Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit

Status
Not open for further replies.

gerryf

Well-known member
xradarx said:
You write a good game but don’t own the cajones to match, dreaming while woke.
I play the games that you can only wish you could.
I speak for myself, Rādär, and not anyone else.
You may be the schizophrenic with multiple identities writing around blaming others for your ineptitude’s.
Heh, Heh, Heh…Rādär
Ha! Ha!

Danny, your ramblings are entertaining!! Yup, talk is cheap!
 

Ghosst

Broom Handle Mafia
Silver Member
Sorry, very hard to understand what your saying. I'm in Ontario, Canada. We've been in lockdown for a better part of a year+

Dude, that shit's crystal clear compared to the rest of his ramblings.


Also, am I the only one who got blocked by both of Harriman's accounts? You guys gotta step it up if you wanna hang.
 

Ghosst

Broom Handle Mafia
Silver Member
No you are too old evidently to do even simple math, a possible attempt at propping up the bca's chopped video - positive reaffirmations i.e. 'measurement interference' is just yer forum' of 'entanglement'. One common tator haha - was that common tator fried, steamed, or baked? Maybe all three? It would be fine to figure an average of balls pocketed per min - if there was unedited footage to truly do the math. I give yer math skills a negative reaffirmation - I sure know, I can figure multiples of 14 faster than greased lightening.

Quantum Physics? Ok, now you have my attention.

(Or I'm just hoping to break page 200 for shiggles.)

Either way, what the meth? Am I right, or am I right?

xDannyx where art thou?
 

Fatboy

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
OT but kinda related to this

For years I was accused of being a crook, when in fact I wasn’t a crook. It never bothered me as I knew I was playing it square-contrary to public opinion (here on AZN for those who remember). But in my heart I knew I was playing it square. And the proof is in the pudding. I closed the biz in May 08 because it wasn’t making it anymore, the internet and market factors rendered it obsolete. I paid my taxes, played by the rules and went on with my life.

Here is the part that bothers me. I was a crook and scammer from 93-96. I did some very very bad things to people using a telephone-I was the greatest telemarketer ever. I got all the money. To this day that bothers me. It’s less than 1% of what I’ve made in my life. But it was wrong and bad. It eats you from the inside of you have a conscience.

I’m glad it’s behind me-one chapter in my life I’m not proud of and regret doing. I do what I can to make up for the damage I caused. But I have to live with it. Living a lie isn’t something I can do.

best

Fatboy
 

Dan Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
Yes, I think his claim is legit. I haven't seen the video, but have good friends that did. I know you guys have a long standing beef, but again... I think John has a legit claim to the record. It has been viewed, and confirmed, has it not? Tell me, what am I missing here?
yer missing common sense, fact based data is not related to here say evidence.
 

Dan Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
Apparently you missed me...and that's cool, I guess.

I know that I'm going to regret this, but why not, you'll end up quoting something old from me regardless.

"Chopped", to me, would mean edited. Meaning the video was not continuous.

As I understand it, and I haven't been to one of the viewings (like you), the video is still running continuous, just sped up for a portion of the run. Being sped up does not equal being edited. Now, if you were to say that its more difficult to see any potential fouls due to the speed, at least that is a valid argument. I'm not certain that it would make a difference, but again, neither you nor I have seen that sped-up video. It apparently doesn't bother those who are knowledgeable and have actually watched it.

But you are only continuing to make yourself look bad by claiming that the video is "chopped". Not that you care.

I guess I can look forward to this being quoted in the next day or two, as well as 3 or 4 months from now...
Actually anyone who accepts here say evidence as Extraordinary Evidence - is the one who looks bad. Speeding up footage constitutes chopped in my book. Searching for the truth is a good thing.
 

gerryf

Well-known member
Hooray!

Danny did it! A high-run of 200 pages! And most of it due to his own conspiracy theories! We could have been there sooner if Danny didn't keep deleting his posts, but he came through in the end.

That's performance! Good work Danny!

The next step should be aimed more at expressing coherent thoughts instead of confused ramblings, but hey, we know what you're going through and understand the stress you're under.
 

