Anybody else then. Take the contact lines from an open rack of balls. Assign the fractions to all. What you got; by tomorrow.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
I come from the technique equals competence school - I'm not a virtuoso at anything but by that token so much the more. You need functional detail in anything you do. You make notes of what number is where, right?
I get the accomplished master of the universe vibe but seriously, how high up the...
Ask an aiming question... :ROFLMAO:
There's a reason for the anal specificity though - consistency. It's not even a stretch to narrow it down from a buncha bawlls to the one functional alignment.
The effect is built into the shot. It's probably impossible without the masse stroke. There's a shot I've not seen that supposedly has the CB pulling above the side pocket before contact. Also big on the "no way" factor.
Those two form the only alignment in a simple, to the pocket, shot. You put two identical objects in identical orientations with some natural holographic filtering and adjustment.
The only thing getting complicated is the wordage.
Not tall enough. I do switch though. Half the stuff is ducks anyway - just on the wrong side. Even one handed will do - well that's a couple ticks into reckless lol...