How many people with very negative opinions about the Predator table, have actually played on one?? Or set one up / worked on one???

trentfromtoledo

8onthebreaktoledo
Silver Member
How many people with very negative opinions about the Predator table, have actually played on one??

Or set one up / worked on one???

Or the Rasson for that matter?? I have heard a TON of strong opinions, but, any facts to back them up?

TFT
 
Last edited:
To be honest Trent, I don't think I need to play on one to give an opinion. As it stands now, the table is not designed to endure the purpose for which it was built: frequent setup and teardown for tournament play. I'm certain it is a fine table once it is setup properly and is not moved but that's not the intended purpose. When you have elite professional players forfeiting matches because of table conditions, that says all you need to know. I hope they are successful for all the reasons you've pointed out in previous posts but they took several steps backward with the players and the general public with the roll off issues at the various events. Hopefully, there have been some design changes for the 7' version to be used at the BCA Nationals. It will be interesting to hear the player feedback.
 
To be honest Trent, I don't think I need to play on one to give an opinion. As it stands now, the table is not designed to endure the purpose for which it was built: frequent setup and teardown for tournament play. I'm certain it is a fine table once it is setup properly and is not moved but that's not the intended purpose. When you have elite professional players forfeiting matches because of table conditions, that says all you need to know. I hope they are successful for all the reasons you've pointed out in previous posts but they took several steps backward with the players and the general public with the roll off issues at the various events. Hopefully, there have been some design changes for the 7' version to be used at the BCA Nationals. It will be interesting to hear the player feedback.
To each their own. I understand what you are saying. No offense, but, the tournament conditions have nothing to do with you. I understand how that could make people upset, but, that situation does not apply to you or most people.

It was their tour, not like they were hired by someone else and failed their customer. They publicly apologized and obviously are working on the problems. In fact, I was actually very, very satisfied with how they handled the bad situation and did not try to ignore it. Diamond had TONS of problems with their tables all through out the 90's, so its not like this has not happened in the past. Note: they were mass producing tables that had known flaws and selling them, so Predator is not guilty of this part. Thats progress IMO. Anyone buying a Predator table for their home is not going to experience these issues.

My question has nothing to do with these issues. The statement stands: How many people with very negative opinions about the Predator table, have actually played on one?? Or set one up / worked on one???

TFT
 
I've never played on one or seen it. But knowing the quality of predator stuff, I'm pretty sure it's top notch. I personally would like to see the thing before i would purchase myself.

But their are a lot of haters for no reason on certain products
 
To each their own. I understand what you are saying. No offense, but, the tournament conditions have nothing to do with you. I understand how that could make people upset, but, that situation does not apply to you or most people.
True, I'm not a target customer but you are kidding yourself if you think potential buyers weren't turned off by the inconsistent play during streamed events.
It was their tour, not like they were hired by someone else and failed their customer. They publicly apologized and obviously are working on the problems. In fact, I was actually very, very satisfied with how they handled the bad situation and did not try to ignore it. Diamond had TONS of problems with their tables all through out the 90's, so its not like this has not happened in the past. Note: they were mass producing tables that had known flaws and selling them, so Predator is not guilty of this part. Thats progress IMO. Anyone buying a Predator table for their home is not going to experience these issues.
True, it was/is their tour but they did fail their customers: professional players who payed an entry fee under the auspice of professional tournament conditions which they did not receive. At this point, we cannot speak to a Predator home table because, as far as I know, it isn't for sale to the general public yet. All we have to go by is what we've witnessed during streamed events or if you live in the Sacramento area and can visit Oscar's room. At the end of the day, the table was designed, engineered and intended to be quickly carted and set up for multiple professional tournaments. They failed at this regardless if they owned it or not. I'm sure if the table was setup by a qualified mechanic in a commercial environment or a home environment with the intent of not moving it, it would play just fine. Selling to this market was a by product of a successful rollout in their events. A race on Sunday, sell on Monday mentality if you will.
My question has nothing to do with these issues. The statement stands: How many people with very negative opinions about the Predator table, have actually played on one?? Or set one up / worked on one???

TFT
This is a bit of a loaded question. If the table isn't available the only mechanics that have experience working on them would be the folks setting them up for the Predator events and Ernesto. As such, the only players that have played on one would be those that participated in said events and a handful of patrons of Hard Times Sacramento. Jayson Shaw played on one and he forfeited a match. Other professional players that played on one had less than favorable things to say about it. The table at Oscar's place may play lights out.

Again, I hope they are wildly successful and hope they have overcome the issues they had. Time will tell. At the end of the day, competition is good for the consumer.
 
Last edited:
Predator is a marketing company with mediocre products sold at exorbitant prices.

As for opinions on the table, they don't need to be based on playing or working on them. They put on a tournament with tables that caused competitors to drop out. They failed on their implicit promise to deliver a successful tourney.
 
I've never played on one or seen it. But knowing the quality of predator stuff, I'm pretty sure it's top notch. I personally would like to see the thing before i would purchase myself.

But their are a lot of haters for no reason on certain products
I have not yet either.
 
Predator is a marketing company with mediocre products sold at exorbitant prices.

As for opinions on the table, they don't need to be based on playing or working on them. They put on a tournament with tables that caused competitors to drop out. They failed on their implicit promise to deliver a successful tourney.
There was no "intent" of not delivering. That makes a huge difference. They admitted fault and vowed to fix the issues.
this as nothing to do with residential customers, the tables wont be moved around like they are for a tournament.

TFT
 
There was no "intent" of not delivering. That makes a huge difference. They admitted fault and vowed to fix the issues.
this as nothing to do with residential customers, the tables wont be moved around like they are for a tournament.

TFT

They also didn't do due diligence in testing the product. Intent can this be argued.

A failure to plan is a plan for failure.
 
Played on a SAM yrs ago. Played ok. Same table with different cosmetics. Over the yrs i've heard from multiple mechanics what a major pia they are to set-up/service. If i never see another SAM product i'll be just fine.
 
They also didn't do due diligence in testing the product. Intent can this be argued.

A failure to plan is a plan for failure.
Not true, they were testing it on their own tour... Like I said, this is not he first time this happened. Diamond also had problems with the red labels for over a decade. There were many complaints about the Rasson table in the beginning and look at them now, used in some of the biggest tournaments in the world. The Rasson Ox is an excellent pol table: I researched them for a long time, have played on one and inspected it. Predator is also a part of Matchroom as well. I think that relationship shows TRUST between the biggest pool promoter in the world and the newest table brand out there. It will all sort out. There is a tournament this month

PREDATOR CANADA WOMEN’S OPEN.​

and next month:

SEYBERTS MICHIGAN OPEN​

We shall see how they perform! In fact, I am likely to go to the Michigan event!

They know everyone is watching. I wish them well on all their future events.

TFT
 
Not true, they were testing it on their own tour... Like I said, this is not he first time this happened. Diamond also had problems with the red labels for over a decade. There were many complaints about the Rasson table in the beginning and look at them now, used in some of the biggest tournaments in the world. The Rasson Ox is an excellent pol table: I researched them for a long time, have played on one and inspected it. Predator is also a part of Matchroom as well. I think that relationship shows TRUST between the biggest pool promoter in the world and the newest table brand out there. It will all sort out. There is a tournament this month

PREDATOR CANADA WOMEN’S OPEN.​

and next month:

SEYBERTS MICHIGAN OPEN​

We shall see how they perform! In fact, I am likely to go to the Michigan event!

They know everyone is watching. I wish them well on all their future events.

TFT

So... Nobody was allowed to view this tourney? The results weren't reported? People didn't make plans for this tourney?

Nothing happens in a vacuum. Predator wasn't ready with their product and delivered a substandard experience. Why should anyone ever trust them?

As for diamond tables, I hate them based on playing on them.
 
So... Nobody was allowed to view this tourney? The results weren't reported? People didn't make plans for this tourney?

Nothing happens in a vacuum. Predator wasn't ready with their product and delivered a substandard experience. Why should anyone ever trust them?

As for diamond tables, I hate them based on playing on them.
You are being a bit harsh, I am done going back and forth with you. You are way off topic: you have not played on one or worked on one, That is the topic at hand. You have stated your opinion. I am a Brunswick guy myself, I hope they get back in the game. I just like seeing new things happening and the possibilities of pool turning into a REAL and organized sport. I dont sell their products.

TFT
 
Hey Trent, one thing we can objectively say - threads like this one sure ain’t helping them out!

My insignificant subjective opinion - they are butt ugly, totally souless design, like most Predator products IMO. Which actually is a nod to their consistency, so there is that. Rassons on the other hand, IMO do have a nice & original appearance. For what its worth Diamond ProAms look totally uninspiring to me also, but they have the Pro version which to many of us has attractive lines akin to the GC.

Just having fun! Hope they sort their issues out, I’m all for more competition and max choices for us consumers.

✌️
 
Last edited:
You are being a bit harsh, I am done going back and forth with you. You are way off topic: you have not played on one or worked on one, That is the topic at hand. You have stated your opinion. I am a Brunswick guy myself, I hope they get back in the game. I just like seeing new things happening and the possibilities of pool turning into a REAL and organized sport. I dont sell their products.

TFT
Whether you like RKC or not his experiences of jacking with SAM tables are real. He got to the point where he wouldn't even touch one. I've only seen one opened up and it looked like a pandora's box of nuts/bolts/washers. The mechanic doing the work said once he got it set-up he was DONE and not to call him again. They play ok if set right, same as any table. Getting them that way can be a nightmare.
 
Last edited:
This room was in KC-area 20+yrs ago.
I respect your opinion and also RKC's knowledge(even though I do not associate with him anymore) But, 20 year old data means very little to me. Businesses learn and grow. I know this because I know where I started 10 years ago and how much I have learned and grown. Having Predator asking for specifics based on the current standards: means change. They must have CSI, Seyberts and Matchroom convinced they can come forth with a good product. That and the HOPE for change enough for me . Like I said, I aint making no scratch $$$ off any of this. I am a player and hopeful for change in our industry and our game to become a legit sport.

TFT
 
I respect your opinion and also RKC's knowledge(even though I do not associate with him anymore) But, 20 year old data means very little to me. Businesses learn and grow. I know this because I know where I started 10 years ago and how much I have learned and grown. Having Predator asking for specifics based on the current standards: means change. They must have CSI, Seyberts and Matchroom convinced they can come forth with a good product. That and the HOPE for change enough for me . Like I said, I aint making no scratch $$$ off any of this. I am a player and hopeful for change in our industry and our game to become a legit sport.

TFT
Talk to Ernesto D. The Pred's are nothing but Ksteels with different trim. Internals are same as the SAM KSteel table. A friend that lives in Az played the Pred event out there. He told me none of the tables played alike. TONS of complaints from plenty of TOP players. Change don't mean s^&t if its a inferior product being rammed down your throat. Ever wonder why Pred went with SAM? Just my guess here but it likely had to do with two things: price of course and availability. SAM tables aren't a household name and they were able to deliver on time. I doubt i'll ever hit a ball on one and for that i'm grateful.
 
Back
Top