Side-Pocket
New member
Following up on my earlier posts about Aramith balls, I was wondering what others thought about the Continental and the Crown seta of Aramith balls. I believe the Continental is an earlier set than the Crown, but both are on the lower end of their series of balls. Even though they may be on the low end, are they still better than other standard standard brand balls. I'm also wondering about their quality characteristics for long term play. My interest comes from loving the history of everything billiards including the equipment and the billiard ball manufacturers, especially Aramith, is something I'm trying to understand.