WTB Southwest Cues-Fancy Woods

If your buying as an investment beware, unless it’s a ten year plan. Cue collectors and aficionados are leaving daily and not being replaced. Honestly I’d recommend anyone w a collection to sell now, if they didn’t have a passion for ownership.
 
If your buying as an investment beware, unless it’s a ten year plan. Cue collectors and aficionados are leaving daily and not being replaced. Honestly I’d recommend anyone w a collection to sell now, if they didn’t have a passion for ownership.
To be honest, the value of a custom cue tends to increase over time for a few reasons.

First, custom cue makers aren’t getting any younger. As their careers progress and fewer of their cues become available, the value of their work often increases, especially for well-known makers.


Second, the cost of materials continues to rise. Rare woods such as burl, tulipwood, and Brazilian rosewood are becoming increasingly expensive and harder to source. The same applies to other premium materials that are limited in availability such as Ivory.

Generally speaking, a quality custom cue can appreciate around 3–4% per year, although some highly sought-after makers can increase much more than that. For example, a Gus Szamboti from 1991 may have originally sold for around $1,100, while today, a comparable cue could be worth around $7,500.


So, I wouldn’t look at a custom cue as a 10-year investment or a way to make quick money. It’s more of a long-term investment that can hold or increase its value over time, especially if you buy the right cue from the right maker and take good care of it.
 
1995 Franklin sw

Coco/ebony
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5292.jpeg
    IMG_5292.jpeg
    283.5 KB · Views: 131
  • IMG_5294.jpeg
    IMG_5294.jpeg
    182.1 KB · Views: 120
2018
 

Attachments

  • 20260814_150738.jpg
    20260814_150738.jpg
    362.6 KB · Views: 71
  • 20260814_150831.jpg
    20260814_150831.jpg
    222.6 KB · Views: 67
  • 20260814_150825.jpg
    20260814_150825.jpg
    212.9 KB · Views: 62
  • 20260814_150847.jpg
    20260814_150847.jpg
    306.4 KB · Views: 76
  • 20260814_150742.jpg
    20260814_150742.jpg
    219 KB · Views: 73
  • 20260814_150821.jpg
    20260814_150821.jpg
    205.7 KB · Views: 65
  • 20260814_150815.jpg
    20260814_150815.jpg
    209.3 KB · Views: 62
  • 20260814_150735.jpg
    20260814_150735.jpg
    298.5 KB · Views: 78
To be honest, the value of a custom cue tends to increase over time for a few reasons.

First, custom cue makers aren’t getting any younger. As their careers progress and fewer of their cues become available, the value of their work often increases, especially for well-known makers.


Second, the cost of materials continues to rise. Rare woods such as burl, tulipwood, and Brazilian rosewood are becoming increasingly expensive and harder to source. The same applies to other premium materials that are limited in availability such as Ivory.

Generally speaking, a quality custom cue can appreciate around 3–4% per year, although some highly sought-after makers can increase much more than that. For example, a Gus Szamboti from 1991 may have originally sold for around $1,100, while today, a comparable cue could be worth around $7,500.


So, I wouldn’t look at a custom cue as a 10-year investment or a way to make quick money. It’s more of a long-term investment that can hold or increase its value over time, especially if you buy the right cue from the right maker and take good care of it.

People (not specifically @KenneyTran, if at all) need to be careful about conflating increases in price with increases in value. A quality custom cue that appreciates in price by 3-4% per year is barely outpacing inflation; its value is not increasing much.

The Gus Szamboti cue example that cost $1100 in 1991 cost about $2700 in 2026 US dollars. While its (hypothetical) price increased by over 580%, its value only increased by about 180%. It would have been a fantastic store of value, but not a very good investment. The same $1100 invested into a S&P index fund in 1991 would be worth over $50,000 today. The actual increase in value (i.e., inflation adjusted) would be over 1750%.

As a general rule, collectibles outside of art and Rolexes (and often those too) are poor investments.

Edit: My apologies to @Mgunter for posting this in their Wanted thread.
 
Last edited:
People (not specifically @KenneyTran, if at all) need to be careful about conflating increases in price with increases in value. A quality custom cue that appreciates in price by 3-4% per year is barely outpacing inflation; its value is not increasing much.

The Gus Szamboti cue example that cost $1100 in 1991 cost about $2700 in 2026 US dollars. While its (hypothetical) price increased by over 580%, its value only increased by about 180%. It would have been a fantastic store of value, but not a very good investment. The same $1100 invested into a S&P index fund in 1991 would be worth over $50,000 today. The actual increase in value (i.e., inflation adjusted) would be over 1750%.

As a general rule, collectibles outside of art and Rolexes (and often those too) are poor investments.

Edit: My apologies to @Mgunter for posting this in their Wanted thread.
I don’t necessarily have the collection as an investment. Granted I’d hate to lose money. It I just buy because I like collecting and they hold a special place with me and when I’m playing with one takes me back 30 years when life was simpler. Some great memories from back then. Happy to be playing again after being off the table for 30 years. Shit goes downhill quick 😂

With regards to your comment about Rolexes, a majority of them will be money in the bank going forward if for no other reason than Rolex issues a retail price increase at least once a year. I know these things because it’s actually the business I’m in 😊 are there some dogs? I had to buy this dog and take a loss to get 2 other pieces that made it back plus about $10k. But as a whole you’re money is safe in Rolex.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7068.jpeg
    IMG_7068.jpeg
    284.7 KB · Views: 45
One on Far right
2. 13.1mm Shafts
 

Attachments

  • 20260904_181451.jpg
    20260904_181451.jpg
    352.9 KB · Views: 42
  • 20260904_181500.jpg
    20260904_181500.jpg
    289 KB · Views: 47
  • 20260904_181448.jpg
    20260904_181448.jpg
    337.5 KB · Views: 50
  • 20260904_181457.jpg
    20260904_181457.jpg
    260.3 KB · Views: 43
  • 20260904_181513.jpg
    20260904_181513.jpg
    219.5 KB · Views: 46
  • 20260904_181517.jpg
    20260904_181517.jpg
    205.9 KB · Views: 36
  • 20260904_181505.jpg
    20260904_181505.jpg
    257.6 KB · Views: 38
  • 20260904_181454.jpg
    20260904_181454.jpg
    301.8 KB · Views: 40
Back
Top