Not a chance.
So... not a “teaching scenario “?
Nor a learning moment either ...... sharing? Evidently not.
Just rock throwing by the self claimed, unconfirmed 700.
Got it
Not a chance.
Ok...now we are getting somewhere. Based on your observations, what are the longest and slowest extremes of tip/ ball contact?
So ALL the major LD shaft makers are full of s^&t and this nimrod nodefl. is right???? Seriously??? When you are proven to be 10000000000000% wrong, its time to stfu and crawl back into your mama's basement.
I would observe how long the tip is on the CB, how long the CB is on the OB, by how wide the path is of the cueball after contact on a center follow shot with a slight angle. If the tip is on the CB a long time then the CB "sticks" on the OB longer. Since the CB is on the OB longer it will widen out significantly and the OB will be turned inward. To widen the angle by staying on the CB long you have to over cut the OB which is opposite of what you would think to widen the angle. The less time on the ball, the less the OB drags and the less you need to over cut the OB, the less the CB will widen on the shot. The extreme long time on the ball seems to widen almost a diamond. The short time on the ball seems to almost push through the ball and won't widen out.
If you perform the notion of staying on the CB an extreme long time a few things will also happen. The CB gains a significant amount of speed quickly and gets to the OB fast, in what feels like an early part of your follow thru, still complete your follow thru, but that is where the hit will be felt if you are on it a long time. You will have to be ready because the CB leaves faster than you are ready for at first. The less time you are on the ball the later the hit feeling will be, and the CB will leave slower than expected when you get to an extreme short time on the ball. The shortest time will feel like it hits the cueball at the end of your follow thru.
Before you edit it again...Lets PAUSE the thread and look at this detail.
A. Clearly there is a range of tip contact time that is very small.
B. If a player hits a ball with a .00293847 second contact time. Will the next shot also be measured at .00293847 and the rest indefinitely?
C. It must be measured every time at .00293847 seconds if time on the ball cannot be altered.
__________
Lets PAUSE the thread and look at this detail.
A. Clearly there is a range of tip contact time that is very small.
B. If a player hits a ball with a .00293847 second contact time. Will the next shot also be measured at .00293847 and the rest indefinitely?
C. It must be measured every time at .00293847 seconds if time on the ball cannot be altered.
Are you sure you don't mean, ''Kenneth, what is the frequency?'':wink:Is that you, Steve?
I was referring to something that predated the R.E.M. song.a tad formal there, bob...what's the frequency, Kenneth?
I was on a cross country drive with a then girlfriend when that song came out. ...
Are you sure you don't mean, ''Kenneth, what is the frequency?'':wink:
Only people of a certain age are likely to get the reference. The rest of you are free to feel left behind while in front.
Steve, Steve, ... Does this refer to someone in Chicago who thought the universe of a particular cue maker? I'm getting an image of a small sheep for some reason....
View attachment 529103
Or maybe it's just an attack of synesthesia. I'm hungry all of a sudden. Where's the mint jelly?
Explain this concept?
Delusional and stubborn. This wingnut is completely off-the-air.Facts = Things that were shown to be correct
Not Facts = words without proof, especially those that counter all other known information
For the 40th time I'm sure in this post, show us a video of how all this is done and how you became a superhuman to be able to adjust your hit on the cueball that is well under any human reaction time. By the time your nerves tell your brain you hit the cueball, the cueball is already moving. Then you need reaction time for your brain to process the information, then send the signals back to your muscles to do something.
What you are probably doing is causing the cuebeall to curve back in line after it deflects with an off center and elevated hit. You are not actually making the shaft have no deflection, you are compensating for that deflection and are just confused about what you are actually doing. I see it all the time, people do something in 10 steps, but the result they want was achieved in step 3, they are just repeating other steps because at some point they did all that and it worked. But their knowledge of the topic was not enough to know the rest of the stuff was useless.
You masse the ball enough so it hits the target and think you invented some new method of cheating physics. That is the only thing you can possibly be doing that can exists in this universe under our physical laws. It is impossible to make a solid object react the way you say you are doing it without a system that can react faster than the interactions between those objects. Period. Video and tests, video and tests. Or this post is nothing but wasted space done by someone that likes to hear themselves talk.
Now if you said "I have a great way to compensate my aiming and shooting for deflection" that is a sane statement. Saying "I can make my cue not deflect the cueball" is something else.