Moe Szyslak
Active member
Waiting for the posts three years down the line, "I drank the Koolaid on wood and now I'm back to carbon fiber..."
I'm all about value vs cost as well. So much so that I've never even ventured into the realm of low deflection shafts. I get the traditionalist angle, and the new tech CF angles as well. But my angle is that I can't seem to be burdened enough to care much either way, certainly not enough to make me pay more. Other than the taper, I had my cue built purely for the fun and artistry of it (sure, I had the cue maker do his thing with balance point etc, but that's his jam, not mine). The build process was fun too (Kelly with MVP is great). I do think my cue plays great. But I think a lot of cues play great too. Sure, some are pieces of lumber to be burned, I get that. But the spectrum of cues with which one can play great with is very forgiving, IMHO.I'll never own CF... No hate. Just don't see the value vs cost.
That said, I'd never buy a solid maple either. The drilled out design of the wx900 checks all the boxes for me.
the best looking CF cues that I have seen have been all CF
Actually, in the long run, a CF shaft is cheaper.I'm all about value vs cost as well. So much so that I've never even ventured into the realm of low deflection shafts. I get the traditionalist angle, and the new tech CF angles as well. But my angle is that I can't seem to be burdened enough to care much either way, certainly not enough to make me pay more. Other than the taper, I had my cue built purely for the fun and artistry of it (sure, I had the cue maker do his thing with balance point etc, but that's his jam, not mine). The build process was fun too (Kelly with MVP is great). I do think my cue plays great. But I think a lot of cues play great too. Sure, some are pieces of lumber to be burned, I get that. But the spectrum of cues with which one can play great with is very forgiving, IMHO.
For what it's worth, the best looking CF cues that I have seen have been all CF. The mix and match combo is not aethetically pleaseing IMHO, but it really matters none to the game.
When revo made its appearance they were close to 500. A joss maple was around 125. Of course now maple cues cost more but revo has stayed the sameActually, in the long run, a CF shaft is cheaper.
No need for maintenance products, no need to refinish for dings, no need to a new one when it warps.
Just wipe it down and continue shooting.
So if you are in the market for a cue or shaft, a $400 CF is cheaper than a $125 wood and where do you get a really good wooden shaft for $125?
I still like it that my friend has 40 year old blanks and I'm trying to convince him to let me send one of them to my cue maker.Actually, in the long run, a CF shaft is cheaper.
No need for maintenance products, no need to refinish for dings, no need to a new one when it warps.
Just wipe it down and continue shooting.
So if you are in the market for a cue or shaft, a $400 CF is cheaper than a $125 wood and where do you get a really good wooden shaft for $125?
Nothing feels better then the standard (non laminated) wood shaft that was made with the cue.
...but that doesnt mean nothing plays better.
This.Nothing feels better then the standard (non laminated) wood shaft that was made with the cue.
...but that doesnt mean nothing plays better.
Best feeling cue I have ever played with was my Timmy Scruggs. Steel joint piloted 5/16 14. Standard shafts with ivory ferrules. Ooof... still pull it off the wall and hit balls with it on occasion...Agree with this.
Best feeling cue I've ever played with is probably my South West Satin. The feel and feedback from that cue is amazing, I now "get" the South West thing and why they are so popular. But I also have been playing with carbon shafts lately and they do just make the game easier. Long shots with spin make the difference very noticeable.
I know if I play enough with the SW or any wood shafter cue I could mostly adapt, I've been there before, but I think the carbon shaft gives a greater margin for error on a lot of shots and that's a hard performance benefit to give up. But I'd be lying if I said I didn't feel the pull to play with wood shafts a lot....my heart wants to, my head knows I should stick with the performance of carbon because I do play better with them.
LOLDeflects like a MFer, but feels awesome LOL.
I'm using a CF shaft without a glove. A glove is not required.What is souring my enjoyment of my cf shaft is having to use a glove. It takes away the feel of the shot for me. No slickening coating on the shaft lasts more than 30 mins or so of use, and ive tried many.
This is the way.I only use wood shafts - they just feel more natural in so many ways - I don’t want to be perfect bc of my equipment - I seek perfection because I earned it respecting tradition . Some choices in life just should not be technology driven - I like it that way!
Deflects like a MFer, but feels awesome LOL.
I get that, I do, and I have some nice shafts with some of my cues that are not really in use.I still like it that my friend has 40 year old blanks and I'm trying to convince him to let me send one of them to my cue maker.
The shaft would be as old as me. It's the romanticism I guess.
Buying a Johnny come lately synthetic shaft doesn't sound as cool.