Do we really need perfect racks in 9 Ball?
Why do the racks have to be perfect? Reading imperfect racks is a skill that's very much a part of the game.
Yes, I know how it started --- back when players started taking 15 minutes to rack the balls. But years before players started getting nit-picky, they would quickly read the rack, analyze it and then break accordingly. And guess what? The best players still won.
So where are they now with these perfect racks? They now rack with the 9 ball on the spot instead of the 1 ball, otherwise a wing ball would fly into the pocket every time. This changes the game completely.
That's like playing 14.1 and racking the balls with the center ball on the spot instead of the head ball. It's not the same game.
I'd like to see a 9-Ball tournament played the way the game was meant to be played --- with imperfect racks where the breaker actually has to do some work in analyzing the rack and the one ball is racked on the spot. I bet the best players will still win just like before.
Let the opponent rack. Just put a time limit on racking. The breaker can ask for reracks within the time limit. If the breaker is still unsatisfied by the end of the racking time limit, then the breaker can have the ref rack the balls. But he has to accept the ref's rack. All this can be done within 2 minutes or less.
Why do the racks have to be perfect? Reading imperfect racks is a skill that's very much a part of the game.
Yes, I know how it started --- back when players started taking 15 minutes to rack the balls. But years before players started getting nit-picky, they would quickly read the rack, analyze it and then break accordingly. And guess what? The best players still won.
So where are they now with these perfect racks? They now rack with the 9 ball on the spot instead of the 1 ball, otherwise a wing ball would fly into the pocket every time. This changes the game completely.
That's like playing 14.1 and racking the balls with the center ball on the spot instead of the head ball. It's not the same game.
I'd like to see a 9-Ball tournament played the way the game was meant to be played --- with imperfect racks where the breaker actually has to do some work in analyzing the rack and the one ball is racked on the spot. I bet the best players will still win just like before.
Let the opponent rack. Just put a time limit on racking. The breaker can ask for reracks within the time limit. If the breaker is still unsatisfied by the end of the racking time limit, then the breaker can have the ref rack the balls. But he has to accept the ref's rack. All this can be done within 2 minutes or less.