Black-Balled said:
How about...
That is way too much change. I would'nt go 1/2 that far and would advise you to first goto hi 12mm, then another cut (or even 2) months later.
Thinking (zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz)...you were threatened with snooker recently. Is that your impetus here?
Actually, I failed to follow up on the threatened snooker outing. Thanks for the reminder, I'll try to make that happen.
But for the cue, I think you misunderstand my intentions. I have a Joss plain-jane cue, and a predator 314 shaft for it. For the past 4 years, I have exclusively shot with the 314. I haven't used the original shaft on the cue except to experiment with it now and then since the first two months I had the cue.
When I do use the original shaft, the tip seems so large that I feel like I'm shooting with a broom handle, and the difference in squirt between the Joss and predator shafts is night and day.
Lately, however, I've been a little dissatisfied with the low-deflection shaft, because when I'm using follow and english, the swerve on the shot more than counteracts the squirt; when using high right english, I actually have to compensate my aim to the left a little, and it always proves very difficult to judge.
But last night I couldn't play with the predator because the 3-year-old talisman pro tip finally popped off it, and so I played for several hours with a one-piece house cue with about a 12.5mm tip diameter, and I was playing really well (for me) with it, using back-hand english (aim and pivot).
So that made me want to try turning down the Joss shaft to a diameter I'm comfortable with, and actually playing with it instead of letting it slowly fossilize in my case.
So does anyone know, quantitatively, how much the squirt would change?
-Andrew