The sad thing is you seem to be proud of that.
Fool yourself if you want, but don't expect the rest of us to be in denial.
CTE Does NOT Work - It Did For One Pro
- Thread starter SpiderWebComm
- Start date
The sad thing is you seem to be proud of that.
Fool yourself if you want, but don't expect the rest of us to be in denial.
The term "visual intelligence" goes with the system. It's not developed from past experience while playing with other methods.
Figures you'd focus on the one shot Gerry missed. He gave a reason, not sure what it was right now but it wasn't related to the system. No one is perfect and does everything right all the time.
Gerry knows the system very well. He knows all the perceptions but he is human and obviously made one mistake. The other 5 he made are very telling. Same visuals from different locations and angles to make the balls.
Can you make those shots using strict CTE?
If you can't see that the actual systems users disagree and the keyboard detectives are the only ones on your side.then you just might be the fool on the hill.
You never did bother with your critique of Gerry's video, perhaps that in itself is very telling. And remember, you asked him to re shoot a shot just for you, which he did.
this is my opinion ... you subconsiusly know where the pocket is, its engraved on your brain, you cant do nothing about it and you need that to help the system work pretty much
Seems like Scarlet disagrees with you.
Welcome to the dark side! If Stan were still here he'd be ripping you a new one by now. I've seen it happen. If other CTE users like cookie and Spider and Low had the common sense you are displaying there would be no 20 year war.
The silence (except for Scarlet) is deafening. I wonder if cookie will answer the question (not really wondering, I know the answer to that already).
i dunno, i was sent a copy of stans 2nd cd as a gift by stan when it came out, i'm just trying help move you guys along, you all seem stuck in here ...
i dished out good info on pro1 a decade ago, people just couldn't understand it and some were here just to troll the system, stan, users lol
Last edited:
It may be time to repost that if you still have it. If Stan knew what you were saying here today he would not be happy... guaranteed. He's the one who is stuck. For him it has to be 100% objective on every shot, forget the pockets, forget player input other than executing the correct perception or else you can go pound sand.
anything i post is strickly my opinion on here, im just saying
there are things i seen differently than stan when it came to pro1, which was ok with me and didn't affect anything...if i thought my subconscious was involved in a shot and he didn't, i was ok with us having a different opinion… stans is the creator and teacher and he is trying figure out a way to help everyone learn it his way from a disk or video and you can do or say what you want after you learn it
if i thought a guy was being a real ass which a lot of guys were/are, i would purposely run them around in circles with info... so try and be nice and you will get good info from people
And lots of people disagree with you
You never did bother with your critique of Gerry's video, perhaps that in itself is very telling. And remember, you asked him to re shoot a shot just for you, which he did.
Silence is deafening,lmao. Or some people have a life.
Why don't you answer anything?
I don't disagree with Scarlett's opinion. Why are you trying to start shit.
Apparently you know the system better then me, here is your chance to prove it. What are the lineups?
I agree...you're subconsiusly making adjustments to where the pocket is.
Could you practice the pro1 visuals using a cb and ob on a surface with know pockets?
lol...Its not like a test they should be worried about. I feel they're talking behind are back.
