CTE PRO ONE Basic Math
- Thread starter stan shuffett
- Start date
What I presented, concept-wise, was really nothing new. I just used a little bit of a different perspective to say the same thing that has been shown many times. Once again, I was just highlighting the perceptual nature of CTE.
Stan Shuffett
Hows is that amazing?He repeated the same process and came up with different banking lines.Seems to me when this happens something needs fixed.:smile
Normally the only way this happens is, you have changed speeds,maybe spin or you just cut the ball more.
This kinda stuff is the biggest problem with the system.Hows is one to know what
line he's going to get if more then one is created doing the same process?
Anthony
My sentiments were exactly the same when I first looked at this system. It cannot work, right? Then I took it to the table anyways and gave it some serious study. My conclusion was different. It is a visual system, and here is one way to analyze it yourself.
Setup the first shot in the video and get your eyes exactly on the CTE/A visual. Don't worry about sweeps. Now we are at a fixed cueball. Take note of exactly how you are aligned to CB and OB. Now setup shot two in the video, and line up same visuals. At this fixed cueball, take note of your alignment again. We did the same thing so it should be the same, right? Actually it is slightly different :yikes:
This is the result of how our eyes see the visuals in relationship to the position on the table. It is a interplay of our perception and the table position. This is not some trick you have to learn, it is how our perception naturally picks up the lines. If you can see the alignments strongly, it is not hard to go to the table and prove this to yourself.
Last edited:
Nothing changed for me.
I made several attempts at it.
When we do the same thing over an over we should get close to the same results.
If you don't,you did something different.Its not the system, its you.
Anthony
Nothing changed for me.
I made several attempts at it.
When we do the same thing over an over we should get close to the same results.
If you don't,you did something different.Its not the system, its you.
Anthony
You realize that YOU are part of the system, yes? You say that you must do something different. Well, of course you did. But it is your perception that works to make all the "adjustments" for you, not anything you did during execution.
The visuals are executed the same, the sweeps are executed the same, it is the perception that gives you the perfect shot picture to make it work. If that were not true and you had to constantly adjust, you'd be back to ghost ball aiming.
Explain Your perception .
Stan wasnt even trying to pocket a ball.He came up with different lines executing the same process.Lets just add a pocket here,now we can use are perception to the pocket cause now we have direction.He had nothing in his video,he just executed the system without pockets and came out with different results.Not good!
Anthony
BTW you can use the fractional system and come out with a pretty good shot picture.
Close or on the money.:smile: