I see and agree with your point however would that not be considered price gouging and be illegal? Point being Mike is not price gouging nope doing anything Illegal.
I believe that is the definition of it, from a legal perspective.
I see and agree with your point however would that not be considered price gouging and be illegal? Point being Mike is not price gouging nope doing anything Illegal.
Ever been in one? You now live in the tornado capital of the world, OkC. Wait til you wake-up(hopefully) and your s^*t is scattered for a couple miles. You won't complain one bit. Most places are cool and don't do it but at that point you really don't care.
Once thought to be globally extinct, black-footed ferrets are making a comeback. For the last thirty years, concerted efforts from many state and federal agencies, zoos, Native American tribes, conservation organizations and private landowners have given black-footed ferrets a second chance for survival. Today, recovery efforts have helped restore the black-footed ferret population to nearly 300 animals across North America.
He isn't double dipping though. He is not getting two entry fees for one spot. It isn't an entry fee if a person isn't playing (an entry fee requires an entrant) and so you have to stop thinking of it as an entry fee at that point because it no longer is. It is now simply unused money. That unused money can either go back to the player in the form of a refund, or if there is a fine for withdrawals, it can be applied to that. In this case there is a fine for withdrawals and so that unused money gets applied to the withdrawal fine. And of course Mike should sell the entry spot that is now open, unused, and unpaid for.
All Mike is doing is charging a $200 fine for withdrawals to discourage people from signing up if they are not serious and committed, and to reduce the chances that players he advertised as being in the field don't end up playing, and for his hassle in having to deal with the substitutions. Now whether we like this policy or not is largely personal preference and opinion, and whether it is the best policy or not is debatable and depends on whose perspective you are looking at it from and who you are hoping to benefit, but it isn't double dipping, it isn't dishonest or unethical, and he does have some compelling and good reasons for doing it this way.
JAM - on the Golden Tee forum site, once a thread gets to 10 pages, the unwritten rule is that people can post porn as a distraction. You might want to try that instead of prairie dogs. :grin:
An Orgy, just for you. :thumbup:
I believe that is the definition of it, from a legal perspective.
You can't be serious with this post thinking that when a player hands over $200 it is not an entry fee.
An Orgy, just for you. :thumbup:
At least ten times since I started playing pool tournaments, I have not played after I paid
my entry fee.....sometimes a priority thing, sometimes a missed plane, sometimes I just
didn't feel like playing on that date.
I never found out if there was a refund policy for those entries...I didn't care.
pt....not everyone's a nit
At least ten times since I started playing pool tournaments, I have not played after I paid
my entry fee.....sometimes a priority thing, sometimes a missed plane, sometimes I just
didn't feel like playing on that date.
I never found out if there was a refund policy for those entries...I didn't care.
pt....not everyone's a nit
Ever been in one? You now live in the tornado capital of the world, OkC. Wait til you wake-up(hopefully) and your s^*t is scattered for a couple miles. You won't complain one bit. Most places are cool and don't do it but at that point you really don't care.
JAM - on the Golden Tee forum site, once a thread gets to 10 pages, the unwritten rule is that people can post porn as a distraction. You might want to try that instead of prairie dogs. :grin: