where did you hear this?From what I understood was that any Open will be 4.25" but an Invitational will be 4". That's for this year anyways. I thought I heard that they will all be 4" next year.
I believe it was a podcast interview. I can't remember which one though.where did you hear this?
where did you hear this?
Players from 675ish and up won't be bothered by tighter pockets. What is a problem is poolrooms that tighten all their tables to these specs. The place i play at has 10 nice GC4's and all are too tight for recreational players. Have a couple for the better players and leave rest at 4.5"(or bigger) for your normal rec. crowd.They are killing the ability of the lower tier of pros to be competitive, there are quite a few players around the 750 Fargo rating that miss on the 4" pockets. 4.25 would be ideal unless the goal is to only have the top 20 players world wide ever finish in the top 8.
I still think the best way to raise the skill bar in pool is to get rid of jump cue use in pro events and keep the pocket size a more normal size where it does not take ungodly skill to make a ball and play position at the same time over several rails. 4.5 may be a tad too large, but 4" is too unforgiving.
Agreed and along with the jump cues, the JUMP SHOT should also be gotten rid of as well.They are killing the ability of the lower tier of pros to be competitive, there are quite a few players around the 750 Fargo rating that miss on the 4" pockets. 4.25 would be ideal unless the goal is to only have the top 20 players world wide ever finish in the top 8.
I still think the best way to raise the skill bar in pool is to get rid of jump cue use in pro events and keep the pocket size a more normal size where it does not take ungodly skill to make a ball and play position at the same time over several rails. 4.5 may be a tad too large, but 4" is too unforgiving.
Not a big fan of the short cue but the jump shot has always been allowed. Both the shot and the cues are here to stay so might as well just deal with it.Agreed and along with the jump cues, the JUMP SHOT should also be gotten rid of as well.
I’m not sure that pockets should be made easier to accommodate lower tier pros and amateurs. These guys are getting crushed by the top players anyways so it doesn’t really change anything.They are killing the ability of the lower tier of pros to be competitive, there are quite a few players around the 750 Fargo rating that miss on the 4" pockets. 4.25 would be ideal unless the goal is to only have the top 20 players world wide ever finish in the top 8.
I still think the best way to raise the skill bar in pool is to get rid of jump cue use in pro events and keep the pocket size a more normal size where it does not take ungodly skill to make a ball and play position at the same time over several rails. 4.5 may be a tad too large, but 4" is too unforgiving.
Players from 675ish and up won't be bothered by tighter pockets. What is a problem is poolrooms that tighten all their tables to these specs. The place i play at has 10 nice GC4's and all are too tight for recreational players. Have a couple for the better players and leave rest at 4.5"(or bigger) for your normal rec. crowd.
I’m not sure that pockets should be made easier to accommodate lower tier pros and amateurs. These guys are getting crushed by the top players anyways so it doesn’t really change anything.
It will change things enough were they can still have a better chance vs having everything stacked against them. Not only do you have to fade guys not missing for 5 racks, now when you are at the table you have to get past shooting into tiny pockets as well. I don't think that should be the case where the setup of the event is built to accommodate the top 20 in the world vs say top 50 or even 100. It would be like the NBA saying "the best players are dunking too easy, let's raise the net another 6 inches", sure that will stop those guys a bit, but it will really really stop the tier of players under the top ones even more from playing as good as they can.
Since the top players will still very likely be on top with tighter pockets or larger pockets, all that smaller pockets do is shrink the size of the player base that can compete. With more normal size pockets for pool we could see some other players get deeper in the field instead of making it so we see the same few players in the top 8 or top 16.
I understand it and am resigned to it unfortunately. However I’m not sure about it always being a part of nineball. Earl pretty much introduced it in 1983 at the Caesar’s Tahoe event when he stunned the crowd with one against the ”Miz”.Prior to that I don’t remember one being used, and I go back roughly 60 years in pool.Not a big fan of the short cue but the jump shot has always been allowed. Both the shot and the cues are here to stay so might as well just deal with it.
Plot thickens.
Agreed and along with the jump cues, the JUMP SHOT should also be gotten rid of as well.
Very true. Put a quarter a few inches in front of a cue ball and jack up very slightly. You'll hop right over it with very little elevation.A lot of standard breaks have the CB in the air most of the way from the cue tip to the head ball. {you can see this in the cloth wear after the tournament is completed.}
Should this also be outlawed ?
Seems to me if CB leaves the bed of the table even a 1/100 of an inch it should be considered a jump shot. {This is basically the same analysis as the double hit.}
If not then you are only discussing how high off the table CB is allowed to go before becoming a foul.