Well- what do you plan to do with the list? I don't think just publishing a list makes any sense at all. people would need to know something about each cue maker in terms of: do they honor commitments, do they ask for money up front, what do very experienced cue collectors and players think of the cue maker's cue building skills, are the cue maker's prices matching up to their known quality of work ( as evidenced by very experienced and knowledgeable cue aficionados), how have the cue makers cues held up on the secondary market, etc. etc.
I know some great cue makers out there today and I know of some that are being way over- hyped by a few "dealers" who are just looking to make a quick buck and stick the cue buying public with something that will probably lose half it's value the day you receive it.
I am not lending any information until I know the full disclosure as to how this list would be presented to the public and I think that is fair- I don't want anyone to get stuck with a sub- par cue, a worthless cue, or worse no cue and money out of their pocket.
If you plan to just publish a current cue makers list- then a full disclosure of everything that I mentioned, and more - concerning what a person should be vetting about a maker prior to handing over their money must accompany the list. I just don't want to see anyone get burnt bc they are assuming that a list has been vetted correctly if that is not the case.
What detailed research will you do on each cue makers reputation prior to publishing such a list?