Exactly what I was thinking.In this analogy the potential buyer would be the BCA wouldn't it? ...and not some guy who used to own a different pool hall 8 blocks away who hates the owner of the hall for sale.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Exactly what I was thinking.In this analogy the potential buyer would be the BCA wouldn't it? ...and not some guy who used to own a different pool hall 8 blocks away who hates the owner of the hall for sale.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I said I wouldnt bother you Danny anymore on the topic of JS high run (or JS highlight reel how you like to put it) but this is basically non-related topic you brought up so hopefully my question will be taken as a genuine curiosity on my side and not some kind of trolling - when you said that Lou is a professional pocket billiards player you got me thinking. I have seen Lou shooting pool on two occasions (both youtube vids) - 1pck match against JB in 2015 and a qualifier for 2011 World 14-1 (whatever the name was back then). And while Lou's fundamentals look ok he definitely seemed to lack a reasonable level of consistency both in execution and conceptualisation expected from a pro level in those vids. If I had to guess I would rank Lou around 550-600 in Fargorate at best which in all honesty is not a pro level by quite a lot. So what exactly do you mean by "a professional pocket billiards player"? Is it in your eyes someone who is able to win a bet (does it have to be a higher amount bet maybe..?) against his opponent no matter how good or bad his opponent is? Or is it even possible in USA to turn full time pool pro with that level of game and sustain a reasonable life standard with gambling/tournament winnings? Pls dont get me wrong, I am really curious about this and I would like to hear your opinion. Thank you (I wont use a smiley emoticon as you apparently dont like those...)
I see that you are a new member.
Perhaps a new member that has been lurking for a while? In either case I'm going to guess you don't know the 20+ year history behind what is going on here.
So let me tell you this: there will be no kissing, no hugging, no Christmas cards exchanged. We actually do loathe each other. Neither of us would piss on the other if we saw them on fire.
Lou Figueroa
truth
I have seen Lou compete in One Pocket and 14.1 - he can play - and is a gentleman to compete against - Champion caliber - Yes. I know nothin bout fargo ratings - except that Tony Fargo CAN Bank. I answered yer question - so would u be kind enough to answer the same question I posed to cuedup who has so far - chosen to decline any effort to answer (did not surprise me). SO here it is - Would you believe' or invest' in a business that was lookin to sell - but would NOT show you the revenue books - upon request? IMHO - to believe in something or someone - is a form of an investment - is it not? The bca/csi/nytimes - say's there is a new record of 626 in 14.1 - caught in it;s entirety - on camera - should all God's people just trust what bca is selling - without first seeing their books i.e. unedited video? These are pertinent question - very relevant to the topic at hand. I am interested in purchasing the 626 story as verbatim - am I wrong to ask the bca 4 a gander at their numbers before - actually believing or buying what bca/nytimes is offering foe sale to us honest tax paying citizens? Also what does marek stand for - just another enquiring mind here - located in the middle of Map.I said I wouldnt bother you Danny anymore on the topic of JS high run (or JS highlight reel how you like to put it) but this is basically non-related topic you brought up so hopefully my question will be taken as a genuine curiosity on my side and not some kind of trolling - when you said that Lou is a professional pocket billiards player you got me thinking. I have seen Lou shooting pool on two occasions (both youtube vids) - 1pck match against JB in 2015 and a qualifier for 2011 World 14-1 (whatever the name was back then). And while Lou's fundamentals look ok he definitely seemed to lack a reasonable level of consistency both in execution and conceptualisation expected from a pro level in those vids. If I had to guess I would rank Lou around 550-600 in Fargorate at best which in all honesty is not a pro level by quite a lot. So what exactly do you mean by "a professional pocket billiards player"? Is it in your eyes someone who is able to win a bet (does it have to be a higher amount bet maybe..?) against his opponent no matter how good or bad his opponent is? Or is it even possible in USA to turn full time pool pro with that level of game and sustain a reasonable life standard with gambling/tournament winnings? Pls dont get me wrong, I am really curious about this and I would like to hear your opinion. Thank you (I wont use a smiley emoticon as you apparently dont like those...)
We are not "investing in a business". We are simply believing those who have seen the numbers. Not a big deal. And Lou does not play "champion caliber" pool. You're being silly.I have seen Lou compete in One Pocket and 14.1 - he can play - and is a gentleman to compete against - Champion caliber - Yes. I will ask u the same question that cuedup refuses to answer. Would you believe' or invest' in a business that was lookin to sell - but would not show you the revenue books? IMHO - to believe in something or someone - is a form of an investment - is it not? The bca say's there is a new record of 626 in 14.1 - should all God's people just trust what bca is selling without first seeing their books i.e. unedited video. This is a pertinent question - very relevant to the topic at hand. I am interested in purchasing the 626 story as verbatim - am I wrong to take a gander at the numbers before - actually believing what bca is offering foe sale?
The analogy is crap because his belief adds no value to the matter, unlike the purchaser of the business...who has money.We are not "investing in a business". We are simply believing those who have seen the numbers. Not a big deal. And Lou does not play "champion caliber" pool. You're being silly.
