Comments on Poolology

[Renegade_56]

It's amazing that the people who have argued for years that you cannot use lines through perceived portions of a cue ball and object ball that the developer has spent like 20 years fine tuning, after just a couple of weeks use, are raving about a method that uses only one line through perceived sections of a cue ball and an object ball, that the developer admits breaks down on certain positions on the table.

And they argue over terms like objective and subjective.

 

[BC21]

It's amazing that the people who have argued for years that you cannot use lines through perceived portions of a cue ball and object ball that the developer has spent like 20 years fine tuning, after just a couple of weeks use, are raving about a method that uses only one line through perceived sections of a cue ball and an object ball, that the developer admits breaks down on certain positions on the table.

And they argue over terms like objective and subjective.

I guess it boils down to simplicity. The one line is through the center of both balls -- very easy to visualize. And the breaking down of the system occurs on less than 1% of the table's playing surface.

 

[azhousepro]

Was this really necessary? Are you capable of debating something without the snide remarks?

Compared to an "old dog" like you, I'm a pup. Glad to see you looking forward to his book. Hope your fading memory doesn't forget by then. :grin: