A Public Statement

DTL said:

Grab a chair and sit down along the long rail looking straight down the head string line. But first set a piece of chalk on the 3rd diamond on the opposite side of the table (middle diamond between corner and side pocket). Now set a piece of chalk on each side of the the first piece. Then place the CB on the head string one diamond away from the pieces of chalk.

So while sitting, you should try to be looking right down the head string line with both eyes open, straight through the CB, and hopefully see most or some of the center of the middle piece of chalk. While doing this, aim with your index finger trying your hardest to use both eyes equally……if your doing this right you’ll eventually see two index fingers with the CB and center piece of chalk in the middle of the two fingers (this may be difficult for severely right-eye/left-eye dominant players).

Once you see two fingers and the centers of the CB and center piece of chalk are dead center between them, keep your head very still and alternate between closing one eye then the other. What will happen is when you close the left eye you’ll be looking straight through the cue ball at the left piece of chalk…..and vice versa when closing the right eye. Question: when doing this are you looking through 3 different centers of the CB …..one with both eyes open, one with only left eye open, and one with only right eye open? If yes, you're doing this with the same CB/head position.

Take a shot where the OB is one diamond each down the short and long rails and the CB is one diamond down the short rail and two diamonds down the long rail…….basically a short left cut into the corner pocket, close to 1/2 ball hit (?)…very close to the shot Corey set up in his DVD (the one referenced in a recent thread). If you move both balls toward the end rail one inch at a time the cut with get more severe and eventually you have a near 90 degree cut when the OB gets close to the rail. As this happens the CP to CP changes. For many people when this happens, they’ll use one eye more than the other……maybe mostly the right eye (for right eye dominant player) for the first shot but as the shot gets closer to a 90 degree left cut, the left eye starts taking over to better see the two CPs line up (vice versa for cut to the right). As this happens, same thing is going on in the above situation above with the 3 pieces of chalk. This may be what Gene Albrecht teaches with his Perfect Aim in terms of how the eyes work with cuts to right and left.

Anyway, my point is with same CB/OB relationship and distance , when one eye takes over, you can be seeing different CB centers and perhaps different OB edges, too....even when both eyes are open. And perhaps, probably in most cases, without the player even knowing it.

Click to expand...

HawaiianEye said:

If he posted it to you in a PM, why are your putting his stuff out in public?

LOL.

You remind me of a gossipy old woman.

Is there nothing else besides AZB and aiming that can "contain" your COMPULSION?

I think there are some sorts of medications that maybe could help you.

Ask Chopdoc.

FWIW, I'd NEVER trust you with any information of ANY kind. Loose lips sink ships..

Click to expand...

DTL said:

I just pointed out the one situation.....never directly said anything like you said I said.

I did maybe call you a "nuthu$$er" once or twice about the way you sucked up to certain posters.....sorry about that. That doesn't mean I was insinuating you and that person were sexually involved with each other like you said.....people have used that term a lot on here. And now I think it's forbidden my the mods.

Anyway what did you think about my post? Say the shot example I used, the first 1-3 shots as the balls move closer to the rail may have the same visuals and sweep, but as the cut gets slightly steeper one eye might start to creep in and become more "dominant" which would change what the player is seeing in terms of centers and perhaps edges.....which could be enough to change to angle the OB takes even if they're same relationship/distance.

Click to expand...

Low500 said:

Someone said you were a professed Christian.
Science easily refutes the idea of the virgin birth of a child named Jesus caused directly by God.
Science easily refutes the idea of a man being killed on a cross and then rising from the dead.
Do you, as a scientist, reject those concepts as well....since they are "scientifically known to be false"?
(and don't say anything about "that's not what we're discussing on this site...I saw you going around and around with someone in that NPR forum the other night.) Not "very scientific" of you

Click to expand...

Low500 said:

Not very "scientific of you", little man.
Science can prove that a murderer named Saul in Jewish history didn't get struck blind on the road to Damascus too.
But, as for you, you sure got struck blind 20 years ago when you began your incessant badgering on this aiming forum. And you still are blind.

Click to expand...

DTL said:

Look at post #60.......and what I quoted from one of your post. I wasn't talking about Objective/Subjective.

Your statement --> "However, ANYTIME the distance between the balls is 24", and you use the exact same visuals (ETA and CTE) you will get the exact same ccb perspective".

Now read post #60 again.......and the last paragraph in post #64. Isn't it indeed possible to have the same CB/OB relationship/distance and get a different perspective/outcome while using the exact same visual/sweep?

Click to expand...

DTL said:

What I’m talking about here has nothing to do with CTE. Just pointing out what happens
with some players on right and left cut shots when the eyes can change (without the player knowing it) in terms of dominance. Joe Tucker talks about this and invented the 3rd Eye Trainer to combat it.

Click to expand...

DTL said:

That the below quote is a false statement.

"However, ANYTIME the distance between the balls is 24", and you use the exact same visuals (ETA and CTE) you will get the exact same ccb perspective".

Click to expand...