Why aren you...uhhh, I mean, Charles Harriman... giving that 351 vid out for free?who dat?
Why aren you...uhhh, I mean, Charles Harriman... giving that 351 vid out for free?who dat?
That's what it costs to attend the Evening with John Schmidt !
A cool memory probably. That whole road show sounded like a good time with other folks who also enjoy pool. And if there was a table to shoot around on that would even be better. But it’s about time a video of this damn run was for sale already.What do the people who went to "the show" have?
Lou Figueroa
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.Here’s a free tip wally ol’man just for U, take a deep breath of it.
Everything else, U pay, same as the rest.
The freeshow train left the station long ago and it can’t be stopped and is protected from hitchhikers.
Send your $40 cash/check/money order to D, ah hell, you know where to send it. You can’t be dumb as the, can you? rd
That's true, but the people who have gone to John Schmidt's evening have all described it as well worth seeing and that must be due to the way the information was presented.OK.
But I still have the DVD to watch again anytime I want. I can put it on slow-mo, or speed it up. I can study it and learn patterns.
What do the people who went to "the show" have?
Lou Figueroa
What does anyone who attended one of Mosconi's exhibitions have?OK.
But I still have the DVD to watch again anytime I want. I can put it on slow-mo, or speed it up. I can study it and learn patterns.
What do the people who went to "the show" have?
Lou Figueroa
Everybody who gotta to watch Willie Mosconi play got to see a viewing experience with the Greatest straight pool player of all time.What does anyone who attended one of Mosconi's exhibitions have?
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk
We would do it the same way that we have for the hundreds or thousands of years we did before we had video. If you doubt the veracity of a claim, you ask the people who were there or have witnessed it. If you still doubt it, you're welcome to call into question the competency or the trustworthiness of those making the claim; however, when you do, it's important to back that claim up with evidence.sue CITY sue!
pull ur nickers up kocha-borough.
hard to discuss bs with the invisible, unknown, rd, no?
Your failure to refute or even acknowledge the hypocrisy of charging for one vid and crying about not being to obtain another shows how prejudiced and ignorant you are.sue CITY sue!
pull ur nickers up kocha-borough.
hard to discuss bs with the invisible, unknown, rd, no?
John threw (maybe) chalk at him once too. Don't forget that.We would do it the same way that we have for the hundreds or thousands of years we did before we had video. If you doubt the veracity of a claim, you ask the people who were there or have witnessed it. If you still doubt it, you're welcome to call into question the competency or the trustworthiness of those making the claim; however, when you do, it's important to back that claim up with evidence.
We have had multiple trustworthy individuals claim to have seen the unedited video AND to have witnessed it first hand and you and your ilk have given ZERO counter evidence except that you don't like the fact that John broke the record.
Jaden
Where’s the video for that one?John threw (maybe) chalk at him once too. Don't forget that.
Where are you buying your turkeys? Yikes.You are as full of sh*t as any thanksgiving turkey I've ever seen.
John Schmidt must prove his claim to have unedited video of his bs claim.
That’s how it will remain until he does so or withdraws the claim.
Non believers have absolutely nothing to prove regarding his claim.
You're a boulder shy of a box of rocks and 6 tons shy of a half ton o' smarts. He made the claim and provided first hand accounts of both the original feat AND the recorded video evidence of it (including the billiards congress of America, which is the governing body for pool in the US). He has no more of a requirement to provide YOU with video proof as you need to open your brain case to prove you have brains, anyone who has heard you make an argument knows you don't have any.You are as full of sh*t as any thanksgiving turkey I've ever seen.
John Schmidt must prove his claim to have unedited video of his bs claim.
That’s how it will remain until he does so or withdraws the claim.
Non believers have absolutely nothing to prove regarding his claim.
You are as full of shit...
SoNever threw chalk at me or he wouldn‘t want to talk about the result of that throwing either.
Accurate synopsis.You're a boulder shy of a box of rocks and 6 tons shy of a half ton o' smarts. He made the claim and provided first hand accounts of both the original feat AND the recorded video evidence of it. He has no more of a requirement to provide YOU with video proof as you need to open your brain case to prove you have brains, anyone who has heard you make an argument knows you don't have any.
Jaden
Good one!If it was up yours, you’d know where it was.
I know you are but what am I?Sorry, but you’re as dumb as those rocks.
LOL, and this sums up the strength of radar's arguments... "I know you are but what am I?" LOLSorry, but you’re as dumb as those rocks.
Great minds and all that, but seriously, I don't think he even UNDERSTOOD the analogy I made...I know you are but what am I?
A classic defense.
Umm no...., more like surprised anyone was capable of being so clueless or incapable of rational thought.Uh uh. left ya reeling, no?