1. the cut out wedge serves no purpose in the modern game apart from as a reference point.
2. the brass ferrule is again just something that has been used for a long time, it provides a stiff hit. I personally would like to replace it with something that would have the same consistency, but would glue better, and not become as dull or dirty etc. Maybe the ferrule material used for pool break cues, is it available in white, anyone know?
3. the brass joint in my opinion SHOULD be replaced with a nice wood to wood pool cue joint as it DEADENS the feel and cuts the feedback. This is something i am looking to do right now as soon as i find a reputable maker willing to take it on
It has been done before and the owner claims with wood2wood his cue feels like a one piece (good). This i believe is also part of the reason why most snooker cues are 3/4. There are ofcourse also balancing issues etc.
4. maple and ash are both solid choices for a snooker cue.
this is just a guess: sugar maple originates from the US, whereas traditionally ash would have been more readily available for the UK cuemakers thus, became the traditional wood for a shaft.
I have played with both ash and maple for an extended period of time (3 and 4 years respectively), and prefer ash. I have an ash pool cue shaft currently in the works by a snooker cue maker.
in conclusion i would just like to say, that similarly to the game itself, snooker cue construction relies heavily on tradition. i am trying to work with various makers in the uk and us to combine the 2 crafts, but it is quite difficult to convince some of them
... however i will have a few cues coming through fairly soon by the best cuemakers from both continents and results will be shown and recorded - some of these cues just might become available to purchase btw
any questions shoot me a pm and i can try to answer or contact my snooker cue maker..
cheers, olly