Do you mean "each tip size"?What's the shape and size of the surface area of the contact between tip and cue ball for each tip shape with a center ball hit?
No, I mean shape. For the same shape, the area of contact should be the same no matter the tip/shaft diameter (at least until the extreme point where the diameter is smaller than the contact area could be with that tip shape but then we're talking tiny tiny tip). A 13mm diameter in the shape of a nickel should have the same contact area as an 11mm diameter in the same shape.Do you mean "each tip size"?
pj
chgo
Yes - the shape, not the size, matters.A 13mm diameter in the shape of a nickel should have the same contact area as an 11mm diameter in the same shape.
As someone who plays both snooker and pool (and all other billiard games apart from Pyramid), let me tell you why tip size matters.I thought I understood why a snooker player would have a smaller shaft diameter (typically 8.5-9.5mm) than American pool players (typically 11.75-13). But when thinking about it more, why wouldn't a snooker-sized shaft work for pool? What is actually gained, in either direction?
More perplexingly to me is that apparently 10.5mm is the preferred size for Chinese 8-ball, which uses the same sized balls and same sized table as American pool. Why wouldn't the desired shafts be the same size? And, since Chinese 8-ball is a more recent development, what lead to this "new' shaft size? (Just marketing??)
I watched the below "what's in the bag" video with Chris Melling who seems to play everything, and even he uses smaller shafts for Snooker/English pool than for American pool, and then talks about concerns with the 10.5 shaft (vs the 11.8) starting at about the 6:54 mark, eventually saying "if the shaft's thinner, then you've got to be more accurate."
So are the differences in shaft sizes between the games just traditional wisdom, or is there actual merit to it all?
I've used a 9.5-10.0mm tip playing pool for 30+ years, playing just like I would with a bigger tip, with never a problem. I don't think there's a tip size issue.I do know someone who uses a snooker cue for pool, but its a gamble and he is very careful with it.
Do you have a thin brass ferrule? Because with a hard enough shot, it WILL dig into the shoulder of the cue. I've seen it several times.I've used a 9.5-10.0mm tip playing pool for 30+ years, playing just like I would with a bigger tip, with never a problem. I don't think there's a tip size issue.
pj
chgo
Nope - my ferrule is ~1/4" long, made of plastic, not as thin as a brass ferrule.Do you have a thin brass ferrule? Because with a hard enough shot, it WILL dig into the shoulder of the cue. I've seen it several times.
Thick cues are stiffer than thinner cues and so cause more ‘deflection’ of the ball off its straight path when hit to the side of cente . Carbon fibre in the shaft allows the cue to give way - be weaker - when hit off center reducing ball deflection.Doesn't carbon fiber change that?
Thick cues are stiffer than thinner cues and so cause more ‘deflection’ of the ball off its straight path when hit to the side of cente . Carbon fibre in the shaft allows the cue to give way - be weaker - when hit off center reducing ball deflection.
Deflection from shooting lower than centerball is called bottom spin. Thin cues are weaker than thick cues; they bend more and that is a loss of power. Being weaker means less draw.
Besides needing a playing cue, a break cue, and a jump cue, do we now need a bottom cue as well?
/nitpicking/Thick cues are stiffer than thinner cues and so cause more ‘deflection’
Do you have a thin brass ferrule? Because with a hard enough shot, it WILL dig into the shoulder of the cue. I've seen it several times.
/nitpicking//nitpicking/
They are generally stiffer and cause more squirt, but it's their added mass that does it, not their stiffness.
/nitpicking/
pj
chgo
What was the reason again for why you need 60° of arc?
The arc cos of 60 or cos -1 (60) helps promote the newest in Predator Billiard Ball technology. The arcos set I read it as arc-cosine