DaWizard
Active member
What does the bolded part mean? Im not familiar with the concept calcutta.Alex wins!! 5-1
Tony is out.
Tony sold for $31,000 in the Calcutta![]()
What does the bolded part mean? Im not familiar with the concept calcutta.Alex wins!! 5-1
Tony is out.
Tony sold for $31,000 in the Calcutta![]()
I never heard of a pro buying himself for more than a couple hundred. Fedor must not know the ropes! ha ha haHelps soften the sting of spending $20,000 on himself in the auction.
In 2011, I bought Dennis Hatch at the US Open for a few hundred, he split it with me even. Yea I realize that's not 40k but if you want to win half back, pretty sure you better pay half in. The ropes you speak of must not be very long... lolI never heard of a pro buying himself for more than a couple hundred. Fedor must not know the ropes! ha ha ha
Thanks, oh yeah I can see that getting interesting and adding a layer of excitement.
What do you mean by "Fedor must not know the ropes"?I never heard of a pro buying himself for more than a couple hundred. Fedor must not know the ropes! ha ha ha
Gambling ropes. The #1 advantage of being a TOP player, even on a local level, is you always have backers. For a top pro to put up 20K USD (if that story is legit) on themselves is extremely surprising. Why take such a risk out of your own pocket. It doesn't make sense, IMO.What do you mean by "Fedor must not know the ropes"?
Believe he had won 35G before the Calcutta. Maybe that was all his money maybe not. Anyways the 20G in the Calcutta would have given him 2 to 1 on the money and perhaps he thought that was good enough to try. Perhaps he expected even better odds?Gambling ropes. The #1 advantage of being a TOP player, even on a local level, is you always have backers. For a top pro to put up 20K USD (if that story is legit) on themselves is extremely surprising. Why take such a risk out of your own pocket. It doesn't make sense, IMO.
I guess its surprising because top players are usually broke, but Fedor is not a top player. He is a world champion and probably has accumulated a healthy bankroll over the past few years.Gambling ropes. The #1 advantage of being a TOP player, even on a local level, is you always have backers. For a top pro to put up 20K USD (if that story is legit) on themselves is extremely surprising. Why take such a risk out of your own pocket. It doesn't make sense, IMO.
Where do you get 2 to 1 on the money from?Believe he had won 35G before the Calcutta. Maybe that was all his money maybe not. Anyways the 20G in the Calcutta would have given him 2 to 1 on the money and perhaps he thought that was good enough to try. Perhaps he expected even better odds?
1st place Calcutta was 120,000. Half is 60,000. His 20gG back and 40 more.Where do you get 2 to 1 on the money from?