How do you know it is going to match, that you are viewing the visuals from the correct position?
CTE/Pro One Practice Table Set Up 2
- Thread starter nobcitypool
- Start date
How do you know it is going to match, that you are viewing the visuals from the correct position?
That is not objective, I could see any visual line up I wish from any position that puts me one half tip sweep away.
In other words, from the correct position I could draw a line from cte, or eta, or etb, or etc, and so on.
If you don't have to be in line with the visuals then you can stand at any angle and draw a line between any two points.
Your ONLY purpose is to discredit CTE.
For the most part, it is natural for any player to use their visual strengths at ball address just the same as they would during full stance.
I can assure you that I will not be acquiring my visuals from a left eye perspective unless I choose to do so and I might even do that for some 1/8 ball overlap shots. CTE PRO ONE offers great flexibility in this area.
Once a person becomes aware of their visual alignment strengths during full stance, it's quite simple to shift to that perspective for acquiring the visuals.
Stan Shuffett
In spite of what you think, my purpose is to understand cte because my curiosity drives me. In order to understand it I will need to ask the tough questions.
There's a huge difference between curiosity, stupidity and trolling. The questions you ask fall into one of the latter two, perhaps both.
You absolutely cannot position your eyes anywhere you wish and still acquire your visuals. You can have different body positions and acquire the visuals by tilting your head, bending over, etc.. As long as you acquire the correct visual and sweep into the shot correctly, you'll be on the correct aim line. What's so difficult to understand about that?
You've gotten enough warnings, you must want to be banned from here. You're not fooling anyone with your trolling actions.
Your questions may seem tough to you but they're actually quite simple.
Stan Shuffett
No Sir, I don't want to be banned, I have made that clear. I am not trolling either.
Did you watch the video Primo posted? If not then watch it and you will see that my questions are legit. At least I hope you will see it.
Did you see where Stan said I was correct, you can perceive both lines from many offset positions?
If that is the case then you have some fundamental perception problems that is limiting your success with the system. You need to go back through the DVD and practice the simple shots until you recognize what you need to look for. The perception is very objective, and only in one place.
then give me a simple answer please.
My answers are simple. Visual focal point at ball address matches visual alignment during full stance. It does not take long for ball pocketing success to bear this out but one must get on a table to experience this.
You will not draw it out on paper.
Stan Shuffett
If that is all you've got for me then we can just quit discussing it here. I've tried it on the table and determined that a system that requires the visuals to be in line with my eyes is a system that leaves gaps and a system that requires you to see the visuals from a position not in line with my eyes is a system where I am open to stand at whatever offset position I want and draw imaginary lines from any objective point to any objective point. This method will work but it is not objective. It is just a matter of figuring out where to stand that puts you one half tip pivot away from the shot line. It is much easier in my eyes just to figure out where to stand that puts you on the shot line.
Last edited:
I expect nothing positive from you EVER. I am sorry that your experiences with connecting to a professional aiming dystem have failed for you.
I think it's great if we never communicate again. You are all about negativity. You are NOT fooling me with your undercover stuff.
Stan Shuffett
You have made that clear. A Stan without the victim mentality might have had an answer for me.
It's all good though. I know what my intentions were.
Last edited:
You have one goal at this point and that is to disrupt anything positive about CTE.
That is your opinion only about "victim mentality".
If you are so interested in CTE, go ahead and do a video of some of your findings. Present some shots that do not work...
Stan Shuffett
Yeah right, I'll dare he talk back to the man who said he is all about negativity.
Last edited:
Your record clearly shows a thread of negativity toward my work.
If you do not like CTE then do something else instead of engaging in regular negativity toward What is clearly known to be a perceptual system. Accept it and get over it... Just go ahead and finish.
Stan Shuffett
For the record. I still maintain that my questions were neautral made up of a pinch of disbelief and a pinch of hope to be shown different.
Last edited:
I do agree though that it is time to move on.
Best of wishes to all of you. Perhaps if we speak on a different subforum or on the main forum we can maintain a better conversation but I realize that as long as this subforum consists mainly of cte discussion, it is not for me.
Best of wishes to all of you. Perhaps if we speak on a different subforum or on the main forum we can maintain a better conversation but I realize that as long as this subforum consists mainly of cte discussion, it is not for me.