In your opinion did either one bring anything to the table? Just asking to see what the consensus is. Americans played poorly and Earl didn't help matters but when you see the Europeans and they get asked why did you play so good all of them without question say it was the captain that helped them. Maybe it was maybe it wasn't who knows but they clearly round around a "higher being" and take orders from the person. Did the captain and co captain of the american team do anything? I wasn't there and frankly didn't watch much because it was blocked at work but just wondering what thoughts are out there for this ....