Cuemakers......REAL...or.....PHONY ?

tikkler

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I think that when anyone is buying a so called custom cue, they should be told exactly what they are getting. With the huge influx of cue parts being available to anybody these days, it seems rather easy to make anything from a partial cue to a complete cue out of bought pieces. I myself have nothing against either way as long as I know what I am getting. If I wanted to buy a cue and the maker said he couldnt do a particular thing and he would have to get that somewhere else, I would be fine with it. The peoblem is I dont want to be led to believe that the entire cue was made by someone, and in actuality they bought almost the entire cue somewhere else and put there name on it.
Balabushka I dont believe ever claimed to make his own points, and look where it got him. I think when we are talking custom cues, we have a right to know the truth.....cant wait to hear what you guys think of this
Steve
 
I agree. That's one of the reasons I will not use somebody elses blanks and I will not do conversions. My cues are built by me.
 
how can you define custom crafted diff from assemblers/wannabe cuemaker ;)
 
tikkler said:
I think that when anyone is buying a so called custom cue, they should be told exactly what they are getting. With the huge influx of cue parts being available to anybody these days, it seems rather easy to make anything from a partial cue to a complete cue out of bought pieces. I myself have nothing against either way as long as I know what I am getting. If I wanted to buy a cue and the maker said he couldnt do a particular thing and he would have to get that somewhere else, I would be fine with it. The peoblem is I dont want to be led to believe that the entire cue was made by someone, and in actuality they bought almost the entire cue somewhere else and put there name on it.
Balabushka I dont believe ever claimed to make his own points, and look where it got him. I think when we are talking custom cues, we have a right to know the truth.....cant wait to hear what you guys think of this
Steve


I agree with you, there are makers and assemblers and guys in between both ends. Same thing in the luxery watch trade, big $$$ watches $100,000 and above, who made what is an important thing, there are few watch houses that make everything, no cue maker that I know of makes his ALL of his veneers or the screw in the butt cap, Tad was making tips, Jerry Franklin never did, some guys do make pieces and parts some dont, Whhen your spending $$ on a cue its nice to know who made what to a extent, but its not of paramount** importance to me.

there is nothing wrong with being a assembler, because that isnt as primitave as it sounds. Its like making spaghetti* sauce everybody has their own way and some people make it better than the oter guy, and none of them grew the tomatoes. Assembler dosent equal a lesser cue, hell it might make it a better cue because he has more time to tweak it. just a Monday night thought...


*No I didnt know how to spell "Spaghetti", I asked my girl friend after 5 tries, I couldnt get close to getting it right on my own

**Yes I did get "Paramount" right with no help
 
Last edited:
tikkler said:
I think that when anyone is buying a so called custom cue, they should be told exactly what they are getting. With the huge influx of cue parts being available to anybody these days, it seems rather easy to make anything from a partial cue to a complete cue out of bought pieces. I myself have nothing against either way as long as I know what I am getting. If I wanted to buy a cue and the maker said he couldnt do a particular thing and he would have to get that somewhere else, I would be fine with it. The peoblem is I dont want to be led to believe that the entire cue was made by someone, and in actuality they bought almost the entire cue somewhere else and put there name on it.
Balabushka I dont believe ever claimed to make his own points, and look where it got him. I think when we are talking custom cues, we have a right to know the truth.....cant wait to hear what you guys think of this
Steve

Steve, I completely agree with everything you have said in your post above mine. I also think that people making cues should be honest and up front with how they are building cues. If they are using Pre-made blanks say so, if they are using pre-made parts say so, if they are buying Finished Turned Shafts because they do not have the equipment or ability to turn them say so.

Prices for cues should be based upon a persons ability to make there cues. The more hands on work, the more time invested, and the more a cue should cost. Craftsmanship is the ability to do much more than assemble parts, in my opinion a true Craftsman makes his own parts to his own design, with his own hands.

Below is in my opinion a break down of how people building cue can be rated. The reason I say can be is because there is no other system I have been able to find that identifies and gives names to the different levels and work accomplished at each level.

I believe that the term Cue Makers should be divided into three categories, which are Cue Builder and Master Cue Maker.

The following are what I believe identifies which category some one falls into, but let me also say these are my terminologies and mine alone. To my limited knowledge there is no written criteria that identifies the separation of the three groups.

Cue Builder:

1. To be a cue builder you must have the ability to repair / restore most cues brought to you by customers. This includes complete refinish work if requested by a customer.

2. Cue builders in most cases learn to build cues on their own by repairing cues. The techniques learned by doing repairs are often used in the beginning to build basic cues without points or from blanks pre-made with or without Veneers, and from coverted house cues. They also have the ability to prepare wood for cue construction. This wood may be purchased in board form, pre-cut squares, or in pre-doweled rounds.

3. Many cue builders that were not taught by some experienced craftsman learned their trade in the two above categories. In addition they learned by buying books or by completely disassembling broken cues that can not be repaired. I fall into this category myself, I am completely self taught, and I learned all aspects of cue building by trial and error. The fact is most of the Cue Makers today that are considered Master Craftsman are self taught. In addition, most cue builders do not have the ability to do inlays in a cues forearm or a cues butt, and their equipment is limited to the tasks at hand, which is mostly repairing or refinishing of cues.


Cue Maker:

1. A cue maker has progressed to the point where their skills fall in between a cue builder and a master cue maker. These individuals can make basic point construction such as Butterfly Points and V-Cut / V-spliced (Inlay-ed Points) but have not perfected these techniques to perfection.

2. Cue makers still rely mainly on purchased blanks and even old house cues to for cues they are building. Cue makers generally have all the equipment necessary to preform all phases of cue construction, however, they do not have the necessary experience and techniques to move on to the next level.

Master Cue Maker:

1. Master Cue Makers can do anything a Cue Builder or a Cue Maker can, however, they still will use pre-made blanks or house cues to build cues with points upon a customers request. Master Cue Makers produce their own blanks either by excepted standards or by standards they have developed on their own and are theirs alone. Master Cue Makers in my opinion can produce any form of cue construction from a Full Spliced Blank to their chosen style of Butterfly Blanks. In addition the only parts of the cue they do not make themselves are the Metal Connecting Screws, Metal, Resin, or Wood Joint pins, and the cues Rubber Bumpers. Also Master Cue Builders either hand inlay their cues or use other forms of machinery either manual or CNC Controlled to cut pockets for a cues inlays.

Today, in my opinion the number of cue makers that would fall into the Master Cue maker Category would number less then 100 world wide. Most people building cues today are nothing more than Cue Builders, or Cue makers, while some of these people do not move up by choice most do not have the ability to ever achieve the title Master Cue Maker.


I hope this helps explain the differences in levels of ability and construction techniques. I am certain that I have left some information out that others would add, and I am also certain that some will not agree with my comments in general. I am not an expert, however, I have tried to explain what I believe to be true, if anyone has anything to add that I have missed please add it. I am now nothing more than a student, and I am always looking to learn something new.

Hope this helps!!
 
hey

I agree 100 %....but all I ask is dont be an assembler trying to disguise yourself as a true complete craftsman. As I said before I am fine with either, as long as I know what I am getting..Steve
 
Interesting thread, Steve.....and great insights so far. Can't wait to see others' thoughts on this subject.

Personally, I feel that a cuemaker should make their own spliced (or inlaid) prongs and do their own inlay work, not buy pre-made prongs, butt sleeves, cue kits, and such. For a hobbyist, those things would be fine imho....but not a professional cuemaker. I don't have a problem with somebody doing conversions of things such as a bar cue, Titlist, Spain blank, or what have you, as long as that doesn't define them and their cues.

However, to me it's totally acceptable to buy things like pins, tips, and bumpers from somewhere. Making those items from scratch would be tedious, completely inefficient, and borderline crazy. A cuemaker's time is better spent doing other things.

In short, Steve, I agree with you...I would like to know the source, rather than be led to believe something is what it's not.
 
