APA Ranking System / % of players in each ranking

Getting back into a pool league. Was curious to see if anyone knows the percentage of players ranked per skill level. How many players are ranked 1 percentabe wise, how many are ranked a 2 and so forth through a 7 ranking in 8-ball and a 1-9 ranking in 9-ball. Thank you.
 
I remember seeing a breakdown a few years ago, not sure of it was official or not. Perhaps it was here, and APAOperator provided it...

4,5,3,2,6,7,1,8,9 would be my guess, if memory serves.
 
That would be my guess too. Wondering what the percentage breakdown would be, for example:

Ranked / 8-Ball
4=30%
5=25%
3=20%
2=15%
6=5%
7=3%
1=2%
 
Getting back into a pool league. Was curious to see if anyone knows the percentage of players ranked per skill level. How many players are ranked 1 percentabe wise, how many are ranked a 2 and so forth through a 7 ranking in 8-ball and a 1-9 ranking in 9-ball. Thank you.
You can get the info on your region when you log in. Hit "view all divisions", and you have every player in your region by team with skill level.
 
It's always been that way. As far as I can remember anyway. A 2 used to be reserved for females. Male players could never go below a 3. That has apparently changed in the recent past. But as soon a a 2 obtains a winning percentage, they automatically become a 3
 
How come there are no 1 rankings in 8-ball?

And why are there 1, 8, and 9 rankings in 9-ball?
It's a historical thing. At first, when there was just 8-Ball, it was a race to your handicap and it was decided that 7 was the most anyone should have to win and 2 the fewest. Later the races were all shortened to shorten the league night. Over the years there was discussion of handicaps higher than 7, but it was decided that there were too few of them to create extra skill level bands for the high end. It was 8-Ball, and if you pit two 7's, either one can win, so there's really no need to go higher in 8-Ball anyway. When 9-Ball came around, there were no such "race to handicap" issues (i.e., a table was needed from the start), so 1-9 (matching the balls) was chosen. And in 9-Ball, there is a difference at the high end. A player who is a 7/9 and plays a 7/7 will lose the 8-Ball match much more often than the 9-Ball match.
 
When I was playing APA I used the app to see how many 7s were playing. It was approximately 8% of active players in the division.

At the in house league I play in its mostly older guys that were APA 7s when they played.

With my own APA experience as a 7, the difficulty in posting and the math required to be on a team to be able to play every week, leads met to believe most players opt out of APA if there are other options once that skill level is reached.
 
A player who is a 7/9 and plays a 7/7 will lose the 8-Ball match much more often than the 9-Ball match.
What is your reasoning? The 7/9 is an overall better players, so why wouldn’t he win more playing 8-ball, since the lesser player has to win the same amount of games.
 
What is your reasoning? The 7/9 is an overall better players, so why wouldn’t he win more playing 8-ball, since the lesser player has to win the same amount of games.
Because the 7/7 is still good enough to run out almost as often in 8-Ball but not nearly as often in 9-Ball, so the mistakes made by the 7/9 in 8-Ball are more costly. That and experience running both 8-Ball and 9-Ball tournaments for these players.
 
“ It was 8-Ball, and if you pit two 7's, either one can win”. Typical LO - I have seen Grand Canyon wide differences between 7s in my area APA. There are SL 7s around here that win National tournaments!!!!!!!! There are SL 7s that lose 3 to 0 against good 5s. More and more 5s and 6s were raised to 7s hoping to break up teams so they would recruit more players. If a SL7 is the highest rating in APA 8 ball, then there should be just a small number of them, based on who plays APA in a given area. A top rated player in my area told me that 95% of SL 7s cannot beat the top 5% of SL7s in this area. How is this fair?
 
There are many more 7s in any given area than those that play in A P A since each team is effectively capped at 1.

Once that level is attained you either need to sandbag back down or play elsewhere
 
Because the 7/7 is still good enough to run out almost as often in 8-Ball but not nearly as often in 9-Ball, so the mistakes made by the 7/9 in 8-Ball are more costly. That and experience running both 8-Ball and 9-Ball tournaments for these players.
9s can also grab a quick 20+ points off a single ball in hand if they're shooting well. They'll run out that rack and then have a decent chance of running out the next, especially on a bar box. So one foul by the 7/7 can quickly erase their handicap advantage.
 
What is your reasoning? The 7/9 is an overall better players, so why wouldn’t he win more playing 8-ball, since the lesser player has to win the same amount of games.
He just means the skill gap shows up more in 9ball than in 8b so the more skilled player loses more often in 8b than 9b, not loses more often than the weaker player. This has been my experience as well playing some 7s recently. One guy in particular (strong 6, weak 7 in a big city) plays me close in 8b every time, winning 1/3 of our matches so far but could easily be up 2-1 or 3-0 if he got an extra roll here or there (I roll like Albin Ouschan). But in 9b, he is 0/3 and the races aren't close.
 
Back
Top