Here is a 10-question video quiz by Sharivari. I think one or two need more explanation. Comments?
in the video he shows the line of more angle so the answer was not so ambigiousThe bank shot more angle/less angle one was confusing to me, although now that I think about it, it was just due to wording. "When hitting a bank shot hard, do you have to aim for more angle or less angle?" was the question. I was thinking less angle because harder banks will bank with, you know, less angle. But the answer was more angle because I guess you have to have your aim point farther out so that when the bank is shortened it goes into the pocket. Not how I ever aim banks, and I guess I can understand it now, but poorly worded. "How does shooting hard affect bank shots?" would have been a much better wording.
Certainly a few trick questions in there that he could have been clearer on, as well as a few of his correct answers that are debatable, in my opinion.I think he makes a couple of errors. Anyone?
You don't want to be comparing his output to yours...Couldnt make it past the first minute.
The spoken English is using challenging ideas of physics, its mind breaking.
I believe the super long/ super hard result is due to the OB leaving the playing surface.I thought they were all mostly right, just some phrasing could be improved.
The one with shortening the banks when hitting harder I've heard some top players say that is generally true, except when super hard they can start to lenghen again. IDK though from my own ewperincecies its inconclusive to me (the super hard hit).
The bank shot more angle/less angle one was confusing to me, although now that I think about it, it was just due to wording. "When hitting a bank shot hard, do you have to aim for more angle or less angle?" was the question. I was thinking less angle because harder banks will bank with, you know, less angle. But the answer was more angle because I guess you have to have your aim point farther out so that when the bank is shortened it goes into the pocket. Not how I ever aim banks, and I guess I can understand it now, but poorly worded. "How does shooting hard affect bank shots?" would have been a much better wording.
Your posts are mind breaking.Couldnt make it past the first minute.
The spoken English is using challenging ideas of physics, its mind breaking.
It seems to me that moving either the cue ball or the object ball is going to change the tangent line from the original, but maybe I’m missing something here, or again maybe I’m getting tripped up by his phraseology.