I just read the Judd article linked here, and at the bottom when it lists the sponsors, it says Diamond tables will be used. I thought it was Predator tables from recent news articles. Am I remembering wrong? Is the text I read wrong?
On Matchroom's site, they list both Predator and Diamond as sponsors. So maybe Predator balls and Diamond tab
For the US Open that was in Las Vegas, Diamond was the only table in the running because 33 tables had to be set up in about 24 hours. The single piece slate makes that possible. I believe that Matchroom Pool uses Rasson for a lot of it's pool events that only require a few tables.I just read the Judd article linked here, and at the bottom when it lists the sponsors, it says Diamond tables will be used. I thought it was Predator tables from recent news articles. Am I remembering wrong? Is the text I read wrong?
My FargoRate estimates
Slight favorite over anyone with FR under 700
Even money to slight underdog against anyone with FR between 700-750
Underdog to anyone with a FR over 750
For the US Open that was in Las Vegas, Diamond was the only table in the running because 33 tables had to be set up in about 24 hours. The single piece slate makes that possible. I believe that Matchroom Pool uses Rasson for a lot of it's pool events that only require a few tables.
I think you are off 50. He will be a slight favorite to players between 750 and 790 IMO. And underdog to those higher.
View attachment 608490 It's the leading headline on BBC's snooker home page - that can only be good for pool.
Just a question for the pool experts, in terms of prestige and strength in the field, is the US Open bigger than the World Championship?
A full break is only 36 shots and nearly none jacked up.Any thoughts? Shoots straighter than Dick Tracy. Can he win a match or two?
me too, I love that he tries his luck at the US Open. Also, I do not subscribe to the sentiment that it would be detrimental to pro-pool if he did well and got deep in this tournament, either. If he plays well, then he plays well! More power to him. Why would that take anything away from the 'real' professional poolplayers?I don't see any real downside, but plenty of upside for just about everyone concerned..exciting!!
disagree with the comment about SelbyI think it will be the same story as always when snooker players try themselves at pool.
Players who really try to make the transition are dangerous and even though they lack some key parts of the game, they can win tournaments. Mark Grey, Tony Drago, Chris Melling and not to forget Stuart Pettman, who had a 100+ 14.1 run at DCC in 2013.
And then there are all the others like Ronnie, Mark Williams, Jimmy White, John Higgins, Alex Higgins (maybe you can count Selby in as well), who played a few tournaments for marketing reasons and have never lived up to the hype.
So in the end Matchroom pays Judd a nice holiday in Vegas, with two TV matches, one against a low level opponent or maybe some golden oldie past his prime , which he will win to keep up the attention and the second match against a "name in the game", which he will lose and afterwards can give an interview showing his respect to pool.
But one thing is for sure, Matchroom knows how to create attention and sell their products and since this helps the players, the fans and the sport in general, I`m looking forward to Judd using a jump cue ;-)