Dan Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
You're correct. It is true that I wasn't there, but hearsay? so, you were there? And that's how you're able to confirm it didn't happen?
I never stated u were not there - U stated that yer good freiends (facebook?) believed the claim and then so did u. Do u not consider yer friend's opinion to be here say evidence? If yer freiends told u it was safe to jump off the a 100 ft cliff - would u? Not to woory' palmetto gear - Mosconi's Real World record Stands tall in the Smithsonian Institute. The only way to drain their 626 swamp of any foul play is to offer the run in it's entirety for sale to Open public, then the here say she said he said would be no longer, after two years they have not released any unedited footage ha ha. How does it feel to believe in something that is more than likely a cheap publicity stunt? if u accept the bca/j.s./c.w experimental evidence as fact based data - yer iq has to be below 70.
 
Last edited:

Black-Balled

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I never stated u were not there - U stated that yer good freiends (facebook?) saw the doctored' video. Do u not consider yer friend's opinion to be here say evidence? If yer freiends told u it was safe to jump off the a 100 ft cliff - would u? Not to woory' palmetto gear - Mosconi's Real World record Stands tall in the Smithsonian Institute. The only way to drain their 626 swamp of any foul play is to offer the run in it's entirety for sale to Open public, then the here say she said he said would be no longer, after two years they have not released any unedited footage ha ha. How does it feel to believe in something that is more than likely a cheap publicity stunt? if u accept the bca/j.s./c.w experimental evidence as fact based data - yer iq has to be below 70.
Screenshot_20210628-124223.jpg
 

Dan Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
Honestly, I recommend not arguing with Danny or non-believers.

Looking at it objectively, he's going to believe what he believes, and it should be fairly clear by now that nobody's going to change his mind.

But is that such a bad thing? Sure, it might grate slightly, but in the grand scheme of things, some guy on the internet doesn't believe it's real. Okay.

Mosconi's record was a really nice one, and it was amazing that it stood for so long, so there's an element of sadness in seeing it go. The human mind doesn't like change, and will try to believe what it wants to believe. We have to work to overcome this, and everyone fails to be perfectly rational sometimes.
Do u think the Smithsonian will recognize the bca/c.w/j.s Claim as a legit record - as they do Mosconi's? Are u saying I am a non believer ha ha - what a joke u are. Yer wrong on many counts - 1st any person who is holding the unedited 626 tape can easily change my mind -after i see more than the experimental evidence the bca has produced. If the bca had an unedited tape of the 626 - they would have offered it to Open Public and or we would have seen it by now. The human mind (as u put it) does like fact based data when determining if there has been foul play in a long standing World Record - if ur hear to defend the bca/c.w./j.s chopped video u will need to do better 'keybored wearier'. How does it feel to believe in something that is nothing more than a cheap publicity stunt. So again - u r wrong - the bca/j.s/c.w teem of corruption can change my mind - unedited footage - that I and many other 14.1 students can see with our own eyes - would suffice.
 
Last edited:

Dan Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
JS had to take at least one or two bathroom breaks. And who knows how much time passed between racks.

You are 100% justified in arguing for evidence.

Thanks again for being Real. Too many facebook programs defending the bca's theater show/chopped video, if they are hear to defend a chopped video as 'Sufficient Evidence' they will be laughed at - as they should be.
 

Dan Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
Apparently you missed me...and that's cool, I guess.

I know that I'm going to regret this, but why not, you'll end up quoting something old from me regardless.

"Chopped", to me, would mean edited. Meaning the video was not continuous.

As I understand it, and I haven't been to one of the viewings (like you), the video is still running continuous, just sped up for a portion of the run. Being sped up does not equal being edited. Now, if you were to say that its more difficult to see any potential fouls due to the speed, at least that is a valid argument. I'm not certain that it would make a difference, but again, neither you nor I have seen that sped-up video. It apparently doesn't bother those who are knowledgeable and have actually watched it.

But you are only continuing to make yourself look bad by claiming that the video is "chopped". Not that you care.

