9-ball rack

  • Thread starter Thread starter CueHunter
  • Start date Start date
C

CueHunter

Guest
A question for you guys. When racking for your opponent in 9-ball, is there a certain order that you put the balls that make it more difficult for him/her to run out? I usually just put the 1 in the front and 9 in the center and not worry about the rest. Some people tell me there is an order to put them in that makes it harder anyway. Thanks.
 
Usually, if it is someone I know can run out, I'll make sure the 3 is up front with the 1 and the 2 is at the rear. That's about the extent of my rack planning.
 
9 ball rack...

1
3 5
6 9 7
2 4
8

That's what I read one time in Billiards Digest and also from a couple Instructors. I seems to work well for me (when they pocket something), because 90% of the breaks the player has to go up/down table to the next shot.

Zim
 
Zims Rack said:
1
3 5
6 9 7
2 4
8

That's what I read one time in Billiards Digest and also from a couple Instructors. I seems to work well for me (when they pocket something), because 90% of the breaks the player has to go up/down table to the next shot.

Zim

A friend of mine also swears by exactly this same rack. I've not found it to cause any more "up/down" play than other racks. The idea is that the 2 goes up table and the 3 stays by the foot, but if you break from the side (break from the side opposite the 3), you can also cause the 3 to come up table. Since the 4 will be coming up table (it's in the next to the last row), the supposed advantage gained by this rack is nullified.

BTW, in a tournament, if I see a player rack the balls the same way twice in a row, I'll ask for a re-rack. Other than the 1 and 9, the rules specify a "random" order....

-djb
 
1
83
496
72
5


Was told once that it makes it harder to run out.
To make it easier you switch the 7 and the 3.

Don't know if it really works, but I always rack that way. I'm a little obsessive compulsive though, so it just doesn't look right if I don't
 
Zims Rack said:
1
3 5
6 9 7
2 4
8

That's what I read one time in Billiards Digest and also from a couple Instructors. I seems to work well for me (when they pocket something), because 90% of the breaks the player has to go up/down table to the next shot.

Zim
hey zim,
that is the same rack i always use, but mirrored over :), it just habit, by now, i think...

i've played the ghost racking random, and racking that way, and more times than not, the
1
53
796
42
8
makes a harder runout... JMHO

Thanks

Jon
 
The Florida Pro Tour allows players to rack their own with the stipulation that the 3 is above the 9 and the 2 alongside or below the 9.

In Sigel's video he recommends the 3 above and the 2 below the 9. With them both being on the opposite side the person is breaking from. With the hope that the 1 and 3 go up table and the 2 stays down table near the rail.

Then if the person is making the 1 on the break he switches the 2 and 3.

And of course if there is a spot ball it goes in row 2.

In practice I always rack 1 - 2,3 - 4,9,5 - 6,7 - 8
Then after the break I can always tell which ball went where.

But does it all matter? Probably not too much because running out is the exception among the players in the tournaments here.

Jake
 
Back
Top