Billiard Aim Trainer

Curdog

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I realize the subject of aiming is always controversial in these quarters. Wanted to see if anyone had any experience with the BAT, recently being marketed with Allison Fisher's support. Relates back to "most" cut shots being 3/4, 1/2, or 1/4 ball hits. Obviously this won't cover all shots.
Any comments on the product or the concept?
 
Curdog said:
I realize the subject of aiming is always controversial in these quarters. Wanted to see if anyone had any experience with the BAT, recently being marketed with Allison Fisher's support. Relates back to "most" cut shots being 3/4, 1/2, or 1/4 ball hits. Obviously this won't cover all shots.
Any comments on the product or the concept?


i have a comment which will go something like this---many years ago there was a man named hal houle--houle as in pool he used to say!
he posted on rsb to the dismay of most- an aiming system - boasting of 6 angles . he was beat to death, hung out to dry, and CRITIZED by all the nay sayers, who could not understand what he could possibly be talking about. he offered free advice on the system, a lonely, ill,. older gentleman, who had been one of the old time road players from days gone bye. he had spent time on the road with ralph greenleaf and became the student of the mentor.
he now was ill and bedridden most of ther time, and tried to share his knowledge with others through the use of the "new invention" called a computer that he was just starting to realize would open up the world to him again from his bed.
years went bye, those of us that "believed" in hal became known as the "HOULIGANS".
Hal never asked a player for a dime , but instead , payed plenty of dimes calling the players that wanted to learn and would instruct them over the phone as to how to use this system.
myself was one of the first "houligans" almost 12 years ago. before rsb and az and all the rest i came in contact with hal quite by coincidence. i in fact believe that i introduced hal to rsb and az.
being ill myself at the time and with a 9 foot big G in my home hal and i became the best of phone friends and the lessons weekly long distance from california to florida went on for years. most all of them at hals expense. we would spend 14 asnd 15 hours a week or more on the phone.
my husbsand started to get concerned, but afer i introduced him to hal all was fine.
FINALLY hal drove across country and came to visit the student he had never meet,. but had spent hundreds of hours with on the phone.
the STICK systems you see just had to be taught in person, as no one could understand them over the phone.
he was determined i should learn all of his systems. hal stayed with my husband and i for 6 weeks. we had a hell of a good time. becky from titusville came over for lessons and we drove to tampa to meet with smorg.
hal drove across county at considerable risk to his health and suffered a great deal of pain during the trip. along the way he stopped in /on several rsb believers that wanted to meet him. and so became the "legend of hal houle".

since that time, when all was saying their are no systems but the ghost ball---looking at angles is far out and how could anyone do that? we now have had books showing up all of a sudden by american authors showing ball angles and degrees as hal had always referred to in the forums.
out came all sorts of new ways to try to teach this system,. by other people, some of them getting information from hal and some not , but most of them all had talked to hal by now.
the material must have been getting scarce for new books and new marketing to sell as all of a sudden there is plenty on the market in relationship to teaching angles and degrees for playing pool.
a recognized bca instructor teaches hals systems in his school and the players of today can all thank hal houle for his contribution to the sport of pool.
had he not fought the "system" to get his message out, how long would it have been before anyone was teaching or writing about the angles and degrees ? no one wanted any part of listening to it even 8 years ago.
refer to the forums in rsb way back when 8 years ago and more and see the blasts from the past against the hal houle method .
my how time changes!
my husband and i have been gests at hal and his wifes home in california several times and we continue to exchange phone calls.
hal has now moved to pennsylvania to be closer to his sons family, and hal and his wife will be moving into their new home that is being built soon. the largest room in the house is to be hals POOL ROOM COMPLETE WITH A NEW DIAMOND PRO TABLE WHICH I AM ORDERING FOR HIM WHEN THEY ARE READY.

in closing , the "BAT" is another one of those inventions to try to teach a method that is really came from hal houle teaching in one respect or another.
as an avid student of hals, that has the best understanding of all his systems and the thought behind them and the method of teaching them, i
can honestly say that "joe tucker" has come up with the best way to teach this system and it shows the exact same thing that hal always told me" the angles change every diamond or so".