I guess I can look forward to this being quoted in the next day or two, as well as 3 or 4 months from now...
Yea if three or four months - is a long time (in year book i guess it is) u must be getting purty old - I would say that is a good thing. This forum and Straight Pool needs honesty. I really don't think u are honest.
 

Dan Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
OT but kinda related to this

For years I was accused of being a crook, when in fact I wasn’t a crook. It never bothered me as I knew I was playing it square-contrary to public opinion (here on AZN for those who remember). But in my heart I knew I was playing it square. And the proof is in the pudding. I closed the biz in May 08 because it wasn’t making it anymore, the internet and market factors rendered it obsolete. I paid my taxes, played by the rules and went on with my life.

Here is the part that bothers me. I was a crook and scammer from 93-96. I did some very very bad things to people using a telephone-I was the greatest telemarketer ever. I got all the money. To this day that bothers me. It’s less than 1% of what I’ve made in my life. But it was wrong and bad. It eats you from the inside of you have a conscience.

I’m glad it’s behind me-one chapter in my life I’m not proud of and regret doing. I do what I can to make up for the damage I caused. But I have to live with it. Living a lie isn’t something I can do.

best

Fatboy
Thanks for that testimony Fatboy (I have one as well). I noticed Charlie Williams and John at the Last dragon 14.1 (world event) right before the pandemic - they were hanging close - and looked as if they were up to something. They are business pardners' - I could see they were about to make some sort of play. I guess poor charlie figured he had worked at promoting 14.1 (bringing it back into mainstream media) through his non sanctioned tournament in nyc and was scouting for a player to take Mosconi's place. It is a bit sobering to see charlie, john, and bca try to steal a Long standing American Sports History Record - and not offer any solid evidence to support their Claim. They should not have Claimed to have caught the run on camera - and then not offer an unedited version to the Public for sale - for any aspiring 14.1 student of the game to view the raw footage in disc form - very shameful for them. I am glad u have a conscience Fatboy were all human, my take is honesty is not the easiest route - John tried to surpass Mosconi's 526 during his livestreamed attempts - but failed - he was broke and the only way to get the hall of fame/ new pred cue deal was to possibly tell a bold face lie to the Public i.e take the $ and run to a phony chopped video theater show. I do not think j.s or c.w are honest - in relation to their recent business Dealings/Claims - I would rather be broke than go down the path he, charlie, and bca have.
 
Last edited:

gerryf

Well-known member
Thanks for that testimony Fatboy (I have on as well). I noticed Charlie Williams and John at the Last dragon 14.1 (world event) right before the pandemic - they were hanging close - and looked as if they were up to something. They are business pardners' - I could see they were about to make some sort of play. I guess poor charlie figured he had worked at promoting 14.1 (bringing it back into mainstream media) through his non sanctioned tournament in nyc and was scouting for a player to take Mosconi's place. It is a bit sobering to see charlie, john, and bca try to steal a Long standing American Sports History Record - and not offer any solid evidence to support their Claim. They should not have Claimed to have caught the run on camera - and then not offer an unedited version to the Public for sale - for any aspiring 14.1 student of the game to view the raw footage in disc form - very shameful for them. I am glad u have a conscience Fatboy were all human, my take is honesty is not the easiest route - John tried to surpass Mosconi's 526 during his livestreamed attempts - but failed - he was broke and the only way to get the hall of fame/ new pred cue deal was to possibly tell a bold face lie to the Public i.e take the $ and run to a phony chopped video theater show. I do not think j.s or c.w are honest - in relation to their recent business Dealings/Claims - I would rather be broke than go down the path he, charlie, and bca have.
Danny, i thought i understood where you were coming from. I didn't think it had anything to do with worshipping Willie Mosconi.

You don't like John Schmidt and there was no way you'd let anyone believe he had accomplished anything. You also don't like anyone who likes John Schmidt, or anyone who respects his accomplishments.

Is it all just because John Schmidt is now destined for the Billiards Hall of Fame, and you're not, unless you can accomplish something?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top