Recent content by hundreder

Indeed. 3 scratches on the break in the semies were just too much. So unlucky.. Every comeback attempt was interupted by a scratch on a break :( But! He is here to stay! We'll see him!

Some say skids while using Masters caused them loose money.. Heard some guy speaking about that recently, so he switched to MrV. Havent seen the guy before..

Belgrade, Serbia!

You didn't get it..

I bought new cue thinking it would make my game better. After a while I figured it has nothing to do with the cue. Its the table..

Its funny that when you compare us and eu, everything is waaaaay oversized in us, except pool tables :D

On the prize money topic, ask tennis players how's it going for them..

Rodney Morris talking exactly about this

I have a feeling noone answered the op question. With same meximum up contact point, will the beter effect be made if tip goes up (or paralel) or down to the cloth. Thats how I understood the question

Thats all there is..

Found this on FB, Window's open page. Anyone knows bit more?

Thank you. I whatched and I changed my perception as slowmo video made me understand the physics. Cue didnt have prolongued contact nor double hit. When balls are frozen they behave as one object so they move together. So, not a foul.

Thing is you can play this shot legal way and ilegal way with both ways doing whats described in 3.7. This one was ilegal.

I still dont understand how 2nd paragraph of 3.7 defines this shot as a legal shot. This is 3.8 as there is no way that the cueball would move forward without extended contact. Foul. Two fouls. Push shot, which converted to double hit as cue ball advanced. Imagine cueball was hit by a...