What are your perceived pros and cons for lighter versus heavier cues.?
Reason I'm asking:
I got into a discussion this week with two fairly decent players (one a tall guy the other, about 5'7") - they were adamant about using the lightest cue that they could find and said what they're using is 17.5oz (one of them mentioned that they had a lighter one and they prefered it, but had lost it...)
I've always, somewhat, believed that, for a standard length cue, 18-20 oz was the reasonableness boundaries and that lighter would have accuracy issues and heavier, fatigue, and both might cause undesirable stroke compensations.
I'm looking beyond and have already discounted the "it's whatever you get used to" philosophies.
Reason I'm asking:
I got into a discussion this week with two fairly decent players (one a tall guy the other, about 5'7") - they were adamant about using the lightest cue that they could find and said what they're using is 17.5oz (one of them mentioned that they had a lighter one and they prefered it, but had lost it...)
I've always, somewhat, believed that, for a standard length cue, 18-20 oz was the reasonableness boundaries and that lighter would have accuracy issues and heavier, fatigue, and both might cause undesirable stroke compensations.
I'm looking beyond and have already discounted the "it's whatever you get used to" philosophies.