And that same logic doesn't apply to a threaded ferrule because.......???
If the shaft is subject to moisture exchange, the wood will respond the same, regardless of whether it's
tenon is threaded or not. The epoxy doesn't care much either.
There's probably a reason why there are two common approaches to installing a ferrule and not just two.
Each has it's merits though I've never heard that resistance to moisture exchange was among them.
KJ
And that same logic doesn't apply to a threaded ferrule because.......???
If the shaft is subject to moisture exchange, the wood will respond the same, regardless of whether it's
tenon is threaded or not. The epoxy doesn't care much either.
There's probably a reason why there are two common approaches to installing a ferrule and not just two.
Each has it's merits though I've never heard that resistance to moisture exchange was among them.
KJ
Threading ferrules give more glue surface area, same reason why full splices are generally considered better.
A larger tenon diameter also provides for greater glue surface area.
Comparing the full-splice surface area concept to a threaded tenon is apples to oranges.
There is no threading involved in full-splice construction.
KJ
A larger tenon diameter also provides for greater glue surface area.
Comparing the full-splice surface area concept to a threaded tenon is apples to oranges.
There is no threading involved in full-splice construction.
The threading of a tenon creates a 'minor diameter'. That minor diameter becomes the tenon's weak point.
Ex: What started out as a 5/16 dia. tenon, with threading is now reduced to a .250/.280" cross sectional
diameter. I fail to see how that has made threaded tenon construction stronger.
In that scenario, what started out to be an attempt to make the ferrule/tenon construction stronger,
has actually made it weaker.
I guess I just haven't seen as many ferrules falling off because they were sleeved instead of threaded as you guys have.
Maybe it's the glue.
KJ
Regardless, why the assumption that the size is 5/16? Mc Dermott have been using a 3/8 tenon with just the top 1/4 inch or so threaded I would guess for production reasons. The threads eliminate the need for clamping.A larger tenon diameter also provides for greater glue surface area.
Comparing the full-splice surface area concept to a threaded tenon is apples to oranges.
There is no threading involved in full-splice construction.
The threading of a tenon creates a 'minor diameter'. That minor diameter becomes the tenon's weak point.
Ex: What started out as a 5/16 dia. tenon, with threading is now reduced to a .250/.280" cross sectional
diameter. I fail to see how that has made threaded tenon construction stronger.
In that scenario, what started out to be an attempt to make the ferrule/tenon construction stronger,
has actually made it weaker.
I guess I just haven't seen as many ferrules falling off because they were sleeved instead of threaded as you guys have.
Maybe it's the glue.
KJ
Bull,,,,,,,,respectfully.
A threaded diameter has about 3 times the surface area as the same diameter unthreaded. More surface area means better glue bond,,,,,,if not you need better glue. Increasing the tenon diameter gives a small amount more surface, "some" more ridgidity that may not be needed, and substantially reduces the strength of the ferrulle because of it's thinner walls. Whether you turn the tenons or thread them is up to you, but from an engineering standpoint they are definitely stronger with threads.
The point about cross section diameter is pretty much irrelevent since the pressures are almost exclusively axial, so any weakening in diameter is replaced and actually enhanced by the addition of a more stable, more durable material, or "ferrule". In either case it stays put with a sufficient glue bond,,,,but in the event that glue bond deteriorates,,,,I like threads for a backup.
Production, no.I'll let you rethink your numbers on the '3 times' increase of the surface area claim.
It's more like a 1/3 increase in surface area and that's only in the threaded section.
There obviously is no increase in the unthreaded section. That 1/3 increase of surface area comes at a cost,
that being a reduced diameter cross-section by virtue of a minor diameter.
The cross-section diameter becomes VERY relevant when striking the QB off center.
Now you're starting to side-load the ferrule and this is where/when the tenon breaks.
A thicker, unthreaded tenon will resist the lateral force better than one with a minor (reduced) diameter.
That should just be common sense.
As far as needing better glue, we pretty much have that today. There may have been a time when threading the
tenon was needed to compensate for inferior glues but I think it's safe to say that those days are past.
I'm certainly not interested in going back to them but learning from them and moving on.
Ferrule strength, hmmm.
I use a large dia., unthreaded tenon and I honestly have never known one of my ferrule installs to fail.
They are not 1" long and they are linen based. If they weren't white you could call them rolled & molded phenolic.
Isn't that what J/B cues are using today?
Ferrule strength and my unthreaded BIG tenon are not causing me any concerns.
At the end of the day, it doesn't matter to me what you do and what I do shouldn't matter to you.
There are at least two schools of thought on this subject. I'm not saying either one is wrong.
I do like one better than the other though.
Hopefully, the OP has gained from the diversity of opinion; maybe not.
If this discussion has been food for thought, I'll throw in desert.
Does anyone know of any L/D shaft that uses a screwed-on ferrule???
KJ