bpeacock's latest activity
-
Assuming the balls were frozen there was absolutely nothing wrong with that shot! -
The wording is slightly awkward. You are required to contact an object ball on the shot. Normally, that is when the cue ball comes into...
-
As I wrote above, Pongers called the ref over to inspect the balls and the ref said something after inspection. If he said “frozen” or...
-
It was a normal, although powerful stroke. You also don't understand what a push shot is within the rules.
-
Sadly and surprisingly, you have no idea what the rules are. You might try reading them some time. Here is a brief exerpt: However, if...
-
Not exactly. The call was made by another ref. Marcel was called over afterwards and the call stood. What I don’t know is if he agreed...
-
Marcel again? What a shocker that he got it wrong.
-
WPA 3-7: DOUBLE HIT / FROZEN BALLS If the cue-ball is touching an object-ball at the start of the shot, it is legal to shoot...
-
This just isn’t the rule and shows that is you who doesn’t understand frozen ball principles. WPA rule 3.7 is very clear on this IMO.
-
Pongers called the ref over to inspect the balls and the ref said something after inspection. If he said “frozen” or “touching” then the...
-
Nah. That's not the way the balls work when they are frozen. No way for the cue ball to back up.
-
I believe the announcers minds were poisoned by long exposure to the rules of snooker, and even worse, the rules of English 8-ball. At...
-
The announcers were clueless IMO. No idea that it’s legal to shoot into frozen balls.
-
bpeacock replied to the thread Push shot foul?.Also, the announcers clearly thought it was a foul...
-
bpeacock replied to the thread Push shot foul?.What could the ref have seen to call it a foul?
