Recent content by nicksaint26

There is really big money in some of these events that is why they require a minimum robustness. They don’t want some sandbagger coming in and robbing their tournament . Now for smaller tournaments I get your point. The thing is not everyone is honest like you. There was a 600 and under event...

The reason the up and comers play is to play against the pros imo. If they were in a separate bracket my guess is many wouldn’t play.

No one for $800. There you go

TTT

I see reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

Probably the same guys that watch him practice in awe (supposedly)

I’m still trying to understand how this is better than alternate break? Makes no sense to me as a player or a fan.

Hopefully with a shot clock lol

In a podcast with Gorst before the match he said he wanted a 3rd match win or lose. He said if he won he wanted another to settle it and if he lost he was gonna keep chasing him. I’m sure they will play again.

I hear what you're saying but this break twice then alternate is beyond dumb imo. I just don't get it. There is no need to add another option to your list. Let’s confuse new viewers even more as the game continues to grow.

For who? It sucks as a viewer imo as it's too confusing especially if you join mid match. Why do they keep trying to reinvent the wheel? Winner breaks or alternate break is fine. What's the point of this? The Sanjin and Lechner match was 9-9 and Lechner never saw the table again going to 11. If...

I watched some but the breaking rules are stupid. Each player breaks twice in a row no matter who wins. Who comes up with this crap?

I just woke up and replied before I finished reading the thread. Thought Id be behind a few people lol

I'll take this

40-22 Fedor after day 1