I'll chime in & say if a cuemaker won't take into account your specific specs & build what you THINK you want I wouldn't consider them a cuemaker. There are so many assemblers out there impersonating as cuemakers that it is scary. I had Gus Szamboti make me a one of at the time with ying yang veneers of black & white & he stated it was a first but what the hell & I've heard he did a few with the same motif afterward. I sure wish I still had that branch but sold it to a kid in Elyria. Ohio who was crippled in a freak accident while driving a towmotor with no cage & steel fell on him. I won't name names but it pays to do some leg work & find outthe real cigar!
 
tikkler said:
I think that when anyone is buying a so called custom cue, they should be told exactly what they are getting. With the huge influx of cue parts being available to anybody these days, it seems rather easy to make anything from a partial cue to a complete cue out of bought pieces. I myself have nothing against either way as long as I know what I am getting. If I wanted to buy a cue and the maker said he couldnt do a particular thing and he would have to get that somewhere else, I would be fine with it. The peoblem is I dont want to be led to believe that the entire cue was made by someone, and in actuality they bought almost the entire cue somewhere else and put there name on it.
Balabushka I dont believe ever claimed to make his own points, and look where it got him. I think when we are talking custom cues, we have a right to know the truth.....cant wait to hear what you guys think of this
Steve

Steve,
You mention two different era's. I bet no one asked George Balabushka where his parts came from. Back then they bought a cue to use, not to take pictures of and get in the blue book. I bet no one before the first blue book and encyclopedia knew what WICO was.

Now you have a different set of parameters for buying cues. You also have a plethora of cue parts to choose from. Partner that with the internet "world" community and you get a market that is chock full of choices. But it all should be disclosed one way or another.

JV
 
yo

I also see it as a slap in the face to all the hard working guys who are producing their own products and make an okay living but arent getting rich. They do it because they love what they do, and that is commendable. To buy parts and just slap your name on it to make 4 times the profit that a real builder would make is wrong...............and keeping it a secret is wrong, but hopefully we can differentiate between the two, but thats not alllways the case...Steve
 
joe

joe....yes I mention different eras, but the bottom line never changes........be honest not deceptive....Steve
 
what does WICO mean?

OK you got me....what does WICO mean?
Nick

classiccues said:
Steve,
You mention two different era's. I bet no one asked George Balabushka where his parts came from. Back then they bought a cue to use, not to take pictures of and get in the blue book. I bet no one before the first blue book and encyclopedia knew what WICO was.

Now you have a different set of parameters for buying cues. You also have a plethora of cue parts to choose from. Partner that with the internet "world" community and you get a market that is chock full of choices. But it all should be disclosed one way or another.

JV
 
I'm wondering where "deceptive" comes into this question. Did someone say they built their own full splice sneaky, and then you found out they didn't?

Fairly common knowledge that very very few cuemakers make their own full splice for sneaky style cues.

Davis makes blanks, so does prather and schmekle I believe. Some have nice veeners. They are selling them to someone after all. Davis usually gets credit on his blanks, because their is a perceived value there.

On sneaky style cues I expect it be a purchased blank for the most part. Other cues I like to know if its a blank purchased or not. Reality is I buy players cues, not collector items like you have. If the cue plays well, has a taper I like, then I'll buy another.
 
manwon said:
Steve, I completely agree with everything you have said in your post above mine. I also think that people making cues should be honest and up front with how they are building cues. If they are using Pre-made blanks say so, if they are using pre-made parts say so, if they are buying Finished Turned Shafts because they do not have the equipment or ability to turn them say so.

Prices for cues should be based upon a persons ability to make there cues. The more hands on work, the more time invested, and the more a cue should cost. Craftsmanship is the ability to do much more than assemble parts, in my opinion a true Craftsman makes his own parts to his own design, with his own hands.

Below is in my opinion a break down of how people building cue can be rated. The reason I say can be is because there is no other system I have been able to find that identifies and gives names to the different levels and work accomplished at each level.

I believe that the term Cue Makers should be divided into three categories, which are Cue Builder and Master Cue Maker.

The following are what I believe identifies which category some one falls into, but let me also say these are my terminologies and mine alone. To my limited knowledge there is no written criteria that identifies the separation of the three groups.

Cue Builder:

1. To be a cue builder you must have the ability to repair / restore most cues brought to you by customers. This includes complete refinish work if requested by a customer.

