Mr. Wadsworth:
I understand your position, and I have been patient until now to not disrespect you, in spite of your constant disrespect and attacks on me personally because I am not a full-time cue maker.
Yes, the forum section is entitled "ask the cue maker" I do not argue that point. Please also note the name of the specific thread entitled "Spray Automotive Clear Coat?" Maybe if the exact same topic was in the general forum you would be OK with my answer to the question? (Which, by the way, would have been exactly the same.)
I have a great deal of experience spraying Automotive Clear Coats on cars, trucks, motorcycles, guitars, bicycles and even a cue. That is what was asked and I felt that the forum could benefit from my experience in this area.
I am merely passing on that experience with the product directly related to the topic at hand- I am not jumping down the throat of another poster do discredit them and let the world know their opinion on the true subject at hand is invalid because "You Sir Are Not A Cue maker yet you keep on implying that you are." I am someone who has made a cue, and in process of another which I have posted here step-by-step for the world to see.
Water based clear coats was a derailment of the thread that you embraced in an attempt to discredit me. And my experience with water based clear, when I used it, was not a positive one, and I therefore relayed that information to the forum. I am pleased you have had good results with the product(s) you have chosen to use on your cues. Both pieces of information are an opinion, and the wise reader will collect all the comments and opinions and move forward on their own accord.
I respect you as a cue maker, and I also have respect for the quality of the work you do. However, do not use the fact that I am not an established, full-time cue maker to discredit the useful information I provide to the other members of this forum. You also had a first and second cue. Just like everyone else who has ever made, or currently makes, cues full time or otherwise.
I think I have been tolerant to your attacks and respectful to you and the other members of this forum throughout this but enough is enough. If you do not appreciate my replies to questions then do not read them. You can put me on your ignore list as well if you prefer. Or, PM me any time for my e-mail and phone number and we can discuss this like proper gentlemen.
Thank you Mr. Wadsworth for taking the time to read this, and my deepest apologies to other members of this forum for this outburst. I sincerely hope this is the first and last time this happens.
Mr. CueGuru:
Perhaps my tone was a little harsh. I admit I could have been more tactful.
My point about this forum being "Ask the Cuemaker" was that if experienced
cuemakers answer the questions the reader can expect to get good information
from those of us who have build hundreds or thousands of cues. The word
CueGuru implys that you have much more knowledge and experience in
cuemaking than you have shown to have. As I understand it you have only
build one cue. I don't think that qualifies you to lend advise to someone
has more experience than you do. At this stage you should be asking
questions - not answering them.
While you have experience in finishing other objects it does not necessarily
extend to finishing cues. I have found that finishing cues to be the most
difficult part of cuemaking. It has taken me years to perfect my finish. You
stated quite strongly that water based finishes were no good. That simply
is not true. I know this for a fact because I have used it for a number of
years. A number of other cuemakers here in Florida have seen my finish
and been quite impressed. If other cuemakers like it then I know it is OK.
As to having once built only one or two cues you are correct. At that point
in my career I was listening instead of offering advise.
I wish you success in your endeavors.