I am curious about how everyone would react to this situation:
It is the B side quarter finals, there is one table in the pool hall with a new cloth, and the rest of the 5 tables had cloth with the same age and condition.
There were two tables (one with new cloth, one with old) avaliable for the players to play on in the quarter finals. Instead of allocating the players to play on the table with the old cloth, the owner of the pool hall wanted to flip a coin to see which table the players had to play their match on. One player asked since there were two tables open, and both players have agreed to play on the table with the old cloth, why did the owner has to do this?
One player told the owner he would rather play on the table with the old cloth, as it is the kind of table he, and most players, have been playing on during the whole tournament. His opponent said he did not have a problem with that. The owner said he had to flip because he did not want anyone to complain, and because he did not want anyone to pick a favorite table.
There were only about 4 or so players left, and there were enough tables even if the table with the new cloth was closed. Anyway, the owner took offense to the questions, and he threatened to forfeit the matches if one player would not agree to the flip.
One player stated that there was never any flip until that point when the two players were going close into the money round, and since there were sufficient tables, the table with the new cloth really had no business to be included at that point in time.
This table was installed by the owner and one of the rails was not installed porperly so it was a bit loose, some of the cloth under the rail looked realy wrinkled. The owner of this pool hall, in my opinion, was taking this matter very personally, and he felt that the players did not respect him by questioning his decision, so he became very defensive. At this point, there was no hope for any meaningful conversation to take place any more.
This is a handicapped tournament, asking a player to switch to a brand new cloth table with a dead rail in the quarterfinals especially when one player has to spot the other is in my opinion, a bit strange, considering that it was really unneccesary to put the table with new cloth into the equation to begin with.
It seems to me the tournament director/pool hall owner wants everyone to listen to him without any question, and he wants everyone to follow his way. He was very offended when one player said he would rather play on the table with old cloth.
I have seen very good tournament director being a lot more flexible than this, because they put the benefits of the players first, and they want everyone to have a good time. Am I expecting too much?
Richard
It is the B side quarter finals, there is one table in the pool hall with a new cloth, and the rest of the 5 tables had cloth with the same age and condition.
There were two tables (one with new cloth, one with old) avaliable for the players to play on in the quarter finals. Instead of allocating the players to play on the table with the old cloth, the owner of the pool hall wanted to flip a coin to see which table the players had to play their match on. One player asked since there were two tables open, and both players have agreed to play on the table with the old cloth, why did the owner has to do this?
One player told the owner he would rather play on the table with the old cloth, as it is the kind of table he, and most players, have been playing on during the whole tournament. His opponent said he did not have a problem with that. The owner said he had to flip because he did not want anyone to complain, and because he did not want anyone to pick a favorite table.
There were only about 4 or so players left, and there were enough tables even if the table with the new cloth was closed. Anyway, the owner took offense to the questions, and he threatened to forfeit the matches if one player would not agree to the flip.
One player stated that there was never any flip until that point when the two players were going close into the money round, and since there were sufficient tables, the table with the new cloth really had no business to be included at that point in time.
This table was installed by the owner and one of the rails was not installed porperly so it was a bit loose, some of the cloth under the rail looked realy wrinkled. The owner of this pool hall, in my opinion, was taking this matter very personally, and he felt that the players did not respect him by questioning his decision, so he became very defensive. At this point, there was no hope for any meaningful conversation to take place any more.
This is a handicapped tournament, asking a player to switch to a brand new cloth table with a dead rail in the quarterfinals especially when one player has to spot the other is in my opinion, a bit strange, considering that it was really unneccesary to put the table with new cloth into the equation to begin with.
It seems to me the tournament director/pool hall owner wants everyone to listen to him without any question, and he wants everyone to follow his way. He was very offended when one player said he would rather play on the table with old cloth.
I have seen very good tournament director being a lot more flexible than this, because they put the benefits of the players first, and they want everyone to have a good time. Am I expecting too much?
Richard