You don't even listen to yourself do you? First, you were NOT respectful, you were dismissive. No one said CTE is magic other than YOU and your fellow critics.That would be incorrect. Here's a very respectful video I made 5 years ago that you commented on liberally. The point of the video, in a nutshell, is that hiding the pockets does not prove that CTE is doing some amazing thing that cannot be done any other way.
Secondly you said if you have been playing long enough you just know where the balls need to go. This is incorrect in the way that you meant it but correct in the sense that the pockets are fixed positions. You assume that there is a "long enough" that would reach the proficiency level to pocket balls blindly and I guess that you think you have reached that level because you pocketed two shots.
However, and thirdly, you don't see the significance of what you said when you said in reference to the second shot that you had spent 10-15 minutes figuring them out and that because the object ball is on a hole reinforcer that you determined that the aim point is "just off to the side of the one ball and if the left edge of my shaft is pointing to the edge of the one ball that's about the right spot". You literally discovered AND USED objective reference points based on ONE cueball-object ball set up to get lined up properly for that shot. Of course no one knows, other than 10-15 minutes you said you spent learning the two shots, how many times it took you to make both shots on video while delivering your spiel. But what we do know is that you identified and used objective aiming to make the second shot.
Now you want to tell me that this is the equivalent demonstration to Stan's proof of concept demonstrations? Come on Dan, you can't seriously believe this. I will give you 2:1 on the money if you want to go to Stan's house and do curtain shots against him. In the meantime when you duplicate these videos WITHOUT using objective aiming I will concede that you proved your point. Until now you've only been disingenuous about it. Your "respectful" video was a thinly disguised way of slandering Stan by implying that he did something that anyone can easily do with not much effort.
for this one I am confident in saying that you have NO CHANCE.