Yes, I'm using the edges.

ThePoliteSniper

Fruitshop Owner
Silver Member
Hallo!

I haven't told this anybody yet. Maybe everybody does it like this and I'm a slow learner, I don't know. So I wasn't sure whether I should share this or not. A short disclaimer though: This is not a system!

Let's say you are faced with a straight shot (no angle). When you are down on the shot, you will see a picture similar to this.
6USbCln.gif

From that perspective the cueball appears to be bigger than the objectball. The goal is obviously to aim the center of the cueball at the center of the red ball. However it's sometimes difficult for me to find the exact center of both balls. I'm not sure why, maybe it has something to do with my dominant eye and the fact that the cueball is very close to my eyes. This, of course, leads to inconsistencies. Sometimes the shot looks right, but my gut feeling says I'm not on the correct line.

A different way to aim is instead of focussing on the the aiming point (the center of the red ball) to focus on the thickness of the shot (full eclipse). The balls are essentially two circles. If you visualize vertical tangents at the left and right edges, you will get something like this.
jei0z0f.gif

For a straight shot the distance between the left white line and the left red line has to be the same as the distance between the two lines on the right side.

For a slight cut to the left the picture may look like this.
nvr5d9E.gif


On every shot I deliberately focus on the edges of the balls and use them to get the correct line of aim. The shots tend to look much clearer that way, especially shots with little angle (maybe 0° - 15°) and thin cuts. This has been part of my routine for more than a year now. It's funny because it's so simple, I almost feel stupid. Sometimes, when I lose concentration, the shots can still start to look wrong, or something just doesn't feel right. Then I focus on the edges again and will usually discover that the edges/tangents aren't where they're supposed to be. And interestingly the error always appears on the left side, meaning when I'm shooting a straight shot and I happen to be on the wrong line, it would look more like the third picture (slight angle to the left). That's why I think it might have something to do with eye dominance.

Well, that's it. That's how I aim. If you want to learn more, you will have to wait for the DVD.
6t4eVDW.gif


Does anybody else do this?
 
Its like you've put your own twist on fractional aiming in order to get the most benefit out of it for yourself. Good job, and well done on making the post easily understandable. A lot of people have trouble putting into words the process that goes on in getting a ball in a hole.

Do you use any form of standard fractional aiming as a quick guide? What I mean is do you instantly recognise a shot to be close to say a 1/4 ball, then overlap the 1/4 ball and fine tune from there?

Its interesting you view the CB as being larger than the OB. I don't think I've ever done that. Do you imagine the overlap and tangents whilst down on a shot or when stood up?

Thanks for posting your method.
 
Hey Sniper,

Glad you posted the above. I have always noticed that the OB seems to be smaller than the QB with distance.
I can't help but to really appreciate snooker players, when the OB is 8'-10' away it must look like the size of a pea.

Here is some more food for thought. Whether standing behind a shot (QB to OB) or down on the shot the QB is only about 18" in front of your face, your dominant eye is very strong, as you look at the OB at some distance your dominant eye is less dominant and the sight line moves closer to the bridge of you nose.

This easy to test, get a 3x5 card and punch a 1/4" hole in the middle. With the card about, lets say 18" away from your face look at the QB with both eyes open thru the hole and slowly bring the card back to your face, you may notice that the hole ends up directly at your dominant eye. Repeat the same procedure looking at the OB at a distance.......where does the hole end up when brought back to your face? It will be closer to the bridge of your nose, not centered on the dominant eye.

On long straight shots, for me, its always best to look and line up the base of the balls.

Have fun :smile:
John
 
Last edited:
I call this whole cue ball aiming. For players who get good with it, in part by ensuring their head is at the right height to see both balls well, they can get a good "look" at the edges of the white ball overlapping the object ball in a sort of ghost ball method.

Having said that, when playing well, the best players tend to not look at the white ball too much when sighting but "see" the object ball target as "on".
 
Back
Top