Kikel... If someone gave it to me I would sell it. If refuse to advertise for him
Personally I couldn't wait to get rid of every Larry Vigus cue I ever had and I have had a few hundred.
Larry
Personally I couldn't wait to get rid of every Larry Vigus cue I ever had and I have had a few hundred.
Larry
Good one.Personally I couldn't wait to get rid of every Larry Vigus cue I ever had and I have had a few hundred.
Larry
Got to appreciate Dan's position though. Sometimes makers have a certain satisfaction that comes from building what is pleasing to them. I doubt I would have tried to charge an "ugly" tax though. I would have simply said I don't use that wood.well since everyone is dancing around the question, I will give my $.02
There are two cue makers that make very nice cues, that both play well (from what I have heard), but I have ZERO interest in ever owning one.
Dan Dishaw
John Barioni
Both of these are due to the piss poor attitude that I have heard from both of them. Barioni was via threads on AZB (arguing with Eric Crisp and Thomas Wayne if I remember correctly), and Dan Dishaw was about a phone conversation that I personally had with him many years ago. He pretty much told me that the cue I wanted would be ugly, and he didn't want to build it, so for it to be worth his time, he was going to charge me an extra $500 to build an ugly cue.
Customer service, and "likeability" are major factors in what makes the cue buying experience enjoyable for me. If you are not someone I would want to sit down and have a beer with, or shoot the breeze... I likely will never own one of your cues. These two gentlemen (while accomplish and competent cuemakers) pretty much pissed on any interest I would ever have in them.
Personally I couldn't wait to get rid of every Larry Vigus cue I ever had and I have had a few hundred.
Larry
Good one.
Got to appreciate Dan's position though. Sometimes makers have a certain satisfaction that comes from building what is pleasing to them. I doubt I would have tried to charge an "ugly" tax though. I would have simply said I don't use that wood.
I can understand getting turned off though. I am sure if you put case makers in as well you would see about a dozen response from people who won't buy from me because of my outspoken nature.
Good one.
Got to appreciate Dan's position though. Sometimes makers have a certain satisfaction that comes from building what is pleasing to them. I doubt I would have tried to charge an "ugly" tax though. I would have simply said I don't use that wood.
I can understand getting turned off though. I am sure if you put case makers in as well you would see about a dozen response from people who won't buy from me because of my outspoken nature.
Trob, its not come in their pants.
Its Jizz in My Pants.
Just for the Jizzers. The Jizz in My Pants Song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLnWf1sQkjY
So just put one of those cues in their hands and its Clean Up On Aisle Three.
I completely agree, it is rediculous. I wanted a mahogany (yes you heard me right) and birdseye plain jain wrapless, cored with straight grain maple. He told me that mahogany was too ugly to go in any cue, and to put his name on such an atrocity would cost me an extra $500 on top of normal build cost.
Why mahogany you ask? Because I am a drummer, and it is one of my favorite tone woods. Good enough for a $800 solid shell Craviotto snare drum, good enough for a cue.