Filibogado
Registered
I know it is plain heresy to even suggest that CTE/Pro One is a fractional aiming system. I think we all agree that as far as the object ball is concerned, it is not a fractional system because there are only 6 discrete panels, i.e. Left A, Left B, Left C, Right A, Right B and Right C. My problem is when my visuals tell me that the final aiming line falls right on the borderline between any 2 given panels. Given than this borderline visual is only one tick out of 180 ticks, and is as narrow as a hairline crack, do I then adjust my aim from A to B, or from B to C, or from C to B, or from B to A, etc? And how do I know which way to adjust - left or right?
This led me to the hypothesis that while it is forbidden to view the object ball as susceptible of being chopped into fractional units, the eyes may supply the missing fractions. If you can envision your eyes as being akin to ball bearings and your eye sockets being the equivalent of a bearing's race, then it is possible to suggest that the way you find your correct aim is to rotate your eyes in a circular fashion aroound the bearing's race until you find the correct match between eye position and true target. As Stan keeps saying, " the eyes move and the body follows".
The hard part then is trying to plant your body posture to make sure that your eyes are at the zero point of the dial - the so-called sweet spot - before they start rotating fractionally to find the most intuitively comfortable aiming line. But then you end up introducing feel to get to the truest possible aiming line. There's a guy on YouTube who has a series of excellent videos on CTE and in one of his lessons, he advocates using your toe to anchor and/or triangulate your eye position relative to the floor and the table. I think this is an excellent starting point in one's PSR.
Am I making sense?
This led me to the hypothesis that while it is forbidden to view the object ball as susceptible of being chopped into fractional units, the eyes may supply the missing fractions. If you can envision your eyes as being akin to ball bearings and your eye sockets being the equivalent of a bearing's race, then it is possible to suggest that the way you find your correct aim is to rotate your eyes in a circular fashion aroound the bearing's race until you find the correct match between eye position and true target. As Stan keeps saying, " the eyes move and the body follows".
The hard part then is trying to plant your body posture to make sure that your eyes are at the zero point of the dial - the so-called sweet spot - before they start rotating fractionally to find the most intuitively comfortable aiming line. But then you end up introducing feel to get to the truest possible aiming line. There's a guy on YouTube who has a series of excellent videos on CTE and in one of his lessons, he advocates using your toe to anchor and/or triangulate your eye position relative to the floor and the table. I think this is an excellent starting point in one's PSR.
Am I making sense?