Skip, I don't think it mattered who was selling it - if anything, you received some good references here that should have helped it sell better. Also, I thought the discussions here would push the value up, given that some posters thought the fact that Deno had appraised it was enough - but they didn't bid.SBESAW said:Just find it interesting, as I was the seller of that Rambow, that Joe and others went a long way to discredit it down to the K-Y comments and thought the rest of you might as well. If you visit the now ended auction and read the reply to the last question you with see the complete text, verbatim, of a hand written letter on Pool Table Magic Stationary, signed by Mark, extolling the virtues of the cue and the excellant job by Joel and it's implied value.
I guess it just depends on who is selling it. Double standard comes to mind. What I sell is good, what you sell is crap, sound familiar???? I would be happy to fax a copy of the letter to anyone who cares to read it. Guess this cue that was refinished in 1995 and promoted by Mark the same year after the refinish is now worth a lot less now that they are not selling it. Again happy to fax the letter to substantiate this.
P.S. Glad it's over.

And based on Deno's comments here, I thought there must be some good detail in the provenance to substantiate his findings, and that you would add that to your auction description. You eventually pasted in some of his comments from this forum, but that description needed a re-write to help the cue sell better.

To me, it looked like a really beautiful Brunswick Willie Hoppe re-build by a top-notch cue-maker. The fact that Rambow had built the original cue for Brunswick and that some of the wood from the original cue was still present, was a bonus that should have added to the value.