If I learned anything from my years of teaching psychology classes, it was that human beings behave irrationally in many, many situations. The evidence for this is overwhelming and need not be referenced in this post. Rather, I'd like to mention just two instances of irrational behavior in pool and gambling and invite others to come up with their own examples.
Todd Barker, a good friend of mine and a better pool player than I at all games, once pointed out to me that I appeared to be "giving up" on difficult pool shots rather than giving them my best effort. After hearing him say this, I started watching myself more closely as I addressed extra tough pool shots and found that he was right on the money. It was as though I thought to myself, "Heck, I'm not going to make this shot anyway, so why put much time or effort into it." It seems to me that a rational approach would be to spend MORE time/effort on more difficult shots, right? Wouldn't it make sense from a ratinal perspective to take s little extra care with a more difficult shot by sizing the shot up from a couple of angles, and maybe taking an additional warm up stroke or two? But I'd be willing to bet, if there were any way to gather some good evidence, that many of us pool players actually take LESS time on very difficult shots rather than more time. OK, this is probably not true for the better players out there, but it was true for me and probably some of you who are reading this. When I catch myself doing this (giving up on a hard shot) and force myself to give extra effort, it has definitely paid off.
In gambling, the list of irrational behaviors is too long for one post! Maybe the most famous is the "gambler's fallacy." The gambler's fallacy, in simple terms, is the idea that that previous failures indicate an increased probability of success on subsequent attempts. So, for example, if you witness a coin coming up heads six times in a row, you might think that tails is now more likely on the next flip. Of course, coin tosses are independent events and no string of heads, no matter how long, makes tails any more likely on a subsequent toss.
So what are your favorite "irrational behaviors" in the world of pool and gambling?
Todd Barker, a good friend of mine and a better pool player than I at all games, once pointed out to me that I appeared to be "giving up" on difficult pool shots rather than giving them my best effort. After hearing him say this, I started watching myself more closely as I addressed extra tough pool shots and found that he was right on the money. It was as though I thought to myself, "Heck, I'm not going to make this shot anyway, so why put much time or effort into it." It seems to me that a rational approach would be to spend MORE time/effort on more difficult shots, right? Wouldn't it make sense from a ratinal perspective to take s little extra care with a more difficult shot by sizing the shot up from a couple of angles, and maybe taking an additional warm up stroke or two? But I'd be willing to bet, if there were any way to gather some good evidence, that many of us pool players actually take LESS time on very difficult shots rather than more time. OK, this is probably not true for the better players out there, but it was true for me and probably some of you who are reading this. When I catch myself doing this (giving up on a hard shot) and force myself to give extra effort, it has definitely paid off.
In gambling, the list of irrational behaviors is too long for one post! Maybe the most famous is the "gambler's fallacy." The gambler's fallacy, in simple terms, is the idea that that previous failures indicate an increased probability of success on subsequent attempts. So, for example, if you witness a coin coming up heads six times in a row, you might think that tails is now more likely on the next flip. Of course, coin tosses are independent events and no string of heads, no matter how long, makes tails any more likely on a subsequent toss.
So what are your favorite "irrational behaviors" in the world of pool and gambling?