Comparing laminated shaft types

kiinstructor

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I kinda think this is a personal preference issue but here goes. A friend of mine plays with a predator shaft and says that the stacked laminated shafts dont play as well. He claims that they have to be turned a certain way to hit draw shots and so on. I have hit with both and frankly dont see alot of difference. I know they dont look as nice but if your after playability and price the flat laminates are considerably cheaper. Any thoughts or experiences will be appreciated.

Thanks Mark
 
There is a difference. The term is radial consistancy. Just like a standard shaft made of a single piece of maple, the grain has a direction. Meaning that on one shot the grain may be horizontal and on the next it may be vertical. It is actually very easy to see this on a laminated shaft. The hit will be stiffer one way than the other. The shaft will flex and feel differently from shot to shot. Shafts like predator eliminate this difference. The cue will hit the same no matter how the cue is rotated. Now, I do not think that it would be the determining factor on whether you would be able to draw the ball or not, but it is a noticeable difference. There are enough variables in this game, any time you can reduce or eliminate one it would be worth it to do so.

On the other hand, this game has been around for hundreds of years, and these style of shafts have been around for about ten years. You will never be able to buy a pool game ( or I would have been the first to sign up). Find what you like and works for you. If you cannot feel the difference, it would not make sense to spend money for it. There are many very good players who use standard maple and laminated shafts.
 
Back
Top