i had the pleasure of meeting joe in orlando 2 years ago and visiting with him on his training materials. his material is very well presented and teaches the angles in a wonderful manner. i wish i had them in the beginning along with my phone lessons from hal as my improvement would have been much quicker.
i currently have been re-reviewing joes material ,and playing around with it on the big G as illness has prevented me again from playing for almost a year. i am going to use joes material to refresh my shot making on hals systems.
i guess this is a little more than you asked for--but history is always good!
if you want hals phone you may email me for it and get first hand the system.

ljmoss
founding member of the spirit tour of fl
bca league operator
diamond pool table sales
 
Aiming isn't that hard. I agree with the concept Hal put forth that there are only 6 angles in pool, 12 if you look at forward and backward cuts, but they still have the same basic aiming points just on the other side of the ball.

Everyone is so concerned about aiming systems when they should be focusing on alignement more than anything else. What good is knowing where to hit the ball when you can't actually hit what you are aiming at?
 
Cameron Smith said:
Everyone is so concerned about aiming systems when they should be focusing on alignement more than anything else. What good is knowing where to hit the ball when you can't actually hit what you are aiming at?

Interesting chicken-egg question. What good is it to know how to hit in the wrong place? ;) Both skills are essential, of course.

The widespread interest in aiming systems suggests that most people think they have more trouble aiming than hitting where they aim.
 
Cameron Smith said:
Aiming isn't that hard. I agree with the concept Hal put forth that there are only 6 angles in pool, 12 if you look at forward and backward cuts, but they still have the same basic aiming points just on the other side of the ball.

Everyone is so concerned about aiming systems when they should be focusing on alignement more than anything else. What good is knowing where to hit the ball when you can't actually hit what you are aiming at?


and along with those many systems came the question, where should i really stand ( especially on the stick systems with the aim and pivot) and the answer was just get down at the table and you will see where you need to be. god that took forever to figure out it seemed! and i still wonder sometimes!

ljmoss
 
ljmoss said:
and along with those many systems came the question, where should i really stand ( especially on the stick systems with the aim and pivot) and the answer was just get down at the table and you will see where you need to be. god that took forever to figure out it seemed! and i still wonder sometimes!

The Four-Bank Path to Enlightenment and Correct Thinking leads one to aim first, then allow one's body to gracefully sink into the position appropriate to that aim. A falcon does not stoop before aiming. :)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dhakala
[...] most people think they have more trouble aiming than hitting where they aim.

Skeezicks said:
Not that it is actually true.

What is "it", in this case?
 
Angles/aiming

Linda,
I too enjoyed reading of your interesting experiences with Hal Houle. And I have to agree with David that many folks believe they have difficulty in aiming when it may be their mechanics or pre-stroke routine (lack of).

Is Hal's aiming system in print somewhere?

I am interested because I have recently returned to playing pool by joining a league. I am mentoring some of the beginers on the team with the pre-stroke, visualization, and stroke.
However, all I tell them about aiming is "the CB must hit the object ball at the precise angle that you determine will pocket the object ball". And then I draw a line with my cue stick of the desired path of the object ball into the pocket. This method does not compensate for the ball circumferences.

Wish I could tell them more.

Best Regards,
Hal
 
Last edited:
Excellent Hal Houle testimonial!
Here's a man willing to teach novice players aiming systems on his own time for FREE.

He was mocked and scorned for his efforts.

Thankyou,
RJ
 
I had never heard of Hal until I read about him in these forums. He sounds like a great man.

I invented the BAT and wanted to share my experience. The idea of the BAT came about when I started to think of a way to see through the cue ball and to introduce the aiming method of the 3-cut system that is popular in snooker. That what I was tought from the beginning. I had never heard of the "ghost ball" technique until I came to the US.

The beautiful thing about the BAT is that it shows the relationship between the actual contact point and how much of the ball is being cut. You can actually get a visual reference of what is happening behind the cue ball.

Although the BAT can show you how to pocket all kinds of cut shots, there is special emphasis on the 3 main cuts (1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 or 49,30 and 14 degree angles). If a player can familiarise themselves with these three cuts (angles), all others cut shots are really only slight variations. So in effect it simplifies aiming.