2. Cue builders in most cases learn to build cues on their own by repairing cues. The techniques learned by doing repairs are often used in the beginning to build basic cues without points or from blanks pre-made with or without Veneers, and from coverted house cues. They also have the ability to prepare wood for cue construction. This wood may be purchased in board form, pre-cut squares, or in pre-doweled rounds.

3. Many cue builders that were not taught by some experienced craftsman learned their trade in the two above categories. In addition they learned by buying books or by completely disassembling broken cues that can not be repaired. I fall into this category myself, I am completely self taught, and I learned all aspects of cue building by trial and error. The fact is most of the Cue Makers today that are considered Master Craftsman are self taught. In addition, most cue builders do not have the ability to do inlays in a cues forearm or a cues butt, and their equipment is limited to the tasks at hand, which is mostly repairing or refinishing of cues.


Cue Maker:

1. A cue maker has progressed to the point where their skills fall in between a cue builder and a master cue maker. These individuals can make basic point construction such as Butterfly Points and V-Cut / V-spliced (Inlay-ed Points) but have not perfected these techniques to perfection.

2. Cue makers still rely mainly on purchased blanks and even old house cues to for cues they are building. Cue makers generally have all the equipment necessary to preform all phases of cue construction, however, they do not have the necessary experience and techniques to move on to the next level.

Master Cue Maker:

1. Master Cue Makers can do anything a Cue Builder or a Cue Maker can, however, they still will use pre-made blanks or house cues to build cues with points upon a customers request. Master Cue Makers produce their own blanks either by excepted standards or by standards they have developed on their own and are theirs alone. Master Cue Makers in my opinion can produce any form of cue construction from a Full Spliced Blank to their chosen style of Butterfly Blanks. In addition the only parts of the cue they do not make themselves are the Metal Connecting Screws, Metal, Resin, or Wood Joint pins, and the cues Rubber Bumpers. Also Master Cue Builders either hand inlay their cues or use other forms of machinery either manual or CNC Controlled to cut pockets for a cues inlays.

Today, in my opinion the number of cue makers that would fall into the Master Cue maker Category would number less then 100 world wide. Most people building cues today are nothing more than Cue Builders, or Cue makers, while some of these people do not move up by choice most do not have the ability to ever achieve the title Master Cue Maker.


I hope this helps explain the differences in levels of ability and construction techniques. I am certain that I have left some information out that others would add, and I am also certain that some will not agree with my comments in general. I am not an expert, however, I have tried to explain what I believe to be true, if anyone has anything to add that I have missed please add it. I am now nothing more than a student, and I am always looking to learn something new.

Hope this helps!!

its interesting how people think these days, we classify things carefully these days and mince up words now days until we have it just right, which is cool as were all smarter and we think like computers with logic, so having said all that I think there needs to be a ranking higher than Master Cue Maker For the elite of the group, i'll name just one name who Barry Szam told me is Ernie (Ginacue) he is off the chart with what he dd 40 years ago and now, he meets or exceeds your standard and there a few more "Grand Masters"....cool now we sound like chess players ranking each other.:smile:
 
Nick B said:
OK you got me....what does WICO mean?
Nick


they sell parts to cue maker, google them, they also sell pin ball parts, video game stuff for arcades etc they have been around forever.

what the deal with this thread is if a guy actually makes or builds the cue or buys parts from WICO and just slaps it together but acts like he actually made something on his own. Taking credit for something he didnt make himself.
 
classiccues said:
Steve,
You mention two different era's. I bet no one asked George Balabushka where his parts came from. Back then they bought a cue to use, not to take pictures of and get in the blue book. I bet no one before the first blue book and encyclopedia knew what WICO was.

Now you have a different set of parameters for buying cues. You also have a plethora of cue parts to choose from. Partner that with the internet "world" community and you get a market that is chock full of choices. But it all should be disclosed one way or another.

JV

JV, that is certainly very true there is a big difference between Era's. Forty years ago, all the necessary supplies, and machinery were not availble like today. Cue makers of the past where pioneers in this feild, and should be respected as such. Not many are left today who started in the early 1960's and none of the gentlemen who came before can be compared to cue makers of today.
 
hey

Would love to hear from more of you dealers....be interesting to see what you think of this. Dont be shy boys....step up to the plate..Steve
 
Back
Top