Nice pool room you've got there, Sir.Congratulations I have the same light absolutely love it!!![]()
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk
Nice pool room you've got there, Sir.Congratulations I have the same light absolutely love it!!![]()
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk
This makes no sense. Why would you not want good lighting?Just watched the ’Hustler’ movie again on tv. I noticed the table lighting used at ‘Ames’ was the same I grew up with (3 low-hanging shaded incandescent bulb fixtures). I accept that equipment progression is inevitable (worsted cloth, resin composite balls, etc.), though I can’t help feeling that some historical limitations are a traditional part of the game that the legendary greats had to overcome. Shooting at a pink 4 ball, on blue cloth, with a fiberglass cue is far enough removed. The bright ‘daylight‘ LED lighting system would seem much like when the rack-boy at Ames inadvertently opened the window shade. Like the overhead wire score-string, the stereotypical dark ‘poolroom’ atmosphere I loved seems headed for oblivion.
The blue in "white light" is supposedly bad for the eyes and that dingy orange incandescent look is better. Don't know if that has been addressed in pool lighting - don't much care I've always preferred white light from florescent on.This makes no sense. Why would you not want good lighting?
Agreeed. Too cool is a bad thing as well. 5000K is about right. I hope you are being sarcastic about the incandescent lighting.The blue in "white light" is supposedly bad for the eyes and that dingy orange incandescent look is better. Don't know if that has been addressed in pool lighting - don't much care I've always preferred white light from florescent on.
Nope. Incandescent lighting is supposedly easier on the eyes. Then again, nobody buys lighting to stare at except for computer screens.Agreeed. Too cool is a bad thing as well. 5000K is about right. I hope you are being sarcastic about the incandescent lighting.
Incandescent is terrible for pool. All the colors are distorted and incandescent is traditionally dim making it hard to see the edge of the balls thus making it harder on the eyes. If it were superior, they'd be using it in pool rooms and professional events.Nope. Incandescent lighting is supposedly easier on the eyes. Then again, nobody buys lighting to stare at except for computer screens.![]()
I said nothing about pool. In fact I rate Edison bulbs just above pitch blackness.Incandescent is terrible for pool. All the colors are distorted and incandescent is traditionally dim making it hard to see the edge of the balls thus making it harder on the eyes. If it were superior, they'd be using it in pool rooms and professional events.
Myself personally (especially as my cataracts progress), I DO appreciate it. It’s just a nostalgia issue. Greenleaf & Mosconi seemed to manage ok somehow under traditional lighting. No matter how well I ever played under modern lights, I would always feel like I had an unfair advantage in comparison (not that I’m anxious to go back to carded cloth & mud balls though….can’t turn back the clock).This makes no sense. Why would you not want good lighting?
If given the choice, I can say with a fair amount of confidence Greenleaf and Mosconi would have preferred modern lighting.Myself personally (especially as my cataracts progress), I DO appreciate it. It’s just a nostalgia issue. Greenleaf & Mosconi seemed to manage ok somehow under traditional lighting. No matter how well I ever played under modern lights, I would always feel like I had an unfair advantage in comparison (not that I’m anxious to go back to carded cloth & mud balls though….can’t turn back the clock).
Have you installed a dimmer yet?Thanks! There is not a switch on the light to dim it but I asked an electrician and he said any newer LED light should work on a dimmer switch. I am going to replace the light switch it's on now with a switch with a dimmer. I'll let you know if it works or not.
Looks good! How many Lumens? Do you know the CRI?I have played on a GC 5 that had a perimeter light above it...the rectangle reflections that presented on the balls I found very distracting, Below is a pic of my GC1 that has a solid 8' by 2' led (5000k) over it. A solid led like mine presents less distracting reflections on the balls and has NO shadows reflected onto the table other than a small one beneath the ball.. I just don't understand logically speaking how you could improve on that. BTW, my lite I purchased and constructed for less than...... $ 125....
Prior to led lights, the incandescents and floresents all presented reflections on the balls and shadows on the table....I fear we might be regressing with this perimeter light fad...and an expensive fad it is, indeed....JMHO
I fully understand where you come from. I have an old school 4 light fixture that kinda matches the table time period, and I like it that way. It works fine, shots missed are my own fault, not lighting. Nothing against those in pursuit of perfection and I’m somewhat interested in this perimeter light upgrade as well. Although I think I’ll hold off until you guys have worked out all the bugs. Needs a diffuser in my opinion, or at least a better one. With the 4 light old school you can install low enough that sitting in a stool and watching my opponent take my lunch money is not uncomfortably bright to me.Myself personally (especially as my cataracts progress), I DO appreciate it. It’s just a nostalgia issue. Greenleaf & Mosconi seemed to manage ok somehow under traditional lighting. No matter how well I ever played under modern lights, I would always feel like I had an unfair advantage in comparison (not that I’m anxious to go back to carded cloth & mud balls though….can’t turn back the clock).
Thanks...7800 lumens.....CRI is 85....Looks good! How many Lumens? Do you know the CRI?