When I demonstrated it in Vegas, I had people that were at level 2 (APA), pocketing half ball cuts and 1/4 cuts all over the table. The BAT helps anyone to start recognizing these common cut angles as they appear in different parts of the table.

Anyway, I would love to answer any questions about the BAT and the 3-cut system it uses.

- Paul Turner
www.billiardaimtrainer.com
 
Aiming ...

Aiming has, and always has had, only 1 way to aim and make the ball, with some variance for things like english and throw. The APPROACH AND DESCRIPTION of it has taken many many forms, hence the 1,000 different aiming systems, which are all just a different way to describe the 1 way of aiming.
 
Batman said:
I had never heard of Hal until I read about him in these forums. He sounds like a great man.

I invented the BAT and wanted to share my experience. The idea of the BAT came about when I started to think of a way to see through the cue ball and to introduce the aiming method of the 3-cut system that is popular in snooker. That what I was tought from the beginning. I had never heard of the "ghost ball" technique until I came to the US.

The beautiful thing about the BAT is that it shows the relationship between the actual contact point and how much of the ball is being cut. You can actually get a visual reference of what is happening behind the cue ball.

Although the BAT can show you how to pocket all kinds of cut shots, there is special emphasis on the 3 main cuts (1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 or 49,30 and 14 degree angles). If a player can familiarise themselves with these three cuts (angles), all others cut shots are really only slight variations. So in effect it simplifies aiming.

When I demonstrated it in Vegas, I had people that were at level 2 (APA), pocketing half ball cuts and 1/4 cuts all over the table. The BAT helps anyone to start recognizing these common cut angles as they appear in different parts of the table.

Anyway, I would love to answer any questions about the BAT and the 3-cut system it uses.

- Paul Turner
www.billiardaimtrainer.com
paul,
your testimony to the angles system is like a breath of fresh air, as this is what hal houle has been trying to tell players on the forums for years.
research in rec.sport.billiards forum years ago to the last few and this forum more recent. the start was in rec. sport and of course he did post in billiard digest and others .
yes, i am aware that in england this has been more or less a chosen method for years.
i would love to communicate with you in another manner if you would care to email me at ljmoss@aol.com.
i was not intending to discredit your" bat' method of aiming, but was familiar already with the work that had been done by joe tucker.
as hal and i have contended , anyone that introduces ideas and ways to improve a players game that gets "positive results" is to be commended.
in fact, if hal was younger and in better health, he would have put together products such as you and joes to help teach this method .
he had talked with me years ago about this, but he went on with the phone call lessons and enjoyed meeting and speaking with so many people.
i should like to try your 'bat aim trainer" and would like to send one to hal who currently is offline, waiting for his new home to be finished. i think it would make him happy to see that what he has been trying to teach for years has come to life , so to speak and will live after him.of course he maintains he could die anyday, but has been telling me that for 12 years. loll i am sure he would love to speak with you at some time.
i am friends with richard brompton and sarah ellerby from england .
bca league operator
diamond table sales
founding member of spirit tour of fl
kbt of fl member
 
Cool posts... I always wondered if anyone actually developed an aiming system that could be used with some consistency. The other night, an old timer was giving me tips on aiming, and at my LPH he suggested that I look at the shadow that the ball makes on the table... Since the lights above those tables are directly above the balls, the shadows seem to be good representations of the balls edge i guess...and if I were to aim center ball hit for a spot that was inline with the center pocket, the center of the object ball, and 'one tip from the shadow' of the object ball, I would pocket all the time. Anybody else here this one?
 
Don't know which book I saw this in:

With the cue ball hit straight down the centre line, no side spin:

A ball on the head spot needs a 3/4 hit to be pocketed in a corner pocket at the foot (14 degree cut)

A ball at the centre of the table needs a half ball hit to be pocketed in the corner pocket (25 degree cut)

A ball at the foot spot needs a quarter ball hit to be pocketed in the corner pocket (45 degree cut)

From there it becomes how well you identify the angle of the shot and adjusting.
 
Back
Top