohesion in the West
Old
  (#74)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
Diversity DESTROYS Social Cohesion in the West - 08-07-2016, 08:52 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTROCGb5qj8
  
Reply With Quote
Don't you dare speak against her...it's racist...
Old
  (#75)
jimmyg
Mook! What's a Mook?
jimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond reputejimmyg has a reputation beyond repute
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 32,009
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jun 2006
   
Don't you dare speak against her...it's racist... - 08-07-2016, 06:12 PM

CNN Host Slams America's Greatest Olympian Ever For Not Being Black, Muslim Woman


Michael Phelps may be the greatest Olympian the world has ever known but for CNN host W. Kamau Bell, he is just a "tall, successful, rich white guy" who clearly didn’t "need the honor" of being chosen by his athlete peers as America's flag-bearer.

Instead, Bell exclaims, Ibtihaj Muhammad, a woman, an African-American and a Muslim to boot, should have been chosen because "right now America has enough tall, successful, rich white guys hogging the spotlight trying to make America great."


Aug 7, 2016 8:30 PM
  
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 5 of 13 « First 345 67 Last »

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.