fact is career money leader in 1997 was Greg Norman with just around $12 million .....
since tiger woods has come in he has one $94 million ....prize money clearly had a direct correlation with advent of Tiger Woods ....
so while Arnold is a nice guy ....he didn't make millions playing golf and he certainly didn't raise the prize money like tiger did....
ask any progolfer what they think about tiger woods ....and they will say at the very least he brought tons of money to the game and thus to them ....
Think you misunderstood me. Not making light of Tiger's huge contribution.
Just taking note of the fact that golf was like pool until Arnie. Prize money did not pay the bills and most of the pros, and Sam Snead spoke of it often, had to hustle on the side to make ends meet until Arnie raised the sport's profile.
Arnie built the strong foundation on which the house called pro golf stands. Tiger deserves much credit for the way he subsequently elevated the sport, but there were dominating golfers before Arnie. Byron Nelson once won eleven PGA tour events in a row, but it didn't matter, because he played a sport that had no credibility and no real following. Until Arnie and others who followed his lead made golf credible and attractive to sponsors, no amount of domination within the sport was enough to deliver pro golf from obscurity.
Pro pool does not have a storng foundation, and even if someone, just like Byron Nelson, manages to dominate the sport (and, it can easily argued that Immonen did just that in 2009), it won't be enough.
Fix the foundation, then build the house. It was that way for golf, and so it must be for pool.
Thanks for your insights.