That is not an acceptable answer, I am asking yer opinion - so I ask another way - so as not so easy 4 u to sidestep the actual question. If you were thinking about purchasing a business - of yer choice and thought you saw a good deal - would you invest in that particular business - without first seeing the actual revenue numbers that - business was claiming they produced? Or would u want to see the numbers - first hand for yourself? Please give the non politician answer this time. I real eyes' I am not be in the 'casual viewer' dept I think I'm in the Hawk viewer dept. The Open public would like to purchase the unedited (non chopped evidence) of the 626 product bca is tryin to sell - very tough to buy a product that does not exist - or believe in for that matter? Oh I noticed u threw vaccines in there - evil Very evil cuedpie.BCA , along with many others from product manufacturers to casual viewers, looked at the books saw the evidence and bought the product.
Like many other legitimate products, from vaccines to GMO products, youll always have a group on the outside screaming fraud.
The record, like your unnecessary business example, is a product. The BCA, along with a continually growing body of others, are buying the product as you stand on the sidelines crying fraud.That is not a good answer, I ask another way - so as not so easy 4 u to sidestep the actual question. If you were thinking about purchasing a business - of yer choice and thought you saw a good deal - would you invest in that particular business - without first seeing the actual revenue numbers that - business was claiming they produced. or would u want to see the numbers - first hand for yourself? Please give the non politician answer this time.
That is not a good answer, I ask another way - so as not so easy 4 u to sidestep the actual question. If you were thinking about purchasing a business - of yer choice and thought you saw a good deal - would you invest in that particular business - without first seeing the actual revenue numbers that - business was claiming they produced. or would u want to see the numbers - first hand for yourself? Please give the non politician answer this time.
So u refuse to answer if u would buy stock in a company that refused to show it's numbers. Of course u would not, u just cannot say it cause it's not politically correct for u to do so. As for the bca/csi they already tried to sell me on there product (TAR) that john schmitt was superior to me in 14.1 - they celebrated a bit too early - it did not go well for j.s. and the bca/csi teem of collaborator's. Similar to the 626 product they are trying to sell now - the only difference is - TAR video between shmit and myself - IS for sale in unedited form. The bca's unedited proof of their 626 claim - NOT FOR SALE in unedited form - behind closed doors. Not crying here at all, just interested in keeping yer cancel culture away from Mosconi's Official Legit World Record of 526.The record, like your unnecessary business example, is a product. The BCA, along with a continually growing body of others, are buying the product as you stand on the sidelines crying fraud.
Lol@you.
We are not "investing in a business". We are simply believing those who have seen the numbers. Not a big deal. And Lou does not play "champion caliber" pool. You're being silly.
Bernie had two things going on. One, a ponzi scheme. That's easy to figure out. But it was also an affinity scheme. He scammed a lot of Jewish people. They said, He's one of us... Yep.People run scams all the time, often with great risk — I think Bernie Madoff did it for a number of years to the tune of 60+ billion dollars.
So the: why would he risk.... doesn’t carry much weight with me, particularly when it is involving pool players.
Lou Figueroa
just sayin’
Exactly. Danny and his tribe are alleging that Schmidt, the room owner, the people who attended the run, the BCA, Predator, and maybe Bob Jewett, Mark Wilson, Nick Varner, and others who have reviewed the run., are all in on it.Well in the end it is you and few others here saying JS's run was a scam...without any proof (even IF you were right) it is simply a defamation. Good luck with that approachJS provided his proof (unedited vid of the run) to the only authority in USA that could proclaim JS's run a new record which it did. Btw i am not sure you noticed that there were several (10+) people who were present during the whole record run..? Because saying the run was a fraud means that you are saying those people were lying as well. General disregard for the law here on this forum has always amazed me but this thread is really a cherry on the top. I can see now that trying to return back here was silly on my part, nothing good comes from here anymore...
![]()
That's the biggest flaw with most conspiracy theories...the sheer number of people required who all have to magically be perfectly synchronized, completely discrete even to spouses and during moments of weakness and drunkenness, and supremely motivated. It's simply not feasible even if we were to believe it was their intent.Exactly. Danny and his tribe are alleging that Schmidt, the room owner, the people who attended the run, the BCA, Predator, and maybe Bob Jewett, Mark Wilson, Nick Varner, and others who have reviewed the run., are all in on it.
The run is accepted by all the people who matter.
Danny, Lou, and Danny's Bowel Movement are just talking. They haven't done anything. They haven't contacted the BCA or John Schmidt or Predator or any of the people who have a role They're just making allegations without any evidence. Some of the allegations are delusional. For some reason, they seem to feel that they should be consulted or that they're entitled to a role here, simply because they're fans of Willie Mosconi. I guess their feelings are hurt.
I think Willie would be embarrassed.
If they simply felt that they'd "believe it when they see it", that's fair. But to allege all kinds of nefarious motives to the people who were involved in setting a new high-run record is kind of sad.
At least Danny (finally) gets some attention this way...If they simply felt that they'd "believe it when they see it", that's fair. But to allege all kinds of nefarious motives to the people who were involved in setting a new high-run record is kind of sad.
Bernie had two things going on. One, a ponzi scheme. That's easy to figure out. But it was also an affinity scheme. He scammed a lot of Jewish people. They said, He's one of us... Yep.
On this thread, it's like a car crash in slow motion. It's gross, but you can't stop watching.